Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 02/05/2008 6:10:46 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:

Thread II: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1965578/posts



Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD Super Tuesday 2008
5 February 2008

Posted on 02/05/2008 6:10:39 AM PST by SE Mom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,101-1,111 next last
To: modest proposal

You should have took it, maybe even have asked for extras. It would have been one less for them to give out.


61 posted on 02/05/2008 6:57:29 AM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
Here's my report from Manhattan's Upper East Side:

On the corner in front of the school was one Obama supporter giving out pamphlets. Not many people stopped to chat.

You register without ID (they have your name recorded in a book) and give out Green tickets for Dems, Pink for Repubs.

Once in the lever-style voting booth, you see Green columns for each Dem candidate, including the Breck Girl. Looking way to the far right, you see one--count it ONE--Pink column for ALL the Repub candidates: Rudy, Duncan, Fred, Alan K., Mitt, Mike & John. If I am missing someone, I am sure he was there too.

It is a bit confusing to line up your candidate with the right lever--I cannot imagine an elderly person doing it with confidence--so it's best to count down in both the name and lever columns to make sure you are voting for the right person.

So who designed this system I wonder???

Thrilled to say I proudly voted for Mitt!
62 posted on 02/05/2008 6:58:15 AM PST by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

Ping.


63 posted on 02/05/2008 7:00:46 AM PST by khnyny (Quid Est Veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Threw my vote away? Fine.

No, not fine.

You did NOT throw your vote away. You voted for the man of your choice.

64 posted on 02/05/2008 7:01:23 AM PST by Petronski (I didn't leave the GOP. The GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
From what we’re seeing- the lines are likely for the Dems- they are extremely enthused this year :(

You are probably right. There are a lot of people in IL voting for Obama. BUT, what I thought was funny was there were several older people joking with the election judges about still being undecided even though they were in line to vote.

65 posted on 02/05/2008 7:04:25 AM PST by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

Good for you!

Hannity was on Fox and Friends this morning and he was asked about Huckabee’s latest claims that the reason Hannity (and Rush and Levin, etc) was supporting Romney was because Clear Channel was owned by Bain. Hannity laughed and said NO, that’s just not true then named who owns Clear Channel.

I just cannot believe that Huckabee gets away with the lies he spews in the MSM. The man is shameless scum.


66 posted on 02/05/2008 7:04:32 AM PST by khnyny (Quid Est Veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

LOL!

And for the record, I won’t use mine.


67 posted on 02/05/2008 7:05:29 AM PST by CottonBall (The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. (Henry David Thoreau, "Walden", 1854 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mama25
Well, damn. I wish I’d seen this yesterday. I was at the polls by 7 AM so I could vote before work and before the weather hits later today. The weather could play havoc with the Missouri results.

Does that mean you would've not voted because of the polls? (Remember, NEVER trust the MSM! ;)
68 posted on 02/05/2008 7:07:37 AM PST by CottonBall (The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. (Henry David Thoreau, "Walden", 1854 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

This will be my first presidential primary vote in Tennessee for me. Please explain how you vote for various delegates of the different candidates and what is the reasoning?

Thanks,
Betty Jane


69 posted on 02/05/2008 7:08:32 AM PST by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom; rintense; Laverne; maine-iac7; NordP; AliVeritas; silent_jonny; All

Mary’s (Matalin) Message to the Right
Social conservatives shouldn’t play into McCain’s hand.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YWRlMjkwY2FiOTM5OWIxYjE5N2E5NjU4MzAwMzkyNjc=#more

Conservatives are in a jam of their own making in allowing liberal Republican John McCain to become the party’s frontrunner — and it’s up to them to fix it. That’s the view of Mary Matalin, Republican insider, strategist, and former Fred Thompson supporter.

There’s still a chance for conservatives to rally and make Mitt Romney the GOP nominee — but time is running out.

In an interview with National Review Online, Matalin pulled no punches, arguing that, on Super Tuesday, “A vote for Huckabee is a vote for McCain.”

Matalin admits that Romney still faces an uphill battle against McCain for the Republican nomination. But his primary obstacle is the sinking Mike Huckabee, whose presence in the race Matalin finds questionable.

“Rich Lowry has said that Huckabee has a man crush on McCain,” Matalin said. “If Huckabee got out, Romney could win Georgia, Missouri, and probably Tennessee and Alabama. He could pick up a chunk of California, and then it would be a delegate race.”

Huckabee clearly can’t win, so why is he in the race?

“Whether it’s a man crush or the promise of a job — I don’t know what his motive is, but it seems to me that it could be less than pure.”

When asked whether conservative antipathy toward McCain is justified, given that most of his record falls within the GOP mainstream, Matalin explained why she thinks McCain is bad for economic and social conservatives.

“I don’t think he rests comfortably anywhere that conservatives would call home today. If it was true yesterday, it’s not true for tomorrow’s issues. The ones that he has chosen to take a lead on are the ones that conservatives either don’t prioritize or flat-out loathe,” she said.

“We are for tax reform, for aggressive immigration reform, for a traditional reading of the Geneva convention. We’re not for terrorist rights, we’re not against corporations, and we don’t believe that man is melting the earth.”

The prospect of McCain as the Republican nominee highlights a major missed opportunity for conservatives this season, lamented Matalin — who had been supporting Fred Thompson’s ill-fated candidacy.

“You reap what you sow. We like to applaud ourselves as the party of ideas and principle, but we turn out to be the party of performance art.

All we did was gripe about Fred’s performance skills as opposed to his principles and policies — and . . . here we are,” Matalin said. “We let the perfect — as defined by performance — be the enemy of the great.”

Fred Thompson would have been “a great candidate, a great standard bearer for conservatism, and a great president,” Matalin said, and his candidacy’s failure could mean that “we’re going to have to burn down the village.”

~~~~~

CLICK on “Stream” for the 2/4/08 Mark Levin Show and Mark
and Rush discussing Bob Dole’s letter to Rush:

http://marklevinshow.com/audio.php

His whole rant about McCain is fabulous (Huckabee gets it, too), but when you move the button up to 19:43, you’ll hear Rush call him about the Dole note.


70 posted on 02/05/2008 7:08:45 AM PST by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
The GOP can go destroy itself now.

It's in the process, no doubt. What with public schools indoctrinating a leftist agenda for decades now and the MSM, it's not surprising we're becoming Dem-lites.
71 posted on 02/05/2008 7:09:31 AM PST by CottonBall (The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. (Henry David Thoreau, "Walden", 1854 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

You won’t get any flack from me. You voted your conscience and that is a good thing.


72 posted on 02/05/2008 7:10:16 AM PST by Ingtar (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

About to vote for Dr. Paul in about an hour. Can’t wait!


73 posted on 02/05/2008 7:13:49 AM PST by rom (Deserted by Fred, I am now for Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jane

There are 12 overall delegates and 3 per county. However, more than 12/3 sometimes run for the delegate slots. You vote your preference for candidate and then pick the delegates you want to send to the convention. Most people will pick the delegates that match their overall choice. I voted Huckabee in the main choice as he is still in the race. However, Fred still could win this county, so I picked people that I knew would be good people to have at the convention.

State-wide, those 12 are split by percentage of the vote (with a 15% minimum showing required for delegates.) If anyone gets 66.6% (I think that’s the threshold) they get all 12. The same rules are applied county by county for the 3/county.

Here is the official:

Tuesday 5 February 2008: 39 of Tennessee’s 55 delegates to the Republican National Convention are allocated to presidential contenders in today’s Tennessee Presidential Primary.

27 district delegates, 3 from each of the 9 congressional districts, are to be allocated to the presidential contenders based on the primary results in that district.
12 at-large delegates are to be allocated to the presidential contenders based on the primary results statewide.
Delegates are allocated to Presidential candidates as follows:

If a candidate receives 66.6% of the vote statewide and 66.6% in each and every congressional district, that candidate receives all delegates from Tennessee.
If no candidate receives 66.6%, delegates are distributed proportionally. If a candidate receives over half of the votes statewide, they will receive seven delegates. The remaining five will be proportioned out among the other candidates receiving more than 20% of the vote.
If no candidate receives 66.6% of the vote in a congressional district, delegates are distributed as follows:
The candidate receiving the most votes receives 2 delegates.
The candidate receiving the next highest number of votes receives 1 delegate.


74 posted on 02/05/2008 7:16:47 AM PST by Ingtar (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Bawhahahha...that is simply wild! Can I borrow it?! :)

75 posted on 02/05/2008 7:17:08 AM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
voted for Huckabee. Then I voted for 8 Huckabee delegates...

A little-advertised fact of primaries is that if/when a candidate with delegates bows out, whoever they endorse gets their delegates. So, considering Huckabee's love of McCain and hatred for Romney lately, you could have effectively have just voted for McCain.
76 posted on 02/05/2008 7:17:24 AM PST by CottonBall (The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. (Henry David Thoreau, "Walden", 1854 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Wait, that can’t be right! Matalin is just a party insider who pushed Thompson as a stalking horse for McCain, right? Right?!


77 posted on 02/05/2008 7:17:59 AM PST by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: khnyny
I saw Sean, too, and was thrilled he brought this up. Did you experience the same type of voting booth favoring the Dems?
78 posted on 02/05/2008 7:18:38 AM PST by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

That’s why I picked Huckabee delegates that I know and trust. All delegates seem to be bound to their advertised candidate for at least one round of voting this time. Then they are free and not bound to vote for who was endorsed.


79 posted on 02/05/2008 7:19:48 AM PST by Ingtar (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Thanks for the report, Starwise. From Rush yesterday:

RUSH: ...I think the one candidate of the three still out there on our side matter (and actually it's just two, because Huckabee doesn't, in terms of a chance to win) in saying who more closely embodies all three legs of this conservative stool, you'd have to say that it's Mitt Romney. There's actually no choice in the matter. It certainly isn't Senator McCain.



One Candidate Now Stands For All Three Legs of Conservatism
80 posted on 02/05/2008 7:20:14 AM PST by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,101-1,111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson