Posted on 01/23/2008 10:31:44 AM PST by jdm
I couldn’t support Rudy in good conscience. The man is the worst of the bunch, by far
Please!
You do know to post a “Barf Alert” in the title when positing pukeage like this, now don’t you?
MITT ROMNEY will be a much better conservative candidaate and will appoint conservative judges.
I would look to Giuliani’s strengths for who he might appoint.
For example, he is a big fan of policemen. Therefore, I wouldn’t look to any appointment to be drafting new Miranda rights soon. Most likely tough as nails on L&O issues.
Second, look to what he did to Times Square. This would possibly mean that he would fully support the Kelo decision for eminent domain. Guiliani like gentrification.
Third, relations with Mexico would pick up, as they hired him for advice on how to fix Mexico City. This could impact illegal immigration, trade, the drug war and gangs.
Sorry Rudy - not buying your pandering here.
First of all, he can’t appoint anyone, he can only nominate. And after the dem controlled congress rejects them, he’d just throw his hands up and say “I tried, here’s another Ginsburg”.
He siezed property without due process. He’s notoriously anti Second Amendment.
That’s not law and order that’s Jackboot Socialism.
Spit on the constitution, you spit on me. However, I forget ... few have ever read the constitution.
Stinking RINO’s ...
Sure. He had such a GOOD record in New York City.
This was a rational thought six months ago before Rudy tanked.
I don’t know if Rudy will be able to recover his campaign or not, but I do think he means it when he says he would appoint strict constructionist judges. I don’t see any reason to doubt it.
But in the real world, it doesn’t matter what the next President thinks about abortion. Whether pro-life or pro-abortion the President will have no effect on the number of abortions performed.
No way, who needs Miguel Estrada or Ted Olson’s opinions?
Let’s go with McCain he campaigns against conservatives, but we just know he does not mean it!
(LOL)
Rudolph also made promises to his several wives.
FGS
How many times is this BS balloon going to be floated?
With that OUTRAGEOUS and TOTALLY LUDICROUS logic--
just think how effective Hillary would be for,,,
the pro-life, pro-second amendment, anti-amnesty, smaller, leaner, less intrusive, less expensive government, anti-affirmative action, anti-socialized medicine, tax reduction and anti-nanny state advocates...LMAO!!!
You can't be serious.
Rudy made NYC a sanctuary city against federal law. Rudy sued the federal government for the right to protect illegals which included terrorists. Rudy lost, twice, in court and when he did he vowed to continue the policy regardless of the law or the court's decisions. So much for "law and order".
Rudy had a pathetic record as mayor for appointing liberal judges, most of them Democrats. He appointed openly gay and ACLU backed judges. Rudy stated how he admired Ruth Bader Ginsburg as a Supreme Court Justice. So much for judicial appointments.
Hi onyx, Haven’t seen you posting in a while. I guess this essay was worth posting, just to see you back. :)
Dang me, dang me
gonna take a rope
and hang me, hang me
from the highest tree
Oh, Rooty don’t you try
for me.
Uh, I am done. He would also go for taxpayer funded abortion, even said he would pay for one for his own daughter. He would march in front of the NAMBLA banner, he would not even try to protect marriage, he has proven he will go for gun grabbing, he has a personal life that resembles a sleazy soap opera etc.
I could add to that, but I am busy.
I missed that the first time. That is definitely ROTFLMAO material.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.