Posted on 01/03/2008 9:55:55 AM PST by 3AngelaD
... In this piece, I want to shed light on those instances where violence against women is a must....Occasionally if not daily we hear about events occurring in Islamic and Arab societies. Some human rights organizations recently have attacked violent acts against women, standing against any type of violence even that between a father and daughter and citing the cases of some women as examples.
Consequently, they offer solutions such as complaining to the police, taking revenge or leaving them men, who are either their husbands, fathers or brothers with no exceptions. One such case involved a woman whose husband allegedly had beaten her. Without revealing the husbands reasons for doing so, such human rights organizations immediately urged the wife to complain to the police and the courts, while at the same time generalizing the instance and other similar solutions to any type of violence.If a man and woman are husband and wife, the Quran provides solutions, firstly reaffirming any logical and acceptable reasons for such punishment...
Relationships between fathers and daughters or sisters and brothers also provoke argument from human rights organizations, which propose the suggested solutions for all relationships. Personally, I dont think fathers or brothers would undertake such behavior unless there was a reason for it.
Fathers are responsible for their daughters behavior, but human rights organizations deny this too. Brothers also should take action regarding their sisters behavior, especially if their parents are too old or dead. If a daughter or sister makes a mistake especially a moral one that negatively affects the entire family and its reputation, whats the solution by such organizations? Fathers should handle their daughters via any means that suits their mistake; thus, is it better to use violence to a certain limit or complain to the police? Shall such women then complain to the police against their fathers or brothers? Its really amazing to hear this.
...Will it be a better society once we see wives, mothers, sisters and daughters going from one police station and one court to another, complaining against their husbands, fathers, brothers and even sons?...Dear readers especially women dont think that I hate or am against women; rather, I simply mean to preserve the morals and principles with which Islam has honored us.
I hope my message is clear, since its really quite relevant to the future of our societies, which must be protected from any kind of cultural invasion. majed_thabet@hotmail.com
A ‘barf alert’ for this piece would be woefully inadequate.
Islamic Violence Ping
Thus proving that “feminism” is not about promoting and protecting women,
but simply about destroying the Western traditional Culture.
Contrast this with the chivalry of medieval Europe, where a woman was a person of incredible value to be honored and defended to the death. And then remember that our modern academics tell us that the Crusaders were evil invaders, and the Muslims enlightened victims of Western oppression.
“...To be fair it took well over 1,000 years after Jesus for these types of attitudes to go away in Christian areas.”
Christians always had scripture with the most positive portrayals of women; Ruth, Ester, Mary, and Christ’s loving admonition of the woman sinner. Show me in 400 AD nominally Christian Rome where women were treated as bad as they are in Yemen today.
In my experience, the “few nice places” in such countries were the narrow areas, museums, hotels, restaurants, in which Western standards were being applied and enforced. The rest was pure hell hole.
good grief! What a bunch of barbarians.
>>Christians always had scripture with the most positive portrayals of women; Ruth, Ester, Mary, and Christs loving admonition of the woman sinner. Show me in 400 AD nominally Christian Rome where women were treated as bad as they are in Yemen today.<<
1000 years after that women were still subject to their husbands or older brothers. They didn’t get to vote in most countries for well over a 1000 years. They couldn’t hold most jobs and in many cases all the property went directly to the son leaving the daughters with nothing except being dependent on the brothers.
Some of the things done to “upity” women in Christian nations have been horrific.
In my lifetime, in my state of Georgia, rights were greatly reduced for women, with the husband being legally the head of household.
“...In my lifetime, in my state of Georgia, rights were greatly reduced for women, with the husband being legally the head of household.”
And this compares to the tradition of female circumcision, honor killings, and beatings?
My mother (b. 1916) grew up in rural Arkansas and her only memory of KKK activity concerned Klan threats to White men who mistreated their wives.
Someone asked in another thread a few days ago about moving to a foreign country, I guess for retirement. I’ve been around the world (literally) a few times and after 44 countries, I can say that Dorthy said it the best, “There’s no place like home!”
Home is the United States (and while I’m partial to visiting Jamaica and LOVE Ireland — which is where many of my ancestors are from, and Scotland) and I won’t be moving anywhere, nor ever giving advice to move elsewhere other than the US.
I guess few people notice that more people are trying to GET in, than to get OUT!
I’d say we have a nice place here, and we shouldn’t let some religious fanatics from Islam screw it up.
My statement was that many of these same attitudes persisted in Christian nations for more than a 1,000 years after Christ.
that is clearly correct - Women were essentially property in England, for example, unable to hold a job, earn money, vote, keep money, go to university etc.
By the way, the Klan did a lot more than “stand up for white women.”
We don’t have to deny our past to be critical of Islam today.
Husband beat wife, without finding out why????
Why????
Who gives a crap why, he beat her. Ugh, this is me talking to a rock called Islam.
They told him that this was a very important local custom. That it was humane as the women could not support themselves and a quick death was better than suffering in poverty and hunger for months.
According to the story the governor told the local leaders that his country also had a custom that he was going to follow in such matters. The British custom was that anyone who kills women, is hanged. He told the local leaders that if they want their customs followed, they would certainly not object to his following his customs.
Islam needs a reformation and/or to be held to the standards of a civilized world, where individuals have certain basic rights and freedoms.
If we excuse this behavior as "religion" or allow it in the name of religious freedom, we soon will have Mexican American's performing human sacrifices in the name of the Aztec religion or certain Pacific Islanders performing cannibalism in the name of religious tradition.
There are limits to what civilization will allow and Islam has crossed those lines in many areas. Those good citizens of Mass. gave up burning witches a long time ago. It is time for Islam to give up honor killings and give up on physical abuse of women.
It actually took longer than 1000 years in some areas.
Shorter in the middle east. Especially when most Arabs were Christians BM (Before Mohammed).
“...beating the wife slightly...”!
Reminds me of a joke:
Guy #1: “Hey, have you heard about that new place, “Tempura House?”
Guy #2: “No, what is it?”
Guy #1: “It’s a shelter for lightly-battered women.”
Sorry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.