Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Republicans Should Root for Hillary Clinton Over Barack Obama
North Star Writers Group ^ | February 11, 2008 | Paul Ibrahim

Posted on 02/11/2008 5:14:59 AM PST by Dukes Travels

Now that John McCain has virtually locked up the Republican nomination, most attention has been turned to the showdown between Democratic titans Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. And that’s good for Republicans. The longer the Democrats fight, the more vicious their battle will get. And the Democratic Party and nominee will be weaker for it going into November.

But at some point, one of them will make it out alive and turn this Democratic fury toward John McCain. Many Republicans hope that nominee will be Obama. The idea is, he’s young and inexperienced, and will turn out Hispanic voters in favor of Republicans – all of which is true. Others add that his black (well, half-black to be more precise) status and his full name – Barack Hussein Obama – would energize voters against him. This is less convincing, since the net effect of his color would probably be positive, but a legitimate argument nonetheless.

Despite these claims, Republicans should hope that Clinton becomes the Democratic nominee, and might want to do what they can to help her in what is now an uphill battle against Obama. And she could use the help – after all, promises of exceedingly hypothetical “hope” and wholly unspecified “change” are remarkably difficult to defeat in a Democratic primary.

(Excerpt) Read more at northstarwriters.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; barackobama; democrat; democratparty; democrats; elections; hillary; hillaryclinton; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 02/11/2008 5:15:03 AM PST by Dukes Travels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

Its time for Change... Change we can Believe in... Change for Change’s sake... Its time for Obama and if you think otherwise you will be labled as intolerant and hate filled, the reason for the division in politics because.. you will be assimilated.... Obama has the cures for all your ills, Obama has the answers for what ailes the world.. Oh glorious Obama you were sent to mend this great nation... Now is your time... Take your rightful place in the White House and change the landscape of America forever...

Obama... Obama... Obama... Osama... Osama... Osama...

hmmmm the uneducated, uninformed and youth fall for this crap? Amazing how Obama is allowed to use Civil rights era victim rhetoric to advance his campaign....


2 posted on 02/11/2008 5:23:20 AM PST by tomnbeverly (If Islamic Jihad is an existential threat then the candidate that should be POTUS is a no brainer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels
For quite a while (even after she stopped being inevitable) I thought that Hillary would certainly be president. Now, however, I think that Obama will get it.

Whoever is the Dem nominee, I think they will win very easily over McCain. Actually, I think a 50-state sweep is possible. And what I'm very curious to see is this: If a black man were elected president, if his margin of victory were historically high, if an old white war hero were defeated by a young powerful black man ... would America still be considered a hopelessly racist country in which black folks were oppressed and not allowed to get ahead because all white folks hate all black folks?

Democrats being who they are, I'm pretty sure that the song would remain the same.

3 posted on 02/11/2008 5:23:55 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

Obama is preferable because his opponent is coming to the end of a thirty-year plan to seize power and rule with an iron fist. There are literally thousands of regulators-in-waiting and judges-in-waiting, hand picked by Her Thighness, ready to overturn 220 years of Constitutional government and rule like Stalinists.

I have no illusions about Senator Obama - his ideas are every bit as bad as hers.

But he is not at the head of a revolutionary long-term project with international connections and thousands of ready-to-go commissars. She is.

If Obama is elected, powerful countervailing forces will oppose him and his own inexperience and probable incompetence will limit the damage. The President, alone, is not a dictator.

Hillary’s administration-in-waiting is a clear and present danger to the republic. Young Senator Obama, IMO, is not.


4 posted on 02/11/2008 5:25:29 AM PST by Jim Noble (Look out kid, they keep it all hid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels
But more importantly, Clinton would make a better president than Obama.

Stupidest political analysis ever. Clintons do not make good anything. They are perpetual candidates. The day Hillary took the Whitehouse, the fundraising and pandering would begin. You can't say what a Clinton will do before they have done a focus group anyway. Barak may turn out to be a crook and he may not. We know Hillary is a crook.

Every pro-America American should do whatever it takes to keep the Clintons as far away from power as possible. We must fight them in the primaries, fight them in the general election,and God forbid she is elected, fight her everyday she is in office. It is unlikely that John McCain could beat even Hubert Humphrey; it is almost impossible to think he can beat his friend Hillary.

5 posted on 02/11/2008 5:32:57 AM PST by Soliton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I agree Jim Noble!

It’s way too dangerous to play this game with the Clintons. The best time to beat the Clintons is the first available opportunity.


6 posted on 02/11/2008 5:33:56 AM PST by Iowamerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

This is how I see it as well. Not all liberals are equal. There are things about Hillary as president that are far more troubling than just her liberalism.


7 posted on 02/11/2008 5:34:10 AM PST by Dukes Travels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

I am almost considering voting for Hillary in the primaries if the GOP race is over.


8 posted on 02/11/2008 5:36:29 AM PST by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
It is unlikely that John McCain could beat even Hubert Humphrey; it is almost impossible to think he can beat his friend Hillary.

I think McCain at least has a 30% chance at beating Hillary, just because Hillary's negatives are so high. McCain has almost a zero percent chance at Obama unless Obama really blunders, which is still possible.

9 posted on 02/11/2008 5:38:39 AM PST by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Well said.

In addition, she will use her machine to cement her (and her successor’s) power such that American conservatism will never see the light of day ever again.

McCain or Obama will be 4 years of the flu. Clinton will be terminal cancer.


10 posted on 02/11/2008 5:39:24 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Here is what a President Obama will do to us. He will also have control over our military. We owe it to our brave armed forces, who are asked to do so much, to never let the Dems into the White House in 2008.

http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=28795&only&rss

h/t LGF

11 posted on 02/11/2008 5:44:36 AM PST by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

She must be stopped NOW! Can’t take the chance of it going any farther.


12 posted on 02/11/2008 5:46:02 AM PST by Sig Sauer P220
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

Clinton is the best candidate if you liked Lyndon Johnson. Obama is the best candidate if you liked Jimmy Carter.


13 posted on 02/11/2008 5:58:26 AM PST by DancesWithBolsheviks (Time to be a party maverick with my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

One possibility: Obama is clearly the choice of the majority of Democrat voters prior to the convention, and a quiet deal is cut: Clinton steps side in return for the promise of a SC nomination.


14 posted on 02/11/2008 5:59:56 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas

“Clinton steps side in return for the promise of a SC nomination.”
Now that you put it that way, I’d rather she be president.


15 posted on 02/11/2008 6:04:48 AM PST by DancesWithBolsheviks (Time to be a party maverick with my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kidd
In addition, she will use her machine to cement her (and her successor’s) power such that American conservatism will never see the light of day ever again. McCain or Obama will be 4 years of the flu. Clinton will be terminal cancer.

Absolutely, America will survive Obama, but may not survive those two criminals Clintons. Rapist-In-Chief in WH again.... I have nightmares every night now.

16 posted on 02/11/2008 6:05:26 AM PST by Anticommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels
"Why Republicans Should Root for Hillary Clinton Over Barack Obama"

Republicans should root for a conservative in their own party and not worry about which social/liberal the dims choose.

We have enough problem getting our "liberal leaders" out of the job of hand-picking our candidate for us.

Lastly, a conservative primary leader will pump all of us up and have a reason to get out and vote, not find reasons to stay home on election day.

17 posted on 02/11/2008 6:08:04 AM PST by zerosix (native sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DancesWithBolsheviks

Before that nomination fight was over, senators would have returned to beating each other half to death on the floor of the chamber.

IMO, you have to seriously consider the possibility though - politically Democrat strategists could see the nomination fight as a win/win.


18 posted on 02/11/2008 6:14:47 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Anticommie
I don't have nightmares, but I do feel we are defeated and the next POTUS, whoever it might be, will mean a lot of "changes" for the worse.

The way it looks seems to be: Hillary will get the majority of the female vote (at least the feminists and women who will vote for her just because she is a woman). Obama will get the majority of black vote - in his case, just because of race.

No matter how it might be denied, this campaign is all about race and gender for the Democrats. That leaves what majority vote to send McCain to the Oval Office? He does not have the conservative base supporting him; he has alineated the majority of the Republican party. Most blacks and women will vote Democratic (no matter how they are registered). With either of those two as the final Democrat candidate McCain just cannot win.

The GOP should have anticipated this long ago and solicitated a better candidate, or at least supported one who could win, i.e. Thompson or Hunter against the Democrats. Instead we were left with choices that have no chance in defeating the Democrats. We had too many candidates and none were exciting, new, or appealing to the audiences that Hillary and Obama have captured.

I am thinking this is exactly as the Democrats planned. Two polarizing candidates - yet, two who will actually unite all Democrats because of the vote either will bring to the party, while the Republicans are split apart and so fractioned they will never get the plurality in the final election. I think their tactic is working!

19 posted on 02/11/2008 6:26:56 AM PST by CitizenM ("An excuse is worse than an lie, because an excuse is a lie hidden." Pope John Paul, II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Absolutely Correct !!!


20 posted on 02/11/2008 6:35:48 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Hillary = Senator Incitatus, Clintigula's whore...er, horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson