Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Talk radio on the Romney hook?
search engines start anywhere with key words ^ | 1-28-08 | Tigen

Posted on 01/28/2008 11:19:52 PM PST by Tigen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
No wonder Fred Thomson,Duncan Hunter and or any other candidate could not get traction. Furthermore and moreover Fox news, Rush, Sean, Laura,FReepers, dont think hillery doesnt know it cause I seen bill klintons name in the research too. You decide for yourself what this may or may not mean!
1 posted on 01/28/2008 11:19:53 PM PST by Tigen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tigen
Things were further complicated when one of the triumvirate decided he would rather play the part of a District Attorney on TV then a presidential candidate in real life.

Zzzzzzzzzzz...

2 posted on 01/28/2008 11:21:05 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tigen
Since when are Rush and Laura part of the "chattering class?"
3 posted on 01/28/2008 11:22:31 PM PST by Reaganite1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tigen

This is garbage. Romney’s not been with Bain Capital for 10 years now. I saw people try to connect him with the Chinese defense deal that Hunter tried to pin on him, but what everyone doesn’t seem to understand is how private equity firms like Bain Capital operate. The company itself does not have ownership that Romney would own a piece of. Bain Capital consists of investments are discrete and separate from one another and can each have an entirely different mix of investors. The fund manager (Bain) would control how the fund operates—a lot like how a mutual fund works.

The likelihood that Romney is an investor in the Clear Channel deal is pretty small, so no, Romney does not have talk radio on his hook.


4 posted on 01/28/2008 11:26:35 PM PST by VegasBaby (<---Just one of many who refuses to vote for McCain or Huckabee under any circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tigen

Your conspiracy theory would have made more sense if they had been supporting Romney all along, but they support him now because he’s more conservative than McCain or Huckabee, the only other primary winners.


5 posted on 01/28/2008 11:26:40 PM PST by aynrandfreak (The Left hates America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tigen; Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; lockjaw02; Mears; CSM; ..
Under Mitt Romney:

Mass:Taxachusetts Robs Lawyers Who Helped It Rob the Tobacco Industry

BOSTON – A lawyer for the two law firms that helped Massachusetts win $8.3 billion as part of the 1998 tobacco settlement accused the state Tuesday of breaking promises and penalizing the firms for being too successful.

The lawyers, awarded $775 million by an arbitration panel, have sued Massachusetts to recover an additional $1.25 billion over the next 25 years they say they're owed for negotiating a landmark settlement with tobacco companies. Richlin says this amount is equivalent to $17,000 for each hour they worked on the case.

More hands in our pockets.  How sweet!

Article Here

6 posted on 01/28/2008 11:28:41 PM PST by SheLion (Fred was the only one I cared for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tigen; Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; lockjaw02; Mears; CSM; ..
Under Mitt Romney:

First Massachusetts firefighter fired for smoking

Mass - 31 October 2002

"who is caught smoking tobacco products on or off duty."

click here

7 posted on 01/28/2008 11:32:02 PM PST by SheLion (Fred was the only one I cared for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tigen

I listen to all major talk radio and read 10 hours a day and have never found Romney described as a TRUE conservative .


8 posted on 01/28/2008 11:32:54 PM PST by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
The legal wrangling over the tobacco settlement had nothing to do with Mitt Romney.

This was something that occurred during the Clinton administration when state governments saw the inherent money spigot of frivolous civil litigation against legitimate corporate entities.

The ambulance-chasing parasites who initiated these lawsuits should have known beforehand that the government was going to get its take.

9 posted on 01/28/2008 11:33:27 PM PST by Reaganite1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tigen; Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; lockjaw02; Mears; CSM; ..
Under Mitt Romney:

Public smoking foes target the holdouts/MASS

that the public's health is more important than the bar or restaurant owner's wealth.

Mass is a FARCE!

click here

10 posted on 01/28/2008 11:35:18 PM PST by SheLion (Fred was the only one I cared for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite1984
"The legal wrangling over the tobacco settlement had nothing to do with Mitt Romney.

Exactly. I love how all the failings of Massachusetts now seem to fall squarely on the shoulders of Romney, even when if they had nothing to do with his policies.

11 posted on 01/28/2008 11:36:12 PM PST by VegasBaby (<---Just one of many who refuses to vote for McCain or Huckabee under any circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aynrandfreak
and the next best thing to Ronald Wilson Reagan....

Not a chance. I've heard no person say that.

12 posted on 01/28/2008 11:36:29 PM PST by Loud Mime (Life was better when cigarette companies could advertise and lawyers could not - me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tigen
Huckabee supporters, unite! Smash capitalism!

13 posted on 01/28/2008 11:37:05 PM PST by ari-freedom (McCain is consistently liberal. We need a change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tigen

I looked high and low in your post for some mention that Romney was recently endorsed by the NY Times but you left it out. What gives?


14 posted on 01/28/2008 11:37:55 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tigen

Fred Thompson couldn’t get traction because he blew his chance. The mainstream interest for Fred was HUGE over the summer, but he decided to wait to declare his intentions. By then, every other candidate was somewhat established. He also had a very lazy campaign. It might’ve worked in Tennessee, but nationwide he had to project energy. It was a huge mistake, and it was his fault.

Duncan Hunter, well, I agree with nearly everything he said, but he was unelectable. FReepers might scream over that, but its the fact, he was essentially Pat Buchanan with more sensible ideas. He was percieved as too far right by many and plus he wasn’t exactly known before the election. Hey, it’s just like Tom Tancredo, smart guys but not exactly known or big names.

We all know MSM hearts the left, but all those candidates have had doomed candidacies, one way or another.


15 posted on 01/28/2008 11:40:07 PM PST by ERJCaptain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

I like Fred ,Duncan, Mike, Rush,Fox news,and I will vote for who is on the republican ticket in november.


16 posted on 01/28/2008 11:40:48 PM PST by Tigen (Nothing new here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite1984

Oh sure. Defend the Mormon. Good luck!


17 posted on 01/28/2008 11:43:19 PM PST by SheLion (Fred was the only one I cared for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tigen
"...is still a silent partner in the company and, according to the governor’s financial disclosure, will continue to receive profits from Bain Capital through February 2009."

Oh, and by the way, obviously you have no idea what a "silent partner" means either. It pretty much means that Romney would have zero control over what Bain does.

Furthermore, of course Romney would continue to receive profits from Bain. What you fail to realize is that these residual profits would have been from investment funds he managed back when he was with the company (10 years ago!) and not any of the investment funds Bain entered into since that time. Really, you need to educate yourself on how private equity firms work.

18 posted on 01/28/2008 11:43:21 PM PST by VegasBaby (<---Just one of many who refuses to vote for McCain or Huckabee under any circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

“I looked high and low in your post for some mention that Romney was recently endorsed by the NY Times but you left it out. What gives?”

Maybe because it never happened? They endorsed McCain, and slammed all the other Republicans.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/opinion/25fri2.html?ref=opinion


19 posted on 01/28/2008 11:47:34 PM PST by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VegasBaby

All of these anti-Romney threads and smears are so yesterday. Yawn..... If a tree falls in the forest....


20 posted on 01/28/2008 11:48:46 PM PST by flaglady47 (The only one that stands between McQueeg and the Presidency is Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson