Posted on 12/28/2007 4:59:07 PM PST by repinwi
SAN FRANCISCO - The deadly tiger escape at the San Francisco Zoo could prove to be a costly blow to an institution that has come under fire repeatedly in just the past few years over the deaths of two elephants and the mauling of a zookeeper.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
Maybe those punks shouldn’t have been teasing the tiger. Ever think of that? If you’re too scared to even go to a zoo, I wonder how you get through life.
The current reports say the youths did NOT provoke the tiger.
The one killed tried to distract the tiger off his friend, and succeeded a bit too well.
That sounded like a neat place-—sorry it’s no longer there.
It had nails??? Call James Sokolove !!!!!
[SAN FRANCISCO - The deadly tiger escape at the San Francisco Zoo could prove to be a costly blow...]
Poor choice of words!!
BooHoo
MANITOWOC (WI)- A scary situation in Manitowoc Thursday morning: two cougars got loose at the Lincoln Park Zoo! Manitowoc police say the suspect or suspects somehow got over this fence and into the Lincoln Park Zoo overnight and cut a hole in the cougar cage.
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22410009/ Cougars Freed At Lincoln Park Zoo
—”For me, it was when the swingsets disappeared from the schools.”—
Must be a public school thing. My daughter’s private school just installed equipment that is theme park worthy.
Evidently, some people are still running Jarts competitions, which probably carry heavier penalties than a Michael Vick dog show. www.jarts.com
You can tell the school playgrounds from the public parks here by looking for a swingset. Both playgrounds have modern, high end playscapes for climbing, sliding, and other fun things, but the ones at the schoolyard don’t have swings.
Did you hear about the full grown tiger that was shot to death near an apartment complex in Dallas on Tuesday?
:Authorities were investigating Thursday the death of a tiger discovered on Christmas Day near the Interstate 35E in Dallas. Someone notified the city ...”
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/122807dnmettiger.59eb712e.html
“DALLAS A veterinarian at the Dallas Zoo performed a necropsy Thursday on a female tiger found shot to death near an apartment complex, a zoo official said ...”
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/5407428.html
They might have done something stupid, but the guy who died didn’t deserve death. A year of community service cleaning up the tiger crap would have been fitting.
May the lawsuit bankrupt the city and get of those who now govern it.
Teeter-totters
Animals in the wild are much more likely to kill people than animals in the zoo.
Remember the gorilla that escaped a while back? Same thing. Thats why I think this zoo’s management deserves a kick in the rear. This has happened with a gorilla recently. These 300 plus pound animals are all muscle, extremely strong.
30 foot moat a problem for a tiger?
Get this:
Did Carl Lewis lose a sure World Record - and perhaps history’s first 30-foot long jump - because of a foul called erroneously by an official? T&FN believes he did.” 28 foot long jumper Jason Grimes estimated Lewis’s fourth jump at “definitely 30 feet”. Lewis said, “I figured it at 30-2.” Boston Globe reporter Joe Concannon wrote, “Had it been measured, it would have been history’s first 30-foot jump.” When Lewis went to look at the plasticine indicator board after his fourth long jump of the evening was called a foul by the official, there were no marks present (as there would have been with a foul). The officials told him that the toe of his shoe had been slightly over the end of the takeoff board.
HHhhmmm...Maybe the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) at work here?
The zoo should be sued.
Tigers had nearly escaped from that enclosure for at least 10 years.
It would appear many must accept some degree of liability in this indcident, not the least of which is no doubt those boys. Think of it this way: this habitat is said to have been built approx 1940 and evidently not once in all that time has there been a tiger get out over that wall. Why do you think that is?
All I'm saying is those who would engage in reckless activity / behavior that places them in harm's way must necessarily be assigned a certain portion of the liability for what happens to them. It's a principal of law that will be applied, if the evidence confirms what I believe transpired.
Out of curiosity, could you comment on why the Dahliwal brothers have been completely unwilling to cooperate with police. These brothers were convicted earlier this year of drunk and disorderly as well as resisting arrest. One or both is scheduled for a Court appearance to answer to charges again on January 15, 2008. Prior bad acts may mean nothing, but I do keep it in mind in assessing the type of persons they are. There's not much in this tragedy that isn't ugly, including the physical situation at the zoo.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.