Yes, I see real possibilities for tutoring but **only** outside of the government school paradigm!
For example:
My niece, a former government school elementary teacher, is at home with a 2 year old now and is tutoring math in her home in Montgomery County, Maryland. She does very well financially. There are some major frustrations for her in doing this tutoring.
One major frustration for her, is that most often her students ( nearly all boys) are really quite bright. The student does understand the material. They do get the correct answers. They have mastered their math facts and do have nearly instant mental recall of these facts. The problem is that the child ( almost always boys) struggle with presenting the material in form that is acceptable to the government school. This form almost always required written presentation ( in words). It is the written portion of government demands in math that nails these kids in class and on the standardized exams.
Her students have little patience for the verbal portion of the math explanation. They rightly reason that have shown all the math steps and the answer is correct, and that should be enough!
What bothers my neice the most is that it is like watching a flower fade before her eyes. She is constant witness to the light and enthusiasm for learning being extingished, permanently, and she knows that only a miracle will re-light it. It is not very satisfying work for her.
There is also the economic issue. I think that a lot of parents would love to home educate, but can’t quite swing having one parent completely quit the workforce to do so. Again, a modified form of tutoring or “microschooling” could help in those kinds of situations.
I would call them "One Room School Houses in the Home".
Yes, I agree with you. There are many parents who lack the confidence, or the skills, or economically both parents must be in the work force. Christian teachers could be wonderful resources for their churches and congregation families. There could also be some combination of church building use and home-setting instruction to help these parents.
A question for your (private) contemplation: how much of evangelization is actually the religious enlightenment aspect, and how much of it is people just wanting a friend to talk to?
Re: message #45: In my experience, yes, the initial interest is often due to loneliness. If the seed takes hold, and starts to sprout, and soon the investigator soon realizes that what he has been feeling is spiritual loneliness due to separation from the Spirit and communication with the Lord.
I thank both of you for this insight. You have definately given me food for thought.
“Yes, I see real possibilities for tutoring but **only** outside of the government school paradigm!”
Of course.
“What bothers my neice the most is that it is like watching a flower fade before her eyes. She is constant witness to the light and enthusiasm for learning being extingished, permanently, and she knows that only a miracle will re-light it. It is not very satisfying work for her.”
That’s a crying shame.
The alternatives that you and I are discussing could help. I think think we’re just arriving at the same place from slightly different roads. I view “microschooling” or “One Room School Houses in the Home” in terms of market reform. I.e. qualified teachers going private in their own enlightened self-interest. Whereas I think you’re coming at it from more of a religious perspective. Both approaches would appear to be complimentary.
Are you aware of any examples where something like this has been put into place? I know of home education co-ops, but those tend to be strictly voluntary; no money or no significant amounts of money change hands. I also know of tutors. But I’ve never seen what is essentially a microschool for hire (be it secular or parochial).
Maybe I don’t get out enough? :-)