Posted on 01/04/2008 8:35:22 PM PST by Maelstorm
So "Lamarckian evolution" (like the Soviets once tried to support) confirms creationism?
Absolutely.
Lamarck proved that cleaving to the evolving dialectic of evolution through acquired charteristics created more & more research grants from Stalin, thus keepiing Lamarck from acquiring the undesirable characteristic of a bullet hole in his cranium.
http://www.news-medical.net/print_article.asp?id=17855
“Junk” RNA regulates important cellular processes
Medical Research News
Published: Tuesday, 9-May-2006
‘”We may even dare to maintain that proteins are presumably responsible only for the basic structure and function of the cell, while RNA is used for its regulation,” says Mayer. Hence, RNA molecules are a central part of cellular regulation processes and more important than previously thought.’
I don’t think you should put too much stock in this.
The conclusions seems far in excess of the discovery (and it is not a new discovery, but an old one that has been dredged up to fit a conclusion for which there is no application to complex, biological life).
I think there is plenty of stock to put in it. You are right it is not entirely “new”.
How, pray tell, did you draw that bit of absurdity? Or is that your feeble attempt to make an illogical link?
Evolutionists are grasping at any straw to find a path to enable their impossible replacement for God and his creation.
I like this. However, it is not the real story. We’re not ready for the real story.
Once evolution has the stake in it's heart, then creationism wins. Right?
Evolution was born dead, and the stake in its heart is science. Creationism is simply reality, and needs no win.
Its coming, ready or not...
Well, we do have basketball players.
Problematic Chemical Postulates of the RNA World Scenario
Source: Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture
Author: Dean Kenyan
Posted on 03/07/2001 14:17:46 PST by JMJ333
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3aa6b38a607a.htm
‘Junk’ DNA reveals vital role [ultra-conserved sequences]
Nature Magazine | 07 May 2004 | Helen Pearson
Posted on 05/10/2004 7:01:16 AM EDT by PatrickHenry
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1132606/posts
Junk DNA may not be so junky after all
EurekAlert | March 23, 2006 | Johns Hopkins Staff
Posted on 03/29/2006 8:46:20 PM EST by DaveLoneRanger
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1605828/posts
Human genome further unravelled (’Junk’ DNA not so junky after all).
BBC | Thursday, June 14, 2007
Posted on 06/15/2007 1:49:42 PM EDT by Jedi Master Pikachu
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1850881/posts
Jumping ‘Junk’ DNA May Fuel Mammalian Evolution
(’Junk’ DNA not junk at all...ID Vindicated Again)
Scientific American | April 23, 2007 | JR Minkel
Posted on 06/21/2007 8:55:18 PM EDT by GodGunsGuts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1854338/posts
Genetics “Central Dogma” Is Dead
Creation-Evolution Headlines | September 12, 2007
Posted on 09/16/2007 6:45:54 PM EDT by GodGunsGuts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1897522/posts
lol
After I read The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, I learned it's very dangerous to assume theories currently accepted as correct constitute a full revelation and will never change.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.