Skip to comments.
Defending Fred (Vanity, but please help)
Project Vote Smart ^
| (unsure)
| Project Vote Smart
Posted on 01/03/2008 2:03:42 PM PST by scottdeus12
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
To: ImpBill; scottdeus12
To: scottdeus12
...so you think this survey is a fabrication?Yes it is. And I also think you're having some fun trying to stir the pot a little. If you were really a Fred fan you would have known this is complete BS.
42
posted on
01/03/2008 2:55:08 PM PST
by
barker
( A smile is a curved line that sets things straight.)
Comment #43 Removed by Moderator
To: Yaelle
Actually there is evidence that calls Huckabee’s pro-life commitment into question, notably taking money in the past year from a leading embryonic stem cell research company to promote the company.
44
posted on
01/03/2008 3:03:10 PM PST
by
coramdeo
To: reagan_fanatic
Sounds like a scurrilous attempt to undermine the Fredster to me.
As does the posting of this rumor here, with the excited "please help" in the title.
I'm VERY skeptical of the motives of the original poster.
Sorry.
45
posted on
01/03/2008 3:03:28 PM PST
by
samtheman
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: LibLieSlayer
See 43, although don’t know how long admin will keep it up.
46
posted on
01/03/2008 3:06:44 PM PST
by
ImpBill
("America ... Where are you now?" --Greg Adams--Brownsville, TX --On the other Front Line)
To: CharlesWayneCT
Which I believe, but also note that if a supporter of any OTHER candidate tried to make that argument, they would be beat into the ground for it.
Charles,
Very untrue statement!
The difference between Fred being accused of something like this and someone say like Mitt being accused of something like this is that Fred has been CONSISTENTLY CONSERVATIVE, where (with the exception of Hunter and Tancredo) all the other candidates have some very left-leaning skeletons that were recently alive in their past!
To: scottdeus12
It was brought up in the Senate run here in Tennessee and Fred was seen to scratch his head trying to figure out where it came from.
48
posted on
01/03/2008 3:10:03 PM PST
by
Ingtar
(The LDS problem that Romney is facing is not his religion, but his recent Liberal Definitive Stands.)
To: ImpBill
STFU would be sufficient... perhaps someone will post that one, as a mod certainly will zot this one. We have too many families participating for that. I really do appreciate the effort though.
LLS
49
posted on
01/03/2008 3:21:38 PM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims and vote Fred!)
To: scottdeus12
50
posted on
01/03/2008 3:53:14 PM PST
by
BufordP
(Had Mexicans flown planes into the World Trade Center, Jorge Bush would have surrendered.)
To: LibLieSlayer; moder_ator
My bad. Didn't eve think. I could have freepmailed it to you.
Sorry if I offended anyone.
51
posted on
01/03/2008 3:53:39 PM PST
by
ImpBill
("America ... Where are you now?" --Greg Adams--Brownsville, TX --On the other Front Line)
To: ImpBill
No harm done. Thanks again!
LLS
52
posted on
01/03/2008 4:14:23 PM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims and vote Fred!)
To: scottdeus12
Fred says Roe is bad law, and should be overturned. Remember, he is a States' rights man, and I believe if it came right to it, he would say it was each state's right to make its own law accordingly.
This is on his website......
I think Roe vs. Wade was bad law and bad medical science. And the way to address that is through good judges. ("Fox News Sunday," 3/11/07)
Votes Against Public Funding: S. 1357, Roll Call Vote #539, Motion to waive CBA rejected 55-44: R 46-7, D 9-37, October 27, 1995, Thompson voted Yea; S. 1357, Roll Call Vote #542, Motion to instruct conferees agreed to 56-43: R 46-7, D 10-36, October 27, 1995, Thompson voted Yea; HR 1868, CQ Vote #561: Motion agreed to 53-44: R 12-40; D 41-4, November 1, 1995, Thompson voted Nay
53
posted on
01/03/2008 4:44:14 PM PST
by
Jackknife
( "The Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco, and Firearms should be a department store, not a gov't agency.")
To: reagan_fanatic
Yes, sorry I just hit the last post as I was in a hurry
54
posted on
01/03/2008 4:54:44 PM PST
by
marlon
To: Jackknife
Motion to instruct conferees agreed Make sure you look at actual bill votes and not all these little Robert's Rules of Order procedures. A couple of sites have vote records really messed up on some candidates because they look at stuff like this versus actual votes on bills. I don't know the details on the bill you posted (I'll go back now) but that phrase jumped out. That vote just authorizes passing of information from one conference committee to another.
55
posted on
01/03/2008 4:59:54 PM PST
by
mnehring
To: tcrlaf
Hmmm. Reckon PMSNBC and CNN are trying to suppress votes for Fred? Kinda like calling FL for Algore before the polls closed in the Republican heavy panhandle in 2000?
56
posted on
01/03/2008 5:07:58 PM PST
by
SuziQ
To: mnehrling
That vote just authorizes passing of information from one conference committee to another.Correct. I merely cut and pasted from his website, and it included what looks like motions and votes. Thanks. ;-)
57
posted on
01/04/2008 4:47:32 AM PST
by
Jackknife
( "The Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco, and Firearms should be a department store, not a gov't agency.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson