Posted on 01/29/2008 2:44:53 AM PST by JaneNC
I am not defending him.
For me it might come down to this old saying, “The devil you know may be better than the devil you don’t know.”
You ought to know McCain by now.
But it seems like you forget too easily.
McCain has been trying to work out a deal with the Democrats to switch parties for 7 years now, and they’ve finally reached one recently.
McCain denounces conservative judges like Alito and promises not to nominate any like him, and the liberal Washington establishment throws Hillary under the bus, clearing the way for an easy win for McCain.
He and his running mate Joe Lieberman will switch parties after an early high-profile fight McCain picks with the GOP leadership.
Then the majority Democrats pass his agenda.
Why have they agreed to this?
Because they see the writing on the wall about Iraq. They know they’re on the wrong side of history and all their candidates have painted themselves into a corner.
McCain switching parties is their way out.
They want to steal the victory in Iraq from the Republicans and claim it as their own.
This has to do with their long term legacy, because they are now very concerned about a repeat of the reputation they got after Vietnam, and this is their plan to avoid a repeat of it.
Maybe, but if you look at 1998, it was three votes on campaign finance reform and two on tobacco that put him "on the liberal side."
Take votes on his pet campaign finance issue out of the mix and the picture's a little different.
You don't want someone who's too erratic in the White House, and that counts against McCain.
But the idea that being the best follower qualifies one for the Presidency is a questionable one.
And Romney is any better?
Much better. He isn’t touting a 2.6 TRILLION dollar amnesty bill
The amnesty bill will never pass.
I would be much more comfortable having a Republican minority in the Senate fillibustering some of McCain’s proposals, than trying to fillibuster EVERY one of Hillary’s.
Romney is too Clintonesque.
Needs to be slapped. A couple of times.
“First, a rating of 82.3 is not really that high. It puts Senator McCain in 39th place among senators serving in 2006, ..”
Very interesting.
“McCain scored only 65, putting him in 47th place for that year. “ RINO Score.
McCain is up there with stalwart conservatives Olympia Snowe and Arlen Specter.
RINO MCCAIN DOESNT FIT - VOTE FOR MITT.
‘Michael Medved for one. I was extremely disapointed in his show defending McCain last week.”
FOLKS, ITS ALL ABOUT THE AMNESTY!
Theat is why medved supports mccain, he wants amnesty.
They are hiding the amnesty under the rug, and will pull it out once the pro-amnesty candidate is in the white house!
Just watch.
MCCain was 65% last year ... What he did in 1983 is irrelevent. he USED to be a conservative.
HE NOW is a RINO.
Better a convert than a traitor. Vote Mitt Romney!
A consistent RINO during the Bush era.
We CANNOT let this man be our nominee!
That's what John McCain is, and it looks like he is winning ... we will have a moderate vs liberal race if its McCain vs Hillary.
#1. nice resume bullet but we are electing a 70+ yearold RINO, the war hero guy was 40 years ago.
#2. Electability is bunk. He is old, not great on the stump, and his only electoral advantage is that he is so moderate, he wins more swing voters. But the base, like me, will not lift a finger for him.
#3 is BS, but the MSM covers for him like they cover for the Clintons so he gets away with it.
McCain clearly lied on the campaign trail about ‘getting it’ on immigration, then telling Russert he would sign the McCain - Kennedy bill if it came across his desk. He STILL advocates amnesty.
Lied also about Romney, didnt back down on his timetable smear although the pundits universally panned it.
straight talk my a**. Liberal pablum served up in a way where you can argue with it or you are a ‘bigot’ or a ‘loud person’.
RINO MCCAIN DOESNT FIT - VOTE FOR MITT.
It is our only chance...
VOTE MITT
“If the ACU could rate him on gay issues/abortion/guns/spending/etc, he would rank lower than Hillary.”
Complete BS on so many levels.
Romney consistently and publicly opposed gay marriage, worked to limit the effects in mass. (succeeded in stopping out of state couples from coming in) called on states to pass constitutional amendments and support for FMA. McCain not. Hillary not.
NRA gave Romney a B in 2002, and he is supporting individual RKBA.
Spending: Cato ranked Romney 15th out of 50 on fiscal responsibility - very high. same ranking had Huckabee at a miserable 45th out of 50.
and on it goes. Your comment is BS.
Romney is the clearly more conservative candidate compared with McCain. That is why pro-amnesty pro-abort and moderates vote for McCain and conservatives vote for Romney.
“I would be much more comfortable having a Republican minority in the Senate fillibustering some of McCain’s proposals,”
What a MORONIC comment.
How about NO TO MCCAIN and NO TO HILLARY both?
Why on earth would we work to elect a man only to have to rely on wimpy senate minority to stop his cosponsored McCain-Demcr*p bills?!?!?
With Romney we have a platform that conservatives can support 100%.
And quit trashing the more conservative candidate in the race. Roney is the least Clintonesque candidate in the race. Smart, articulate businessman. not a clinton. Its unbecoming of you.
Exit polls showed if only Republicans had voted in the Republican primary Romney would have won.
Romney has more conservative rhetoric, but a more liberal record.
There is not a damns worth of difference between Romney and Kennedy.
He is so phoney it makes my skin crawl. More phoney that bubba ever was.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.