Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

40-cent-per-gallon gasoline tax increase urged by federal panel
The Houston Chronicle ^ | Jan. 15, 2008 | RAD SALLEE

Posted on 01/15/2008 2:56:00 PM PST by BradtotheBone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: purpleraine
:-} That it is.

BTW, Americans currently use about 320 billion gallons of petro per year. That comes out to a 128 billion dollar tax increase per year on Americas producers or a 1 trillion 128 billion taxe increase on the low side for the decade after the tax is enacted.

Nice stimulus package!

81 posted on 01/15/2008 3:58:54 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

We are in a political twilight zone, with no sign post up ahead.


82 posted on 01/15/2008 4:01:08 PM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

If this goes through, There will be a lot of DC strretlights with VERRRRRRRY interesting things hangin from them.


83 posted on 01/15/2008 4:03:05 PM PST by Cheapskate (Still backing Hunter"I refuse to be fitted with collar and chain, and given a pat on the back")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: weegee

In Cal, we’re busy trying to make carpool lanes, toll lanes. We pay a high gas tax and then the state puts the money into the general fund. So when we need transportation money, we just convert lanes to tolls. No problem.


84 posted on 01/15/2008 4:05:55 PM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Cheapskate

It gets talked about, but it does not happen.


85 posted on 01/15/2008 4:08:57 PM PST by TexasRepublic (Islam is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

I urge a personal $40,000,0000 “tax” on every member of this Federal Panel.


86 posted on 01/15/2008 4:10:36 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Mass transit doesn’t work. Stop throwing money at it.


87 posted on 01/15/2008 4:11:17 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
The Minneapolis bridge collapse, which killed 13 people and injured about 100, also shone a national spotlight on the unsteady condition of the nation's roads and bridges and drew new calls for additional spending.

A report today exposed the bridge failure as a defect in the DESIGN of the bridge, not because of inadequate maintenance or insufficient funds for maintenance.

The socialists are running full tilt to make driving a private vehicle unaffordable while raping our wallets to pay for more useless rail projects. The mandated increase in CAFE fuel standards will be accomplished by making vehicles smaller and lighter. That will lead to INCREASED fatalities based on previous experience. That is completely opposite to the objective of lower fatalities sought in the article's recommendations. The left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing.

88 posted on 01/15/2008 4:14:46 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: purpleraine
In Energy Victory, the author points out that we could have flex fuel (methanol, ethanol, and gasoline) cars rolling off the line in 1 year at $100 more per car. The drivers and the market would then decide which type of oil to provide.

GM reports the new CAFE standards will raise the cost of vehicles a minimum of $6,000. Flex fuels like ethanol REDUCE mileage. Again, the left hand isn't paying attention to the right hand.

89 posted on 01/15/2008 4:17:30 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
The idea in Energy Victory is to have a choice, methanol, ethanol, or gasoline. Many sources, agriculture, biomass etc.

Anyone who is setting a mileage goal ten years out, is merely managing the status quo. If they were serious about alternatives, mileage standards would be a moot issue.

90 posted on 01/15/2008 4:20:05 PM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
Just make it a dollar are two!

Now where did I park my mule!

91 posted on 01/15/2008 4:21:55 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Ummm, shouldn’t mass transit be provided BEFORE the huge tax increase to force people to want to use the non-existent mass transit?


92 posted on 01/15/2008 4:22:05 PM PST by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

I didn’t vote for that bastard,and when gas goes up you are gonna hear me bitch.Load and clear.Then I will start to inflict political damage on those responsible.


93 posted on 01/15/2008 4:39:10 PM PST by Farmer Dean (168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

BTTT


94 posted on 01/15/2008 4:39:23 PM PST by Pagey (Horrible Hillary Clinton is Bad For America, Bad For Business and Bad For MY Stomach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean
My point wasn't validating what he said, it was to illustrate how completely frickin irresponsible the comment was. It was also to point out how the public has quite the selective memory.

If Fred Thompson said during a national debate that electricity rates in our country are artificially low and that we should be paying $14 per Killowatt hour and half the country voted for him, don't you think utility companies would incorporate his point into their future pricing structure plans?

95 posted on 01/15/2008 5:28:46 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Any “poor sucker” who buys gasoline, diesel, or any other motor fuel already automatically pays a fuel tax that at least theoretically goes toward the construction and maintenance of highways and other roads. Motor vehicles generally do use those roads as rarely as they buy gasoline and thereby pay fuel taxes. (Most legislatures frequently pilfer the road maintenance fund for non-road spending and then complain of a lack of money to construct and maintain roads.) Perhaps “every poor sucker” nowadays only buys gasoline for non-road motors like lawn mowers, but in my experience, an overwhelming majority of gasoline purchases historically went toward on-road motor vehicle fuels.


96 posted on 01/15/2008 5:59:14 PM PST by dufekin (Name the leader of our enemy: Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, terrorist dictator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: purpleraine
The idea in Energy Victory is to have a choice, methanol, ethanol, or gasoline. Many sources, agriculture, biomass etc.

It is no victory. It is the fad du jour. There isn't enough arable land on the planet to plant enough corn to make even a minor dent in the energy needs of the United States. The use of corn or other foodstuffs as fuel for transportation is driving up the cost of food in the U.S. and especially in 3rd world countries dependent on corn as a staple food. Farmers currently see a hot cash crop in corn for ethanol. The automakers see a chance to market a vehicle that burns "alternative fuel" to the clueless left wing environmentalists. A few hucksters (some of my co-workers included) see a way to make a fast buck standing up ethanol plants. The plants that can process non-food biomass e.g. switchgrass have some merit, but they will still never amount to a significant fraction of the energy needs in the U.S.

97 posted on 01/15/2008 7:28:46 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: dufekin
The diesel fuel market separates non-road diesel (heating, stationary engines) from road diesel (car, trucks). The road diesel pays a tax for road maintenance. I probably burn 10 to 12 gallons of gas a year in my lawn mower to mow two yards. My wife just put 13,000 miles this year on our new 2008 Mercury Mariner Hybrid at around 27 MPG. That about 482 gallons. The non-road use of gasoline is comparatively insignificant.

The habit of pilfering gasoline and diesel fuel tax for social programs and railroad programs is inexcusable. There is no need to raise the tax...just quit stealing it for illegitimate purposes.

98 posted on 01/15/2008 7:36:45 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

Comment #99 Removed by Moderator

To: dragnet2
Why not reduce or downsize government by say 300,000 employees?

That would eliminate what...half of this "commission's" staff & enablers, and hangers-on?

100 posted on 01/15/2008 9:39:11 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (God wants a Liberal or RINO hanging from every tree. Tar & feathers optional extras.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson