Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Question to Those Considering Sitting Out or Voting for Hillary
2/2/08 | FargoRock

Posted on 02/02/2008 8:52:25 PM PST by Fargo Rock

Something has been bothering me all week and I'm hoping someone here can make me understand. Since 2001, we've been calling the Democrats a party of surrender, anti-war, anti-troops, etc. McCain has his faults. There's no question about it. But why are people like Ann Coulter, Tammy Bruce, Michelle Malkin and many here ready to hand over control of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the future of the War on Terror, and the care of our troops to Hillary Clinton? That's what will happen if people decide to either stay home or vote for Hillary in some kind of misguided moral protest. Don't our troops deserve better than that? It's throwing them to the wolves.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: clinton; democrat; election; hillary; mccain; politics; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-305 next last
To: MitchellC
Most folks here will eventually come around.

You're not listening, are you?

101 posted on 02/02/2008 9:45:15 PM PST by alicewonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: jpf
An excellent point, oh, wait, if Hillary wins she’ll likely have a cloture proof Democrat Senate and large majorities in the house. Nice thinking.

Not likely but hey, anything to scare people into voting how you want, right?

Sorry, a lot of things scare me more than Hillary.

102 posted on 02/02/2008 9:45:47 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

That’s difficult to even fathom!

Liberal activist judges, pardon-gate, FBI-gate, mandatory gubmint healthcare, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, and Clinton was a disaster when he was in the oval office I can only IMAGINE his loose with no job!

To think some want that AGAIN? HOW on earth?


103 posted on 02/02/2008 9:46:25 PM PST by tpanther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: jpf
I’d vote for anything with a pulse against her. Is that wrong?

Yes. You are limiting yourself to things with a pulse.

104 posted on 02/02/2008 9:46:38 PM PST by null and void (Conservatism. It's the new Black...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

“Sorry, a lot of things scare me more than Hillary.”

Like the dark?


105 posted on 02/02/2008 9:46:49 PM PST by jpf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: GregoTX

I prefer conservatives. By voting for a RINO, I might extend this problem into eternity.

I know I’m going to vote 100% republican in November. The only question in my mind is whether the top of the ticket will be a RINO or a republican write-in. 100% republican, so the republicans should be happy.


106 posted on 02/02/2008 9:47:27 PM PST by Kevmo (We need to get rid of the Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party. ~Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Fargo Rock

I won’t vote for a democrat or McCain. If Hillary gets in, which I doubt, so be it. We all know what we will get with Hillary. We don’t know what we’ll get with McCain except a broken GOP for years to come.


107 posted on 02/02/2008 9:47:49 PM PST by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camerakid400
http://michaelinmi.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/john-mccain%E2%80%99s-american-conservative-union-rating-liberal/

An exerpt:

Senator John McCain’s lifetime rating of 82.3% from the American Conservative Union is often cited as proof that he is conservative. Here is a closer look at that 82.3 rating.

First, a rating of 82.3 is not really that high. It puts Senator McCain in 39th place among senators serving in 2006, the latest year for which the ACU has its ratings posted online. For that most recent year in particular, McCain scored only 65, putting him in 47th place for that year. Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Chuck Hagel (R-NE), for example, scored 64 and 75, respectively, in 2006.

Generally, McCain has voted less conservatively in more recent years. His average for 1990-97 was 88, but was only 74 for 1998-2006.

[ … ]

So where did McCain differ from the ACU? The big areas were taxes, campaign finance reform, the environment and, most recently, immigration. There was also a smattering of support for trial lawyers; federal intervention in health, education, safety or voting issues; internationalism; and some social issues. He was more consistently conservative on spending and defense issues.

[ … ]

108 posted on 02/02/2008 9:48:55 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye Battle Cry
Any “conservative” that rallys to his banner as a Veep candidate (including Fred) is no true conservative.

Yeah, yeah, I know, just like virtually everyone here said about Bush in 2000. Then Bush picked Cheney. Bush, who all in all is probably no better than McCain. Both centrist suck-ups who'd sell the party out for votes, except for a few core issues, which I think McCain might even have Bush beat on, since McCain might actually veto something.

109 posted on 02/02/2008 9:49:48 PM PST by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel

Welcome to FR. I really like your screen name!


110 posted on 02/02/2008 9:49:50 PM PST by null and void (Conservatism. It's the new Black...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Williams

These are the SAME polls who had Rudy winning it all. Polls are BS. Basically you are down to 3 senators who have spent their life working in government and a former governor who actually successfully ran several businesses. There is an obvious ecomomic choice and it’s staring right at you. Do you really think any of the 3 Senators will change anything? Keep drinking the koolaid if ya do.


111 posted on 02/02/2008 9:52:07 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Bob Dole could beat Juan "Traitor Rat" McAmnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma
I am so sick of hearing the 'if we don't support the GOP nominee' rhetoric! We are in the position we are now because the GOP settled for someone who's allegedly electable, but only because he's more liberal than what a GOP candidate should be. Supporting McCain now will only reinforce what the fools running the party now believe- that in order to beat the Democrats, the Republicans must become more liberal.

And that is out and out bullsh!t. You do NOT advance conservatism by becoming more liberal. It never works. Rest assured, the GOP will never recover from this annoitment of McCain. Never.

Conservatives didn't choose McCain. He was chosen by the MSM, the RNC, the GOP good old boys, and the RINOs who support them. And yes, damn it, there's a great many freepers who are enablers to this pathetic line of reasoning.

So all of you out there, that fall into the categories above, go ahead, hold your nose and vote for McCain. I will proudly write in a candidate. But I will never, EVER, vote for McCain (or Huckabee).

If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.

And I'm tired of falling for the same old sob story. Hillary or McCain in the White House won't be the fault of those of us who held onto principle over pomp, substance over style... It will be YOUR fault.

112 posted on 02/02/2008 9:54:15 PM PST by rintense (You don't advance conservatism by becoming more liberal. Piss off McCain and Huck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fargo Rock

So, then you’re a single-issue voter?

WOT is not my biggest concern. # of deaths is. With WOT, we have maybe 10k dead Americans in the last 35 years. With abortion, it’s 500 times that.

The republican party knows that it can tilt the process in favor of conservatives, but chooses to tilt the process in favor of RINOs, log cabin republicans, social liberals, and Rockefeller Republicans. The WOT is just one of many issues that the republican party is using to tilt the process.

If WOT was your biggest concern you would have been supporting the best candidate for that all along, Duncan Hunter. And so would lots of others. But it isn’t their biggest concern.


113 posted on 02/02/2008 9:55:39 PM PST by Kevmo (We need to get rid of the Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party. ~Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC
Yeah, yeah, I know, just like virtually everyone here said about Bush in 2000.

Where is the link, to a few dozen of these threads.

114 posted on 02/02/2008 9:56:36 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Fargo Rock
Go to youtube and search for two videos.

AZ Town Hall with John McCain

Don't ask McCain

The second one he almost has a woman thrown out of the meeting .

This is not the kind of man I want dealing with foreign dignitaries or negotiating anything with anybody. Before I read all the negatives about him here, my only thought when he first came to the forefront was that he was too old and wouldn't have a chance against Hillary or Obama. Then I read more here and elsewhere. And saw how he smirked and behaved at the CNN debate. That did it.

No way Jose.

If Romney doesn't win the primaries, I will either write him in, sit home, or use the Ann Colter nuclear option and vote for Hillary , never imagined in a hundred million years I would do such a thing. My vote won't count in my state anyway.

I'd like to know how many anti-McCainites live in hardcore blue states where an R vote won't count but in the popular vote. We should really band together and try to vote some kind of grass roots protest and work for R seats in congress. There are many other conservative blogs on the web where people are saying the same things pro and con, mostly con, re McCain.

Most wouldn't go so far as voting for Hillary, and I think many will cave in and come around for McCain. I won't.

I give him credit for what he endured in Hanoi, but that was then, and this is now.

115 posted on 02/02/2008 9:57:19 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fargo Rock

I don’t care how pro-war you are, do you really want us to have troops in Iraq 100 years from now as McCain suggested? Just how much blood and money are we going to spend on a country that will probably end up being another Islamic state?


116 posted on 02/02/2008 9:57:47 PM PST by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fargo Rock

We didn’t swallow the amnesty pill, and we shouldn’t swallow the McCain pill either.


117 posted on 02/02/2008 9:58:25 PM PST by claudiustg (Sic Semper Tyrannus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fargo Rock

Conservatives staying home is like a kid covering his eyes in hide and seek. We need to go out and vote for Hillary or Obama .Let the country blame the Dems for what will ensue. The Dems are smart enough to let the military conduct the war and they lost on health care once before;congressional Republicans will fight a Dem President but not a Republican one. In four years, Mitt will be tempered by the fire of Conservatism and shoe in as the 2012 nominee. Result: no Dem will get the Presidency for many years...time enough for Conservatives to retrench their power. Worse case scenario is we lose a justice...Roe-Wade doesn’t get overturned so we work on a state by state program. We seem to be at our best when we are in the minority, guerilla-fighting the Dems. McCain is certifiable, an opportunist, a snake and in the end the GREATER of two evils.(excuse my circumlocution)


118 posted on 02/02/2008 9:59:33 PM PST by firefox ((Vote Democrat...Its Easier Than Thinking!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maneesh
The GOP and the country will be better off with him losing because the conservative movement needs o stay alive for America to survive as a nation long term.

Since I'm not clairvoyant, and don't know that there will automatically be a conservative backlash to Hillary large enough and capable of overcoming the massive damage she'd surely do to our nation, I'm not willing to take such a risk.

I'm also a hardcore conservative, but I realize that ALL choices in life are imperfect trade-offs. Some people believe the lesser evil is Hillary Clinton. I sure as hell don't.

119 posted on 02/02/2008 10:00:14 PM PST by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Fargo Rock

I have no intention on sitting out the election. I will show up and proudly vote to reelect Saxby Chambliss for senate. However, I can assure you that if John McCain is the Republican nominee, I will not for him.

I will consider it a case where I did not abandon the republican party, but rather the republican party abandoned me.


120 posted on 02/02/2008 10:01:24 PM PST by GAGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-305 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson