The Clintons and NAACP vs Sharpton and Obama
1 posted on
02/13/2008 7:37:25 AM PST by
IrishMike
To: IrishMike
This is wonderful news. Think how delicious it would be if Florida and Michigan would change the result. The beast fights to include them and wins. The party is torn apart. Blacks and Obama groupies stay home.
2 posted on
02/13/2008 7:40:46 AM PST by
Minn
(Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
To: IrishMike
"victims of the Republican legislature in Florida"The Dems make the decision not to count those states yet it is still the fault of those mean Republicans. Amazing.
3 posted on
02/13/2008 7:42:39 AM PST by
Rokurota
(.)
To: IrishMike
I would love to see the NAACP take the nomination away from Obama. (not that I am in favor of Hillary, mind you).
Let the games begin !!!
4 posted on
02/13/2008 7:42:47 AM PST by
AbeKrieger
(There is a special place in Hell for Lyndon Johnson.)
To: IrishMike
H I L L A R Y is desperate!
6 posted on
02/13/2008 7:43:11 AM PST by
evad
(.I.)
To: IrishMike
It struck me as making the voters, including minority voters in Florida particularly, victims of the Republican legislature in Florida. I wanted to get Chairman Dean to find some way to rectify the situation, Bond said. Hey Julian. Florida changed the date of the primaries. It had no control over what your Democrat Plantation Party did to "disenfranchise" minority voters by Herr Dean relegating Florida Democrat delegates to the trash heap.
You can take that up with Dean alone, dumbass.
7 posted on
02/13/2008 7:43:12 AM PST by
VeniVidiVici
(Benedict Arnold was against the Terrorist Surveillance Program)
To: IrishMike
Yes, it would be wonderful if the Clintonistas manage to steal the nomination with the superdelegates, the Florida delegates and the Michigan delegates!
8 posted on
02/13/2008 7:44:15 AM PST by
Sooth2222
("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
To: IrishMike
NAACP = National Association for the Advancement of Clinton People?
10 posted on
02/13/2008 7:45:36 AM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Rattenschadenfreude: joy at a Democrat's pain, especially Hillary's pain caused by Obama.)
To: IrishMike
Clinton, Inc. will be the nominee, no matter who wins the primaries.
Or else.
13 posted on
02/13/2008 7:49:50 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: IrishMike
Why wouldn’t he ask for a re-vote? He is clearly in the pocket of the Clintons.
Their desperation is showing.....and this would NEVER go over well with the populace.
15 posted on
02/13/2008 7:50:49 AM PST by
Red in Blue PA
(Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
To: IrishMike
In the VA Dem primary yesterday one of the exit poll questions was: If your candidate does not win the nomination, will you vote for the nominee? 39% of the Hillary voters said they’d vote for Obama. 16% of Obama’s voters said they would vote for Hillary.
She will lose in Nov. if she wins the nomination with her dirty tactics.
To: IrishMike
It is fascinating that many of the old-line black establishment are lining up behind Hillary against the first legitimate black candidate in history. Why? I think it’s because if Obama is elected, it will make the old-guard seem like the dinosaurs that they are. With a black president, how could they continue to say that America is the incurably racist society they claim it is? It will seriously undermine their race-baiting game.
18 posted on
02/13/2008 7:55:05 AM PST by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: IrishMike
Let me check my list here...
1. The Republicans are running a liberal
2. I have a liberal Democrat friend that is a McCain supporter.
3. I have a conservative Republican friend that says Obama is a better choice than McCain.
4. Now we have the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People shilling against the black candidtate.
Seriouslly, SOMEBODY WAKE ME UP!!
21 posted on
02/13/2008 7:58:20 AM PST by
CougarGA7
(Wisdom comes with age, but sometimes age comes alone.)
To: IrishMike; Congressman Billybob
As we theorized yesterday, it is POSSIBLE this could end up in court, with Obama blocking, citing . . .
BUSH V. GORE!
Watch the textbooks get re-written overnight if that happens to say what a brilliant decision Bush v. Gore was.
Now, FWIW, Congressman Billybob, who wrote an amicus brief for BvG, says that the person with the delegates will control the committees, which will control the ruling on these states, i.e., Obama is set.
23 posted on
02/13/2008 8:24:08 AM PST by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: IrishMike
Is Bond one of the guys who received a lot of money (contracts, etc.) to endorse the ‘Toons?
30 posted on
02/13/2008 9:17:46 AM PST by
fightinJAG
(Rush was right when he used to say: "You NEVER win by losing.")
To: IrishMike
I guess we know who butters Julian Bond’s bread....
31 posted on
02/13/2008 9:19:28 AM PST by
Antoninus
(Looks like 2008 could be McCain vs. Hussein.)
To: Mrs Zip
34 posted on
02/13/2008 9:48:31 AM PST by
zip
(((Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough become truth to 48% of all Americans (NRA)))))
To: IrishMike
I love trouble in the enemy’s tent.
36 posted on
02/13/2008 11:28:59 AM PST by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatives live in the truth. Liberals live in lies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson