Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Message to Religious Conservatives: Giuliani Would Appoint Solid Supreme Court Justices
Patterico's Pontifications ^ | Jan. 23, 2008

Posted on 01/23/2008 10:31:44 AM PST by jdm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: jdm
I will not support a anti-life, anti-family, anti-gun candidate. That applies to Rudy AND Romney. Rudy enjoys the additional distinction of committing adultery on the taxpayers’ dime. Despicable.
41 posted on 01/23/2008 10:54:30 AM PST by kcubram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Since Rudy will never be president, it’s all moot and irrelevant. I am struck by the notion that a person can say they’re “not confident” that abortion represents, at the very least, a killing, but a murder because it is done for no other cause than convenience. Once unimagineable advances in medical technology have, as far as I can see, made such mythical fancies nothing more than positions taken without information. “Opinions” or “confidence” (or lack thereof) which are not supported by available scientific evidence are meaningless.


42 posted on 01/23/2008 10:56:54 AM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

I’m still hoping for a couple of SC exits this spring. One can wish.


43 posted on 01/23/2008 10:58:58 AM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Yep,,,,with that skewed, pathetic and unbelievably bogus logic...HILLARY WOULD BE THE MOST EFFECTIVE ADVOCATE FOR THE PRO-LIFE CAUSE!!!! Heck,,,,she would be even better!!,,,lol


44 posted on 01/23/2008 10:59:04 AM PST by stockstrader (We need a conservative who will UNITE the Party, not a liberal who will DEMORALIZE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr; samtheman
You have it backwards - he wants liberal judges who remove rights.

Sad but true.

45 posted on 01/23/2008 10:59:47 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jdm
It’s not just the Supreme Court that will be liberalized under Hillary/Obama but much of the federal judiciary. In their eight previous years the Clinton’s also stacked vast areas of the executive branch with partisan hacks and crippled the military and intelligence agencies.
46 posted on 01/23/2008 11:00:24 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

“It took Bill Clinton, a Democrat, to get control of the federal deficit.”
Huh?

A common misunderstanding. The TECH REVOLUTION, THE ECONOMY and the BOOMING STOCK MARKET CAPITAL GAINS REVENUES are what balanced the budget IN SPITE OF HillBILLery, NOT because of him.

Bill Clinton had none of the huge problems that faced the US after the dot com crash and 9/11. It was smooth sailing during his regime - just sheer luck.


47 posted on 01/23/2008 11:03:10 AM PST by AlanGreenSpam ("Celebrate Diversity! Look at the world with all it's problems - Isn't "diversity" so beautiful?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
He siezed property without due process.

Had not heard this, what property?

48 posted on 01/23/2008 11:04:08 AM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bob

I would be the best hall monitor because I am a child molester...


49 posted on 01/23/2008 11:04:13 AM PST by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jdm

“Message to Religious Conservatives: Giuliani Would Appoint Solid Supreme Court Justices”

The man would pay for the murder of his own grandchild but he wouldn’t lie to get my vote. Is that what I’m supposed to swallow here?


50 posted on 01/23/2008 11:05:19 AM PST by Grunthor (No Juan. No Huckaliar. Not primary, not general, not ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

He enabled Hillary by not running (for Senate) in 2006.

He’ll enable Hillary if he runs as the (R) nominee in 2008.


51 posted on 01/23/2008 11:06:36 AM PST by RabidBartender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: jdm

I like Rudy better than Romney.


52 posted on 01/23/2008 11:07:35 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RabidBartender

LOL Rooty is an enabler. I don’t think he seems too commanding in this race either. His debate performances fail to inspire and he seems more wimpy than tough.


53 posted on 01/23/2008 11:08:19 AM PST by dforest (Don't even ask me to vote for McCain, Rudy, or Huckster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jdm
" It took Bill Clinton, a Democrat, to get control of the federal deficit. (Sorry, conservatives, but it’s true.) "

No that's not true. The Republicans' era of the "Contract With America" was what brought the deficit down.

54 posted on 01/23/2008 11:10:03 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
but I do think he means it when he says he would appoint strict constructionist judges.

"Strict constructionist" according to what he thinks it means. Kiss the 2nd Amendment goodbye, and watch out for the 4th.

55 posted on 01/23/2008 11:10:27 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BARLF

Cars.


56 posted on 01/23/2008 11:10:59 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (And close the damned borders!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
As in drug dealers cars?
57 posted on 01/23/2008 11:12:47 AM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Rudy wouldn’t know a constructionist judge if he met one. Since Rudy has no clue about the constitution (especially where gun rights are concerned), how would he know if a judge is a constructionist, or not?

As for those who say he has good advisors... again, how would he know?

He made New York safe they say. Bahgdad was safe under Saddam (or so we are told). Police states usualy do have safe streets.

When defending his anti-2d amendment record on the Hannity show he clearly stated, on two separate occasions, that gun-control was a “states rights issue”. That is a fundamental misunderstanding of the Bill of Rights. But I am supposed to believe he will know a constructionist judge when he sees one and then stand behind that nomination when the Dems give him both barrels.

Not buying it.


58 posted on 01/23/2008 11:13:22 AM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Agree.

Gov. Romney Will Appoint Supreme Court Justice Who Are "Committed To Judicial Restraint." "As President, I intend to nominate judges who respect the separation of powers, are committed to judicial restraint, and have a genuine appreciation of the text, structure, and history of our Constitution." (Gov. Mitt Romney, "Governor Mitt Romney On The Beginning Of The U.S. Supreme Court Term," Press Release, 10/01/07)

Gov. Romney: "The judges I nominate will recognize, as I do, that as Justice Scalia once said, the Court ought not take the field as some kind of 'junior-varsity Congress.' That would wrongly displace the first-string legislature, drawn from our deepest pool of talent – 'we, the people.'" (Gov. Mitt Romney, "Governor Mitt Romney On The Beginning Of The U.S. Supreme Court Term," Press Release, 10/01/07)

Gov. Romney Will Appoint Judges "Who Won't Legislate From The Bench." "I will be a pro-life President. I will appoint and fight for justices who follow the law and the Constitution, who understand judicial restraint and who won't legislate from the bench." (Gov. Romney, Remarks At The Family Research Council's Values Voter Summit, Washington, DC, 10/19/07)

Gov. Romney: "I Think Justice Roberts And Justice Alito Are Exactly The Kind Of Justices America Needs." GOV. ROMNEY: "I think the justices that President Bush has appointed are exactly spot-on. I think Justice Roberts and Justice Alito are exactly the kind of justices America needs." ("Romney On Judges: Follow Bush's Lead," Red State Blog, www.redstate.com, Accessed 11/4/07)

Gov. Romney Praised The Supreme Court's Decision Upholding The Partial Birth Abortion Ban:
Gov. Romney Praised The Decision Upholding A Partial-Birth Abortion Ban. "Today, our nation's highest court reaffirmed the value of life in America by upholding a ban on a practice that offends basic human decency. This decision represents a step forward in protecting the weakest and most innocent among us." (Gov. Mitt Romney, "Statement On Supreme Court's Partial Birth Abortion Ruling," Press Release, 4/18/07)

All from http://www.mittromney.com/News/Press-Releases/Romney_Vision_Preventing_Judicial_Activism
59 posted on 01/23/2008 11:13:42 AM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Did Tommy Flanagan write this?


60 posted on 01/23/2008 11:14:57 AM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson