Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New “A List” –If Conservatives Stay Home
Political Mavens ^ | 2/7/08 | Arnold Ahlert

Posted on 02/08/2008 5:32:09 AM PST by pookie18

Since many conservatives say they won’t vote for John McCain, and some say they’ll even vote for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, it might be worth looking at some of the people whose power and influence will be far more potent as a result of such pettiness. To wit:

–George Soros. A multi-billionaire with megalomaniacal ambitions. Financier of some of the most virulent lunatic-left organizations in the country. Just revealed as the chief funder of a recently debunked “study” by the British medical journal, Lancet, which claimed 650,000 Iraqis had been killed as a result of the war–ten times the actual number.

–MoveOn.Org. Do you like it when George W. Bush, a wartime American president, is hated more than the Islamic terrorists who perpetrated 9/11? How about when Gen. David Petraeus, leader of the turn-around in Iraq and man who has dedicated his life to the country is called “General Betrayus?”

–Michael Moore. Propagandist film maker, dedicated socialist. Mr. Moore has called Americans the “stupidest people on the planet.” Believes communist Cuba has a better health care system than our own. Given a seat of honor next to Jimmy Carter at the 2004 Democratic convention.

–Jimmy Carter. Worst president of the modern era. Never misses a chance to bash America, especially when traveling abroad. Says Israel is an “apartheid” state. Why? For having the “gall” to defend itself from ongoing Palestinian terror.

–The mainstream media. Already leaning left, already “massaging” any info that accrues to the benefit of conservatives. A Democratic Congressional majority coupled with a Democratic administration might be more than willing to re-visit the “Fairness Doctrine”–tipping the scales even further leftward.

–Hollywood celebrities. A deadly combination of brain-dead, America-hating, Hugo Chavez, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad-loving socialists. Sean Penn? Danny Glover? Barbara Streisand? Susan Sarandon? The list is endless–and gag-inducing.

–Academia. Other than Hollywood celebrities, no one embraces a dimmer view of American values and traditions than the “ivory tower intellectuals” who poison the minds of our youth.

–Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. A resurgence for the two race hustlers whose livelihoods depend on maintaining the black “victim of racist society” myth while shaking down guilty white liberals who head major corporations. With a Dem majority in Congress and an Obama or Clinton administration, bet the farm that “reparations for slavery” hits the front burner.

–Anti-war protesters/appeasers. Despite all evidence to the contrary, there are those who believe Islamic terror is an “exaggerated threat,” and that “nothing is worth fighting for.” 9/11? America’s fault. Atomic Iran? No big deal. Reactive better than proactive? Better an American city under a nuclear halo than continuing the fight against “peace-loving” Muslims abroad. One more domestic attack away from irrelevancy–but who gets to “take one for the team”–first?

–Conspiracy theorists. The Bush administration blew up the World Trade Center, the war in the Middle East is only about oil, Haliburton, et al, controls the world. ‘Nuff said.

–Enviro-whack-jobs. We don’t drill for domestic oil now, despite funding both sides of the terror war. Our economy is already shaky without global warming “mandates.” We’ve already lost incandescent light bulbs. That’s just the tip of liberal-inspired, environmental tsunami which would hamstring our economy for decades.

Supreme Court Justice “X.” Or maybe Justices “X,” “Y,” and “Z,” all of whom believe the Constitution is a “living document” to be “interpreted” as a means of securing “social justice.” Presidents come and go in four or eight years. A Supreme Court appointment is for life.

This is only a partial list. But it ought temper the “hate-McCain,” “stay home on election day,” “my principles or nothing” conservatives who are willing to bite the bullet and let the liberals take over. There are far worse things than a flawed candidate. The empowerment of the above would be a paradigm shift away from virtually everything that has made this country stand above all the rest.

Are conservatives genuinely ready–with spite as their primary motivation, no less–for THAT?


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; democratparty; elections; fundedbysoros; gop; hillary; juanhernandez; juanmccain; mcainnedy; mccain; mcmexico; mcstain; moveon; obama; shadowparty; soros
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-268 last
To: RockyMtnMan

Yes, you are in good company. Rush hinted at this on Friday when he talked about a McCain presidency.


261 posted on 02/09/2008 10:39:57 AM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Hazcat

Mr. Reach across the aisle would not pick a conservative for the Supreme court. He threatened to hold up Robert’s nomination remember because -horrors! Roberts was a member of a conservative think tank.


262 posted on 02/09/2008 10:42:04 AM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

The Dems do not have a filibuster proof senate right now. If we work to keep it that way, we can thwart a Dem president, but not a President McCain who will strong arm Repubs into going along with liberal legislation.


263 posted on 02/09/2008 10:46:10 AM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: pjd
"Sorry, you can’t frighten me into voting for McCain.

This kind of comment brings to mind the old adage, "Cutting off your nose to spite your face.""

I don't see it as that. I think this is more about, if the Republican party is not going to put forth real conservative leadership, why should we support RINOs? At some point, the Republican party as it is constituted today, needs to either disappear altogether, or move back towards actually representing conservatism.

264 posted on 02/09/2008 11:14:40 AM PST by Sicon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bronxboy
True, but as you probably know almost twice as many Republican seats are in play...

former Brooklyn boy

265 posted on 02/09/2008 11:25:34 AM PST by pookie18 (Of course I'm voting for the Republican nominee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

I know,but if we can hold the seats by turning out maybe just maybe we can stop the Dems. I see Huckabee is doing pretty well. Is it possible he might beat McCain? I don’t like Huckabee,but I could vote for him because of judges.


266 posted on 02/09/2008 1:43:23 PM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: bronxboy

Realistically, Huckabee can’t beat McCain. The 2 of them represent my 5th & 6th choices. McCain would have a better shot in November...


267 posted on 02/09/2008 2:01:05 PM PST by pookie18 (Of course I'm voting for the Republican nominee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

Ah well, then I might as well vote against Hillary in the Wisconsin primary. I won’t vote for McCain in November so it doesn’t matter.


268 posted on 02/09/2008 2:11:01 PM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-268 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson