Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Route For Heredity Bypasses DNA
ScienceDaily ^ | (Jan. 4, 2008) | ScienceDaily(Princeton University)

Posted on 01/04/2008 8:35:22 PM PST by Maelstorm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: editor-surveyor
It appears that reality may have slammed the evos upside their little heads.

So "Lamarckian evolution" (like the Soviets once tried to support) confirms creationism?

21 posted on 01/05/2008 12:04:18 PM PST by Captain Pike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Captain Pike
So "Lamarckian evolution" (like the Soviets once tried to support) confirms creationism?

Absolutely.

Lamarck proved that cleaving to the evolving dialectic of evolution through acquired charteristics created more & more research grants from Stalin, thus keepiing Lamarck from acquiring the undesirable characteristic of a bullet hole in his cranium.

22 posted on 01/05/2008 12:57:43 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (If God didn't want a Liberal/RINO hanging from every tree, He wouldn't have created so much rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

http://www.news-medical.net/print_article.asp?id=17855

“Junk” RNA regulates important cellular processes
Medical Research News
Published: Tuesday, 9-May-2006

‘”We may even dare to maintain that proteins are presumably responsible only for the basic structure and function of the cell, while RNA is used for its regulation,” says Mayer. Hence, RNA molecules are a central part of cellular regulation processes and more important than previously thought.’


23 posted on 01/05/2008 2:53:16 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

I don’t think you should put too much stock in this.

The conclusions seems far in excess of the discovery (and it is not a new discovery, but an old one that has been dredged up to fit a conclusion for which there is no application to complex, biological life).


24 posted on 01/05/2008 3:01:35 PM PST by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000

I think there is plenty of stock to put in it. You are right it is not entirely “new”.


25 posted on 01/05/2008 3:26:10 PM PST by Maelstorm (A candidate that does not believe America is the best country on earth need not apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Captain Pike; ApplegateRanch
"So "Lamarckian evolution" (like the Soviets once tried to support) confirms creationism?"

How, pray tell, did you draw that bit of absurdity? Or is that your feeble attempt to make an illogical link?

Evolutionists are grasping at any straw to find a path to enable their impossible replacement for God and his creation.

26 posted on 01/06/2008 11:21:44 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

I like this. However, it is not the real story. We’re not ready for the real story.


27 posted on 01/06/2008 11:23:28 AM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
How, pray tell, did you draw that bit of absurdity? Or is that your feeble attempt to make an illogical link?

Once evolution has the stake in it's heart, then creationism wins. Right?

28 posted on 01/06/2008 11:45:07 AM PST by Captain Pike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Captain Pike

Evolution was born dead, and the stake in its heart is science. Creationism is simply reality, and needs no win.


29 posted on 01/06/2008 12:30:23 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"We’re not ready for the real story."

Its coming, ready or not...

30 posted on 01/06/2008 12:31:48 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: elephantlips

Well, we do have basketball players.


31 posted on 01/06/2008 1:20:55 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Problematic Chemical Postulates of the RNA World Scenario
Source: Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture
Author: Dean Kenyan
Posted on 03/07/2001 14:17:46 PST by JMJ333
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3aa6b38a607a.htm

‘Junk’ DNA reveals vital role [ultra-conserved sequences]
Nature Magazine | 07 May 2004 | Helen Pearson
Posted on 05/10/2004 7:01:16 AM EDT by PatrickHenry
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1132606/posts

Junk DNA may not be so junky after all
EurekAlert | March 23, 2006 | Johns Hopkins Staff
Posted on 03/29/2006 8:46:20 PM EST by DaveLoneRanger
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1605828/posts

Human genome further unravelled (’Junk’ DNA not so junky after all).
BBC | Thursday, June 14, 2007
Posted on 06/15/2007 1:49:42 PM EDT by Jedi Master Pikachu
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1850881/posts

Jumping ‘Junk’ DNA May Fuel Mammalian Evolution
(’Junk’ DNA not junk at all...ID Vindicated Again)
Scientific American | April 23, 2007 | JR Minkel
Posted on 06/21/2007 8:55:18 PM EDT by GodGunsGuts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1854338/posts

Genetics “Central Dogma” Is Dead
Creation-Evolution Headlines | September 12, 2007
Posted on 09/16/2007 6:45:54 PM EDT by GodGunsGuts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1897522/posts


32 posted on 01/06/2008 8:42:27 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________Profile updated Sunday, December 30, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

lol


33 posted on 01/06/2008 8:51:16 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
My high school biology textbook mocked Lamarck; the line basically was how could those people have been so dumb as to believe in that.

After I read The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, I learned it's very dangerous to assume theories currently accepted as correct constitute a full revelation and will never change.

34 posted on 01/07/2008 9:00:47 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson