Posted on 01/27/2008 1:43:51 PM PST by presidio9
Don't stay hoem of that POS gets the nomination; vote Libertarian or some other third party to express your disgust and let him know what you've done. Tht what I plan to do if that POS gets the nomination.
I think that even NARAL is personally against abortion but....
Coulter repeatedly suggests in a Jan. 16, 2008 column that pro-lifers should let liberals help them pick their nominee. "The candidate Republicans should be clamoring for is the one liberals are feverishly denouncing... Mitt Romney."The suggestion that Ann was saying we should "let liberals help them pick" is absurd. Ann was making the common-sense argument that a person liberals hate is probably someone on our side, not that we should allow liberals to choose our candidate.
According to an interview in 2005, Romney bragged that his whole family was pro-choice "after an intimate family experience took place." He bragged that his mother ran for the US Senate as a pro-choice Republican, and provided the documentation.
That does not square with your hopes and wishes.
You have just expressed my exact feelings. We are in the same boat. Romney also appeals to me as a very smart business man as apposed to people like, say, Ted Kennedy who has sucked off of politics his whole life and never made a payroll or run a business. Or Hillary who has sucked off her husband (no pun intended) and is shouting about Obamas lack of experience when her only experience is being a crooked lawyer and the wife of a crooked politician.
Maybe you can buy a clue with the change you get back from Hillary or Obama.
No, you would have to be a fool to believe Romney will become pro-choice again if he wins the presidency as a pro-life candidate.
To satisfy your cynicism, I’ll point out that he would undoubtedly want a second term, and he’s smart enough to know what happened to the first president named Bush.
Would Thompson give Mitt bonafide conservative gravitas, a la Dick Cheney?
“Mitt is IT!”
You lose me, when you call Romney “pro-abortion”. My friend, extremism is not your friend.
Please don't put words in my mouth. I didn't say I believe that.
I choose not to trust him AT ALL to stay true on the issues he has flipped on (guns, abortion, marriage, family), as long as I still have a candidate in the race to vote for who has NEVER flipped on them.
what is the circle that lives around huckster.
It seems that pro amnesty judges will be just fine with keeping current abortion cases alive.
does not make huckster so valuable.
You should see this group's website and commercial
McCain is far more of a flip flopper than Romney ever even thought of being, and it’s either him or Romney on the Republican side, so it’s rather pointless to consider anyone else. It’s been that way since New Hampshire, actually, when they finished first and second. I pointed out at that time that one of them would inevitably be the nominee.
The nomination of Mitt Romney, if it should occur, will signal the Republican Party’s demise.
It’s a shame when people allow themselves to become single-issue voters.
The phrase 'single issue voter' is used to marginalize proLIFE voters. If you aren't a single issue voter, why don't you support Ron Paul? He is very conservative and great on almost all the issues, except his foreign policy will result in us getting our heads cut off. Its only one issue though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.