Posted on 01/14/2008 9:58:18 AM PST by milwguy
Terrell Owens breaks down, and it harkens to the not-so-distant-past for Charlie.
The girl who did the Britney video was a guy. :) Well, sorta of. As for TO, he’s a chump.
I watched him miss a key reception and assume he is “defending” Romo to keep Tony as the goat.
I’d cry too they way they played, ha ha.
I bet no other playoff QB took time away from studying films and what not to go to Mexico. Romo will be a franchise QB but never a SB QB he can’t take the pressure and is immature. I thought he was going to cry in the 4th quarter and the look on Jerry Jones face when the ball went over on downs at the end when he was on the sidelines was priceless.
Ha, TO is now TKO!!
His team got beat by the lesser Manning.
Patriots v Green Bay again.
Go Pats.
Pats vs. Giants, but I’d rather have the Pack ( less defense ).
Go Pats!
Oh, yes! I wanted to see a bunch of replays of that from different angles. haha
Three quick observations:
1. TO was, as usual, just being TO. He clearly thought to himself, “Now let’s see, we’re a bunch of losers — and I did next to nothing to help us win — so how can I still steal the spotlight? Oh, yeah, I know: tears!”
2. TO knows doggone well that Tony Romo’s off-field delights took the QB’s mind and body off the game. So, he (TO) finds a devious way to bring it to the fore.
3. TO is one of the most blatant and transparent liers in the history of the sport to claim that he has always had his quarterback’s backs. Yeah, TO, just long enough to plunge the knife in them.
TO is a great receiver — and a lousy excuse for a human being.
The one I like was Crayton sucking it up. He talks smack all week about handling the Giants so they can get back to Arizona and rematch the Pats and beat them because they aren’t that good ( totally discounting the winner of Pack/Seahawks game ).
TO talking smack doesn’t bother me because he sometimes back it up, Crayton is a loser and at best an average receiver and maybe shopping for a new home next year the way Jerry’s forehead was stretching.
“I watched him miss a key reception and assume he is “defending” Romo to keep Tony as the goat.”
Precisely, what he was really doing by insisting that the media better not attack ‘his’ QB yada, yada, was reminding the media that they should be going after the QB.
And when will the NFL finally charge receivers with their drops instead of adding them to the QB’s incompletion total? That would also have the added benefit of gradually weeding the hot dogs and prima donnas out of the receiving corps.
That’s a fantastic editing job - LOVE IT! HA!
The tears notwithstanding, I thought TO showed some maturity (finally) in his comments. He had the chance to do what he’s been so good at in the past, rant and rave about his coaches and teammates. He didn’t. He said they lost as a team, no finger pointing. I respect that.
Aha... like the difference between a wild pitch (fault of pitcher) and a passed ball (fault of catcher)? That does make sense.
Yeah, but with her Dad along for the ride?! Creepy...
When will they stop paying unproven, basically rookie QB’s big salaries based on 12 total games ( or less ) just to watch them fold like an old lawn chair, haw haw.
Seriously they should come up with a base salary for all and based on your stats and the team’s record you get incentives.
Dallas media is saying Jerry took the loss very hard - we'll see how hard.
Unless you are being paid $60 million to win a game when it counts that you are not preparing for.
I believe he ( or anyone ) owe it to their team to ratchet up in the playoffs there is time for vacations after Feb 3.
How do you determine what was catchable? One side effect of that was that both of Brady's incompletes hit the receiver's hands. He would be perfect under your system, although the last one wasn't catchable (even by Moss.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.