Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Bolton endorses McCain
The corner at National Review ^

Posted on 02/09/2008 7:59:40 PM PST by byteback

"John McCain was very active and supportive during my confirmation hearings to be the U.S. Ambassador to the UN. His belief in me at that time was a testament to his courage to fight the liberals in the Senate and vigorously advance American interests at the UN.

"I whole-heartedly endorse John McCain for President because when he takes office in January 2009 he will be prepared immediately to lead us. John will not need on the job training.

"American conservatives will have a President they can be proud of in John McCain."

(Excerpt) Read more at corner.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008endorsements; ambassadorbolton; bolton; election2008; mccain; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-173 next last
To: MeekOneGOP

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/images/0605-04.jpg


141 posted on 02/10/2008 6:54:03 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt; txflake; seekthetruth; Redleg Duke; flaglady47; seenenuf
No, John Bolton and the "endorsers" are not "they" who gave us John McCain. Bolton, the RNC, the tooth fairy etc. did not "give" us a liberal candidate. Uninformed, swayed-by-the-media, RINO and crossover voters and apathy "gave" us McCain in the primaries.

No one held a gun to the heads of the presidential candidates of either party to run in the first place. As long as they have the means, the know-how and the blind ambition, anyone in this country can throw his name in the hat.....Perot and Keyes come to mind. So, nobody "gave" us the candidates to begin with.

Bolton is endorsing McCain because that's a part of politics practiced by big names of either party since George Washington.

Glumly experiencing what to us appears like our idols toppling with feet of clay is tough for us, but is de rigueur in the world of politics which is a business like anything else.

Probably a slightly dissimilar analogy is 5 executives being passed over in favor on a sixth becoming CEO of a huge corporation. The five deal with it even though they may be bitter. However, they work with the new CEO, get along with him, carry out his policies and support him for the good of the company. Also, endorsing their new boss may benefit them personally in the future, like a new position in the company or better income in the future.....and there's nothing wrong with this under our capitalist system.

This what politicians do......and will always do, whether they are elected folks or just well-known names in the political maelstrom like Bolton, Fred, George Allen, Schwartzkopf and other McCain endorsers. Huck will endorse, also. This does not make them "traitors" nor should their endorsements "shock" people.They are still good people and loyal to their party.

We as citizens should not become disillusioned with our leaders or politics in general because of the shifting sands we observe. The seductive siren songs to throw away one's precious right to vote or stay home should be resisted with all the will power one can summon. Political maneuvering and strange bedfellows are all part of the history and tradition of a representative democracy.

That we must always be alert and informed goes without saying. However, citizens becoming disenchanted and "dropping out" because of anger at "politics" is just what the enemies of any REPUBLIC want. Nature abhors a vacuum and history teaches us that the Left and/or dictators will always spring up to fill that vacuum when good citizens don't care any more and distrust or hate all politicians.

Leni

142 posted on 02/10/2008 6:58:39 AM PST by MinuteGal (Mitt and Fred are Still My Guys!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: prov1813man

Careful. Don’t blaspheme.


143 posted on 02/10/2008 7:29:44 AM PST by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Holy Moly! Make me want to snatch out my own hair. I don’t know how much more I can take in this fubar election.


144 posted on 02/10/2008 7:30:27 AM PST by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
We as citizens should not become disillusioned with our leaders or politics in general because of the shifting sands we observe. The seductive siren songs to throw away one's precious right to vote or stay home should be resisted with all the will power one can summon. Political maneuvering and strange bedfellows are all part of the history and tradition of a representative democracy.

And I can exercise my power by refusing to vote for a liberal. I'll gladly, and with clear conscience, vote third party before I vote for McCain.

I refuse to reinforce the negative behavior of liberal Republicans by cooperating with their leftward drift. No more.

145 posted on 02/10/2008 7:40:13 AM PST by ovrtaxt (The GOP is no place for a nice Conservative like you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: byteback

If McCain chooses Bolton for VP, I’ll vote for them.


146 posted on 02/10/2008 7:40:55 AM PST by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: byteback

I did not support McCain and was considering writing in Bolton’s name. I have to reconsider now.


147 posted on 02/10/2008 7:55:40 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John123

Bolton for McCains VP.

148 posted on 02/10/2008 7:58:23 AM PST by CJ Wolf (To Join or leave the offical Ron Paul 'let freedom' Ping, Freepmail me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: supercat; nicmarlo; Iris7; potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; MeekOneGOP
Trotsky was a loyal, ardent Communist. Why would Stalin dispatch a nutjob with an ax to terminate him in Mexico City in 1940.

One hundred million people were murdered to advance the left in the last century.

The New York Times' own Walter Duranty won a Pulitzer denying Stalin had starved ten million Ukranians to death.

The left has a job to do, to see that power is consolidated

Eggs will be broken.

Bon appetit


149 posted on 02/10/2008 8:43:23 AM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
The left has a job to do, to see that power is consolidated. Eggs will be broken.

another good post, Phil!

150 posted on 02/10/2008 9:18:11 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

You’ll take it and you’ll like it, fofl!


151 posted on 02/10/2008 9:18:59 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Not if I were dead and someone stole my identity. lol

I've been overrun more gray hair since joining FR and learning the truth about what's going on in our country as opposed to the lsm. Praise be for Miss Clairol.

152 posted on 02/10/2008 9:54:16 AM PST by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

Better gray hairs than head in sand....like the position of so many even here in FR.


153 posted on 02/10/2008 9:55:42 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo; devolve

Good graphic Phil


154 posted on 02/10/2008 9:56:58 AM PST by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Better gray hairs than head in sand....like the position of so many even here in FR.

Amen sister FReeper, amen.

155 posted on 02/10/2008 9:59:42 AM PST by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: hope
Because I trust the Devil to do what he does. McCain I cannot trust to do what he says.
156 posted on 02/10/2008 10:04:25 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: byteback

Bolton is a private citizen and can endorse a check from McCain if he gets one.


157 posted on 02/10/2008 10:08:05 AM PST by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; dixiechick2000
It just occurred to me that Bolton, who we liked so much, is losing his cape!!

You don't mess around with John?


158 posted on 02/10/2008 10:19:47 AM PST by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Having only one important thing that counts on his resumee as remotely conservative wouldn't even begin to suggest he is conservative, but, it would at least be one step in the right direction to trying to claim that he is. Not trying to split hairs here, but there ARE positions that even liberal rats take that can be claimed to be "conservative Republican" positions, but they are, by no means, neither "conservative" nor "Republicans" for doing so.

True. My point was that if there's any validity to the claims that McCain still is at least somewhat conservative, his batting average in clinch situations should be better than zero. If someone would be so kind as to post some examples of clinch situations where he was on our side, then it would be possible to argue the relative importance of those situations versus those where he was against us. But if his six-year clinch percentage really is 0.00 then there's not even any basis for argument: he simply is not conservative anymore.

I was by no means trying to imply that one conservative action in a clinch situation would make someone conservative--merely to imply that it's a useful pre-screening test. If I'm trying to decide whether a particular fruit is a pumpkin, I might first look at the color. If it's orange, it may or may not be a pumpkin. If, however, the it's purple it clearly isn't.

159 posted on 02/10/2008 11:15:00 AM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: supercat
My point was that if there's any validity to the claims that McCain still is at least somewhat conservative, his batting average in clinch situations should be better than zero. If someone would be so kind as to post some examples of clinch situations where he was on our side, then it would be possible to argue the relative importance of those situations versus those where he was against us. But if his six-year clinch percentage really is 0.00 then there's not even any basis for argument: he simply is not conservative anymore.

And I wholeheartedly agree with you, hence my proffering Senator Sessions who has indeed shown, not only through his record, time and again that he is a conservative, but he stands against the rats and liberals, and even liberals who call themselves republicans, to the point of even labeling through his ridicule as "masters of the universe." McCain has NEVER done any such thing.

160 posted on 02/10/2008 11:19:35 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson