Skip to comments.New Route For Heredity Bypasses DNA
Posted on 01/04/2008 8:35:22 PM PST by Maelstorm
ScienceDaily (Jan. 4, 2008) A group of scientists in Princeton's Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology has uncovered a new biological mechanism that could provide a clearer window into a cell's inner workings.
What's more, this mechanism could represent an "epigenetic" pathway -- a route that bypasses an organism's normal DNA genetic program -- for so-called Lamarckian evolution, enabling an organism to pass on to its offspring characteristics acquired during its lifetime to improve their chances for survival. Lamarckian evolution is the notion, for example, that the giraffe's long neck evolved by its continually stretching higher and higher in order to munch on the more plentiful top tree leaves and gain a better shot at surviving.
The research also could have implications as a new method for controlling cellular processes, such as the splicing order of DNA segments, and increasing the understanding of natural cellular regulatory processes, such as which segments of DNA are retained versus lost during development. The team's findings will be published Jan. 10 in the journal Nature.
Princeton biologists Laura Landweber, Mariusz Nowacki and Vikram Vijayan, together with other members of the lab, wanted to decipher how the cell accomplished this feat, which required reorganizing its genome without resorting to its original genetic program. They chose the singled-celled ciliate Oxytricha trifallax as their testbed.
Ciliates are pond-dwelling protozoa that are ideal model systems for studying epigenetic phenomena. While typical human cells each have one nucleus, serving as the control center for the cell, these ciliate cells have two. One, the somatic nucleus, contains the DNA needed to carry out all the non-reproductive functions of the cell, such as metabolism. The second, the germline nucleus, like humans' sperm and egg, is home to the DNA needed for sexual reproduction.
When two of these ciliate cells mate, the somatic nucleus gets destroyed, and must somehow be reconstituted in their offspring in order for them to survive. The germline nucleus contains abundant DNA, yet 95 percent of it is thrown away during regeneration of a new somatic nucleus, in a process that compresses a pretty big genome (one-third the size of the human genome) into a tiny fraction of the space. This leaves only 5 percent of the organism's DNA free for encoding functions. Yet this small hodgepodge of remaining DNA always gets correctly chosen and then descrambled by the cell to form a new, working genome in a process (described as "genome acrobatics") that is still not well understood, but extremely deliberate and precise.
Landweber and her colleagues have postulated that this programmed rearrangement of DNA fragments is guided by an existing "cache" of information in the form of a DNA or RNA template derived from the parent's nucleus. In the computer realm, a cache is a temporary storage site for frequently used information to enable quick and easy access, rather than having to re-fetch or re-create the original information from scratch every time it's needed.
"The notion of an RNA cache has been around for a while, as the idea of solving a jigsaw puzzle by peeking at the cover of the box is always tempting," said Landweber, associate professor of ecology and evolutionary biology. "These cells have a genomic puzzle to solve that involves gathering little pieces of DNA and putting them back together in a specified order. The original idea of an RNA cache emerged in a study of plants, rather than protozoan cells, though, but the situation in plants turned out to be incorrect."
Through a series of experiments, the group tested out their hypothesis that DNA or RNA molecules were providing the missing instruction booklet needed during development, and also tried to determine if the putative template was made of RNA or DNA. DNA is the genetic material of most organisms, however RNA is now known to play a diversity of important roles as well. RNA is DNA's chemical cousin, and has a primary role in interpreting the genetic code during the construction of proteins.
First, the researchers attempted to determine if the RNA cache idea was valid by directing specific RNA-destroying chemicals, known as RNAi, to the cell before fertilization. This gave encouraging results, disrupting the process of development, and even halting DNA rearrangement in some cases.
In a second experiment, Nowacki and Yi Zhou, both postdoctoral fellows, discovered that RNA templates did indeed exist early on in the cellular developmental process, and were just long-lived enough to lay out a pattern for reconstructing their main nucleus. This was soon followed by a third experiment that " required real chutzpah," Landweber said, "because it meant reprogramming the cell to shuffle its own genetic material."
Nowacki, Zhou and Vijayan, a 2007 Princeton graduate in electrical engineering, constructed both artificial RNA and DNA templates that encoded a novel, pre-determined pattern; that is, that would take a DNA molecule of the ciliate's consisting of, for example, pieces 1-2-3-4-5 and transpose two of the segments, to produce the fragment 1-2-3-5-4. Injecting their synthetic templates into the developing cell produced the anticipated results, showing that a specified RNA template could provide a new set of rules for unscrambling the nuclear fragments in such a way as to reconstitute a working nucleus.
"This wonderful discovery showed for the first time that RNA can provide sequence information that guides accurate recombination of DNA, leading to reconstruction of genes and a genome that are necessary for the organism," said Meng-Chao Yao, director of the Institute of Molecular Biology at Taiwan's Academia Sinica. "It reveals that genetic information can be passed on to following generations via RNA, in addition to DNA."
The research team believes that if this mechanism extends to mammalian cells, then it could suggest novel ways for manipulating genes, besides those already known through the standard methods of genetic engineering. This could lead to possible applications for creating new gene combinations or restoring aberrant cells to their original, healthy state.
Support for the team's research was provided by the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health and the School of Engineering and Applied Science senior thesis research fund.
It is epigenetics that separates mice, men, and apes. We can tell by simple analysis that human beings, mice, and apes are not 99% the same. It is a myth. Also it turns out there are significant errors in the published DNA sequences as well as errors in the programs used compare sequences resulting in an error which was assuming that similar sequences were more likely to be correct and ignoring those which were not. Also the published comparisons were based only on a comparison of a small subset of the genomes. We now know that even small differences 1.44% results in changes to as much as 80% of amino acid sequences. Also there is the interesting discovery of Denova genes which appear to not come from any known existing genes.
The genie isn't staying in the box and its a genie bigger than anyone anticipated.
Hurray!!! This is good news. Forget the triple heart bypass surgery and get the new improved genetic bypass surgery.
Manipulating offspring phenotypes according to a “scouting report” of life-supporting conditions is a mechanism known to exist in early life on Earth. It should be surprising if that kind of adaption had been obsoleted by pure DNA combination.
Wow! By that explanation of Giraffes, I am surprised there aren’t more “porn stars.”
You are, of course, referring to "deep throat." ;)
Careful now,... this is a family friendly website.
So a cell could reorganize itself? Whatever happened to random mutation and natural selection?
This is almost enough to make you wonder if it wasn't programmed to do this. Or if a cell could meddle with things, why not something far more intelligent and powerful?
Phony science. Tin foil hats on—the Communists and Socialists tried to spread this c**p years ago for political reasons.
Thanks, Happy New Year!
I don’t know, all I know as I have for some time that those cells are more advanced than anything we have created yet or will create in the near future. They have complex messaging and error correction systems and layer upon layer of epigenetic control logic. We have only scratched the surface what is there buried in DNA and RNA.
The evolutionary theories of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829) preceeded Darwin's natural selection by more than 50 years. Surely you aren't one of those who thought Darwin was the first to conceive of the idea of evolution, are you?
Good thing these guys escaped the Darwin death squad, the one dedicated to preventing real research from getting published.
uncovered a new biological mechanism that could provide a clearer window into a cell's inner workings. What's more, this mechanism could represent an "epigenetic" pathway -- a route that bypasses an organism's normal DNA genetic program -- for so-called Lamarckian evolution, enabling an organism to pass on to its offspring characteristics acquired during its lifetime to improve their chances for survival.Heh heh heh... thanks Ernest... someone's gonna stroke out when they read this one... heh heh heh...
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo ·
· History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·
They still haven't simplified it enough for too many here to understand it.
They left off the subtitle:
Perhaps you could do the honors?
It appears that reality may have slammed the evos upside their little heads.
The fact that DNA effectively prevents the kind of nonsense that evolution would require seems to have suddenly sunk in. Now they are searching for ways to circumvent DNA's built-in protection? Lotsa luck chumps!
So "Lamarckian evolution" (like the Soviets once tried to support) confirms creationism?
Lamarck proved that cleaving to the evolving dialectic of evolution through acquired charteristics created more & more research grants from Stalin, thus keepiing Lamarck from acquiring the undesirable characteristic of a bullet hole in his cranium.
“Junk” RNA regulates important cellular processes
Medical Research News
Published: Tuesday, 9-May-2006
‘”We may even dare to maintain that proteins are presumably responsible only for the basic structure and function of the cell, while RNA is used for its regulation,” says Mayer. Hence, RNA molecules are a central part of cellular regulation processes and more important than previously thought.’
I don’t think you should put too much stock in this.
The conclusions seems far in excess of the discovery (and it is not a new discovery, but an old one that has been dredged up to fit a conclusion for which there is no application to complex, biological life).
I think there is plenty of stock to put in it. You are right it is not entirely “new”.
How, pray tell, did you draw that bit of absurdity? Or is that your feeble attempt to make an illogical link?
Evolutionists are grasping at any straw to find a path to enable their impossible replacement for God and his creation.
I like this. However, it is not the real story. We’re not ready for the real story.
Once evolution has the stake in it's heart, then creationism wins. Right?
Evolution was born dead, and the stake in its heart is science. Creationism is simply reality, and needs no win.
Its coming, ready or not...
Well, we do have basketball players.
Problematic Chemical Postulates of the RNA World Scenario
Source: Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture
Author: Dean Kenyan
Posted on 03/07/2001 14:17:46 PST by JMJ333
‘Junk’ DNA reveals vital role [ultra-conserved sequences]
Nature Magazine | 07 May 2004 | Helen Pearson
Posted on 05/10/2004 7:01:16 AM EDT by PatrickHenry
Junk DNA may not be so junky after all
EurekAlert | March 23, 2006 | Johns Hopkins Staff
Posted on 03/29/2006 8:46:20 PM EST by DaveLoneRanger
Human genome further unravelled (’Junk’ DNA not so junky after all).
BBC | Thursday, June 14, 2007
Posted on 06/15/2007 1:49:42 PM EDT by Jedi Master Pikachu
Jumping ‘Junk’ DNA May Fuel Mammalian Evolution
(’Junk’ DNA not junk at all...ID Vindicated Again)
Scientific American | April 23, 2007 | JR Minkel
Posted on 06/21/2007 8:55:18 PM EDT by GodGunsGuts
Genetics “Central Dogma” Is Dead
Creation-Evolution Headlines | September 12, 2007
Posted on 09/16/2007 6:45:54 PM EDT by GodGunsGuts
After I read The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, I learned it's very dangerous to assume theories currently accepted as correct constitute a full revelation and will never change.