Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o

What I noticed was the impression - which I’m not attributing to any FReeper - that normal sexual relations between a man and a woman aren’t “erotic.” The behavior of those who can’t have normal relations is “erotic” to them.


57 posted on 01/28/2008 8:00:10 AM PST by Tax-chick ("Gently alluding to the indisputably obvious is not gloating." ~Richard John Neuhaus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick
I guess people have gotten pretty far from understanding what natural marital intercourse is. For one thing, many believe contraceptive intercourse is still marital. Others will argue that sodomy is OK between spouses.

Why they would simultaneously be against homosexual intercourse eludes me: unless they really are just anti-gay bigots, after all.

58 posted on 01/28/2008 8:08:22 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Just for the record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick
I think the use of the term erotic, is meant to show that it is erotic to show these things to children. Just as porn would be. You don’t feed curiosity in young pubescent children, because they are yet undeveloped and unable to handle sexual relationships, physically, mentally, and emotionally. And yes, these images would be erotic to most kids.
93 posted on 01/28/2008 4:53:21 PM PST by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican! GoHunter.08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson