Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Says U.S. Should Have Bombed WWII Death Camp
FoxNews ^ | Friday, January 11, 2008 | AP

Posted on 01/11/2008 5:54:03 AM PST by SolidWood

JERUSALEM — President Bush had tears in his eyes during an hour-long tour of Israel's Holocaust memorial Friday and told Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that the U.S. should have bombed Auschwitz to halt the killing, the memorial's chairman said.

Bush emerged from a tour of the Yad Vashem memorial calling it a "sobering reminder" that evil must be resisted, and praising victims for not losing their faith.

...(snip)

Bush was visibly moved as he toured the site, said Yad Vashem's chairman, Avner Shalev.

"Twice, I saw tears well up in his eyes," Shalev said.

At one point, Bush viewed aerial photos of the Auschwitz camp taken during the war by U.S. forces and called Rice over to discuss why the American government had decided against bombing the site, Shalev said.

The Allies had detailed reports about Auschwitz during the war from Polish partisans and escaped prisoners. But they chose not to bomb the camp, the rail lines leading to it, or any of the other Nazi death camps, preferring instead to focus all resources on the broader military effort, a decision that became the subject of intense controversy years later.

...(snip)

"We should have bombed it," Bush said, according to Shalev.

In the memorial's visitors' book, the president wrote simply, "God bless Israel, George Bush."

...

"I was most impressed that people in the face of horror and evil would not forsake their God. In the face of unspeakable crimes against humanity, brave souls — young and old — stood strong for what they believe," Bush said.

"I wish as many people as possible would come to this place. It is a sobering reminder that evil exists, and a call that when evil exists we must resist it," he said.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: auschwitz; bush; bushvisit; germany; holocaust; israel; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: goodwithagun

” Many Jews actually begged him to bomb the death camps”

Very few outside the Bergsonites did. Most Jews in America were too happy being liberal to care.


61 posted on 01/11/2008 9:37:25 AM PST by moopie1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

At the very least, we should have annihilated Solahütte.


62 posted on 01/11/2008 10:18:32 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard ("and alllll the children are insane")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Another thing that factored in—during World War I, the Allies wildly exaggerated atrocities committed by the Central Powers. There *were* documented atrocities (whole villages razed and hundreds of civilians killed) but not to the level that the Allied governments and news media of the day reported. When this came out after the war, people became very skeptical of reports like that.

In the end, though, you’re probably right—the Allies simply decided to concentrate on what they saw as military targets, and the concentration camps would’ve only been considered as such in regard to how they helped the German war effort with slave labor production facilities. Besides, were the USAAF and RAF bombing Poland, even in 1945? They could’ve hit camps in Germany like Buchenwald easily, but Auschwitz and the Polish death camps were in the Soviet area of operations.

}:-)4


63 posted on 01/11/2008 10:34:25 AM PST by Moose4 (Wasting away again in Michaelnifongville.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

He cried? Then I suppose his approval numbers will rise.


64 posted on 01/11/2008 10:36:53 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Many military decisions had to be made during the war. One was to deny Patton the fuel for his armor so he could overrun the Germans all the way to Berlin because there was a shortage at that time and Montgomery needed fuel too even though he wasn’t moving much. Still second-guessing that one.

Funny thing about Rommel in Africa. He couldn’t get fuel for his armor even though some of the most major oil strikes were made in the same place a few years later.

During the Battle of the Bulge the attack stalled for lack of fuel even though the Germans were only yards from a huge fuel depot in France and didn’t know it.


65 posted on 01/11/2008 10:42:21 AM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Wow. Such a lot of fuss about a casual remark. Do we really think he was dissing our government or our military 60 years ago? He was just showing anger at the horrors he was seeing. Did it really have to be calculating and rational about it?


66 posted on 01/11/2008 10:50:18 AM PST by sazerac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: awake-n-angry
That was an air search radar, a lot easier. It also wasn't possible till they operated at higher frequencies to get a tube that would fit on an aircraft and a short enough pulse that could image the ground. Thanks the Brits for the magnatron.

I believe the ground mapping radar was call H2S. Also from the Brits I beleive.

68 posted on 01/11/2008 11:13:58 AM PST by Doctor Raoul (Abolish the CIA, give the job to the Free Clinic who know how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Maybe, but I’m TIRED of grown men crying! If you cry because a close family member dies...well, I’ll make an exception - IF you try to keep it private. Otherwise, turn off the spigot!

Crying is an emotional outlet and good for the soul. Some people get to the point they can't cry, just because they held it back for so long. I'm one of those. I would love to just have a good cry once in awhile. Tears are cleansing but that's just my opinion.

69 posted on 01/11/2008 11:23:37 AM PST by Texas Mom (Two places you're always welcome. Church and Grandma's house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mfnorman

Oh, the allies knew what was going on.

But at the time, the allied commanders had to make choices.

Woulda, coulda, shoulda, if’s, and but’s. Easier to criticize after the fact, rather than being the one making that decision at the time.


70 posted on 01/11/2008 11:24:03 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Hillary = Senator Incitatus, Clintigula's whore...er, horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mfnorman
i don’t think the allied powers were even aware of their exixtence until they marched up to the gates to liberate them

The allies were aware of what was going on.

71 posted on 01/11/2008 11:55:24 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mfnorman
i don’t think the allied powers were even aware of their exixtence until they marched up to the gates to liberate them.

Wrong. That photograph that Bush saw and commented on has been at the beginning of the Yad Vashem tour since at least 1990, when I went there. It is a photo from a US recon plane. Please READ the article:

At one point, Bush viewed aerial photos of the Auschwitz camp taken during the war by U.S. forces and called Rice over to discuss why the American government had decided against bombing the site, Shalev said.

The Allies had detailed reports about Auschwitz during the war from Polish partisans and escaped prisoners. But they chose not to bomb the camp, the rail lines leading to it, or any of the other Nazi death camps, preferring instead to focus all resources on the broader military effort, a decision that became the subject of intense controversy years later. [Emphasis added by me].

I took a class at Georgetown from one of those Polish partisans, Jan Karski. He reported directly to some of the very top people in the US and Britain (including Roosevelt twice, Cordell Hull, William Donovan and Anthony Eden), and he very specifically stated that he not only told them, but that he provided many photos of the atrocities. Anyone interested in this authentic hero could spend their time well by reading his bio at Wikipedia.

We knew, but did nothing. Just like with the imprisonment of the Japanese-Americans, this will be a blot on our performance during WW2. While nothing can take away from the sacrifices of the individuals in our armed forces to destroy the Nazi, Italian and Japanese regimes, our leaders were guilty as Hell of doing just about nothing in the face of some of the worst atrocities in the history of Mankind. Facts are facts, pleasant or not.

72 posted on 01/11/2008 12:26:58 PM PST by Ancesthntr (I’ve joined the Frederation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood
He should listen to his own words. However this is contradicted by the US support for the "palestinian" islamofascists. Yesterday President Bush sounded like (pardon me...) Carter, when urging Israel to stop the "occupation" and give the Palis a "right to return." What is going on in this man's head? I can't figure it out. I fear it's the StateDepartment pressuring Bush to pander to the Arabs.

Damned right - Bush is pandering to people, giving aid to them, who would GLEEFULLY recreate the concentration camps and finish Hitler's dirtiest deed if given the chance. Sometimes Bush makes me wonder how good of a man he really is - or how intelligent (and I voted for the guy twice, and still would against the 2 babbling, Socialist morons the Dems put up against him).

73 posted on 01/11/2008 12:29:39 PM PST by Ancesthntr (I’ve joined the Frederation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mfnorman

In reply to post #4...I do think they knew because of Ultra, and other sources in the late 30’s.


74 posted on 01/11/2008 1:11:21 PM PST by msnpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

Comment to post #21: Something to consider, I don’t think FDR would have had much of a choice. I’ve been reading and collecting WWII books for about 40 years.

Just finished a book called ‘Big Week’ by Glenn Infield.

The demand of fighting aircraft by two theatres set the Allies back on bombing goals, knocking out the Luftwaffe the primary goal to be able to invade Normandy. B17’s were especially behind on delivery in 1943, and they couldn’t strike with multi hundreds of bombers until late in the war. The German fighter production was never completely stopped, so they decided to go after the oil. The tactical aircraft were desperately needed to stop the German reinforcements and supplies reaching the front.

So, I don’t think serious operations could have been performed until the last few months of the war.


75 posted on 01/11/2008 1:28:00 PM PST by msnpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The denial of fuel to Patton may have been for several reasons.

Politics and in-fighting between The British and Americans, which Ike was good at handling.

And political considerations with the Russians and what who would take.

On Rommel, he had plenty of fuel sent to him from Italy. Ultra was reading the tanker schedules, departures to Africa. So when they wanted to sink them they sent conventional recon planes out to make it look like they were spotted by them, so not to cause suspicion of Ultra.

On the battle of the bulge, the bombing campaign against fuel really helped to stall it along with Pattons efforts.

***Many military decisions had to be made during the war. One was to deny Patton the fuel for his armor so he could overrun the Germans all the way to Berlin because there was a shortage at that time and Montgomery needed fuel too even though he wasn’t moving much. Still second-guessing that one.

Funny thing about Rommel in Africa. He couldn’t get fuel for his armor even though some of the most major oil strikes were made in the same place a few years later.

During the Battle of the Bulge the attack stalled for lack of fuel even though the Germans were only yards from a huge fuel depot in France and didn’t know it.***

76 posted on 01/11/2008 1:44:54 PM PST by msnpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
Just read about that, your right. We borrowed it from the British and developed it to set up B17’s to bomb through the clouds in 1944, and was successful.

***I believe the ground mapping radar was call H2S. Also from the Brits I believe.***

77 posted on 01/11/2008 1:51:23 PM PST by msnpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

If Bush is so moved by the Holocaust, why is he fighting so hard to help Arab terrorist finish the job by demanding a new terror state?


78 posted on 01/11/2008 1:56:08 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

btt


79 posted on 01/11/2008 2:58:59 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood
What is going on in this man's head? I can't figure it out

Let's put it this way. After watching Hillary cry on tv he would have voted for her in NH.

80 posted on 01/11/2008 5:05:19 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson