Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This one greatly surprised me. Is it much ado about nothing? I have very deep respect for McClintock and trust his judgement.

I've noticed several former Thompson supporters going for Ron Paul as the lesser of five evils. I can understand that and Paul is, as Ann Coulter said, "magnificent" on domestic issues. But can the Republican Party really endorse an anti-Iraq-War candidate?

1 posted on 01/25/2008 12:59:07 PM PST by CautiouslyHopeful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: CautiouslyHopeful
Amazingly, Paul is now a viable option for me, too, considering the rest of the field.

Never thought I'd see myself post that...
2 posted on 01/25/2008 1:00:48 PM PST by Antoninus ("Make all the promises you have to." -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful

If Paul wasn’t a moonbat on the war, I’d support him. I like everything else I’ve heard him say, but the war’s a deal breaker.

Fred Thompson is still on my ballot and I’m voting for him anyway.


3 posted on 01/25/2008 1:02:30 PM PST by Redcloak (Dingos ate my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful

...but will Kucinich endorse him?.......


4 posted on 01/25/2008 1:02:58 PM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful

Conservative does not have to mean support for aggressive Militarism. Sensible militarism in defense of US territory and US citizens and their property, yes. On this issue, Ron Paul is a strong as you can be.


5 posted on 01/25/2008 1:03:20 PM PST by ToryNotion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful
"But can the Republican Party really endorse an anti-Iraq-War candidate?"

It's a hard one to swallow but consider what you'll have to swallow with the other candidates. Remember wars end but federal programs never do.

6 posted on 01/25/2008 1:03:50 PM PST by antinomian (Show me a robber baron and I'll show you a pocket full of senators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful

Doesn’t surprise me at all. I live in McClintock’s district and have exactly the same feelings. My brain tells me that Romney is the next best choice since McCain ain’t a conservative. But my heart tells me that I like at least part of Paul’s agenda. Admittedly it’s only the domestic part and not all of that. Still, Rudy is a “no way” and I’m in mourning for Fred. Damnit.


8 posted on 01/25/2008 1:05:01 PM PST by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful

Insanity descends.


10 posted on 01/25/2008 1:06:46 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful
Even if this year's version of Paul's domestic agenda sounded wonderful - and it doesn't - his defeatist attitude toward the US war effort still rules him out.

And that's just policy.

In terms of practical ability to govern, he has demonstrated in Congress a complete inability to lead and to assemble consenus on any important legislation.

His inability to even run his own newsletter demonstrates that he has zero executive ability.

Ron Paul isn't fit to be mayor of a town of one.

12 posted on 01/25/2008 1:07:07 PM PST by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful

No, Tom, No!!!


13 posted on 01/25/2008 1:08:03 PM PST by RightOnTheLeftCoast ([Fred Thompson/Clarence Thomas 2008!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful

Ridiculous.


14 posted on 01/25/2008 1:08:14 PM PST by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful

I suppose in the primaries people can vote their consciences but I for one have a rather simple formula.

(1) Select all the candidates that I feel have a chance at the nomination
(2) Support the better man of that list until he is eliminated.

While I believe miracles do happen I don’t see Ron Paul in the cards.


15 posted on 01/25/2008 1:08:14 PM PST by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful
I can't stand to say this, but except for his international policy, Paul is spot on in much of his domestic policy. He's better on illegal immigration, better on taxation, healthcare, abortion, and monetary policy than any other candidate.

If only if he wasn't so loony tunes.

17 posted on 01/25/2008 1:08:55 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful
..the rest of the story...... "I don’t want to go too far. I am still looking."...- McClintock
18 posted on 01/25/2008 1:09:04 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful

Every day this race gets stranger and stranger...


19 posted on 01/25/2008 1:09:10 PM PST by chaos_5 (The Republic is doomed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful
No one expects Paul to win, but the more liberal wing of the GOP can't continue to trample on conservatives without some, at least, resorting to protest votes. Paul will surely gain from some of that.

This is just another manifestation of the fracture created by the loss of our unifying candidate and the void created by the candidates which remain.

20 posted on 01/25/2008 1:09:44 PM PST by Route66 (America's Main Street - - - Conservative Candidate Wanted... Conservative resume required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful

good grief


21 posted on 01/25/2008 1:09:57 PM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful
This tells me a lot about the remaining Republican candidates. Tom McClintock has earned the respect of Californians over the years. It was not bestowed on him because he has a R after his name; it was earned by him because of his thoughtful and consistent stands on issues.

This tells me that the standing field really IS as bad as I thought it was. God bless Tom McClintock.

26 posted on 01/25/2008 1:11:26 PM PST by Finny (FOX News: "We report only what we like. You decide based on what we decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Could it be, maybe, perhaps...

No facts here. Just speculation.

27 posted on 01/25/2008 1:11:58 PM PST by McGruff (Fred Thompson. The last hope for conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful

But can the Republican Party really endorse an anti-Iraq-War candidate?


Out of the total votes cast in the events held so far the Republican primary voters have shown no indication of selecting Paul as their Party nominee..... He’s received somthing like 6.27% of the almost 1.7 million votes cast todate.

So in answer to your question my guess is the party is not going to endorse an anti-Iraq candidate.......


28 posted on 01/25/2008 1:11:59 PM PST by deport (Go Florida... --11 days Super Tuesday -- [ Meanwhile:-- Cue Spooky Music--])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CautiouslyHopeful
Loony is as loony does.
34 posted on 01/25/2008 1:12:40 PM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatives live in the truth. Liberals live in lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson