Skip to comments.
POLL: OBAMA TAKES LEAD IN TEXAS (up 6 points)
American Research Group ^
Posted on 02/15/2008 8:28:48 AM PST by libh8er
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-138 next last
To: libh8er
101
posted on
02/15/2008 9:47:01 AM PST
by
Homer1
To: Grunthor
To: Lurker
If Hillary loses Texas things will get really ugly really fast.No. Things will get really ugly starting right about now. The Clintons cannot afford to lose Texas, if they lose Texas, it's over.
103
posted on
02/15/2008 9:51:05 AM PST
by
SamAdams76
(I am 1 days away from outliving George Reeves)
To: AbeKrieger
Great shot. Is it real, or is it Photoshop (no, not the bubble part)?
104
posted on
02/15/2008 10:00:26 AM PST
by
Ancesthntr
(An ex-citizen of the Frederation trying to stop Monica's Ex-Boyfriend's Wife from becoming President)
To: libh8er
Source: Real Clear Plitics
Clinton Obama
RCP Average 02/11 - 02/14 50.3 40.0
Rasmussen 02/14 - 02/14 54 38
InsiderAdvantage 02/14 - 02/14 48 41
TCUL/Hamilton 02/11 - 02/13 49 41
These polls will change and most likely tighten up as they are just now getting ramped up in Texas with ads and rallies.
105
posted on
02/15/2008 10:02:04 AM PST
by
deport
( -- Cue Spooky Music --)
To: WillVoteForFood
Terrible ads altogether, but Hillary's is the worst
That's what you get when you are trying to appeal to brain dead democrats
106
posted on
02/15/2008 10:05:32 AM PST
by
uncbob
(m first)
To: libh8er
Lots of pubs are going to crossover to vote for Obama. McCain may not win very big as a result. JMO
107
posted on
02/15/2008 10:06:45 AM PST
by
Hattie
To: ChocChipCookie
Arent the Texas and Ohio primaries on March 4? A lot can happen between now and then.
Early voting in TX starts the 19th Feb.
108
posted on
02/15/2008 10:11:05 AM PST
by
Hattie
To: Jedidah
I did the same as you in NJ as McCain had it won and Romney wouldn’t get close but I disagree with voting for Shrillary, ever.
I must attempt to dissuade you from supporting this ultimate evil.
We will undress Barack when the time is right. But to support the corrupt Clintons and aid in a proportional distribution of delegates by supporting the Beast is wrong.
We must not do anything to give daylight to the Clinton vampires.
To: libh8er
Yes, I read the Rasmussen page. When did they conduct it? I may have missed the actual polling dates. My sense is that this doesn’t fit the political reality of a three day polling starting Wednesday after the Potomac massacre.
To: libh8er
I think Texas will go for Obama.
111
posted on
02/15/2008 10:33:57 AM PST
by
TexanToTheCore
(If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
To: LS
The democrats do not have all or nothing states, it is all proportional based on the popular vote.
112
posted on
02/15/2008 10:37:20 AM PST
by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
To: America-The-Great-1967
Disagree, for many reasons Obama will be the easier candidate to beat in November. Not only do I believe that McCain will win, I think it will be a lopsided victory for him. You are distinctly in the minority on this. I have detailed numerous reasons for this. Plus the "X" factor of youth vs. crotchety oldness runs heavily in Obama's favor. Also your analysis discounts the poll numbers on the Iraq War. McCain is already being widely ridiculed for his "100 years" and "10,000 years" comments regarding troops in Iraq. But these are trivialities. The main thing is that a comeback for Clinton will dispirit the activist troops on their side, which will give us a fighting chance in Nov.
To: Alter Kaker
Someone on TV mentioned something similar to what you just said but I could not understand exactly what he meant? Do you mean that the districts where black voters are concentrated have more delegates than the districts where the Hispanic voters are concentrated?
114
posted on
02/15/2008 10:46:51 AM PST
by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
To: libh8er
115
posted on
02/15/2008 10:49:49 AM PST
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
What I noticed is that most polling firms are only polling registered or likely democrats voters and not polling a lot of independents who for sure can vote in both Ohio and Texas democrat primaries and they are going to vote in large numbers.
116
posted on
02/15/2008 10:51:02 AM PST
by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
To: Jedidah
If she wins Texas and Ohio in large percentage she is going to be the democrat nominee without any fight at the convention. It would be a huge mistake if you vote for her. She must behind Obama by 150-200 pledged delegates going to the convention so there will a real fight and division, if she is close in delegates then the nomination is hers very easily.
117
posted on
02/15/2008 10:55:16 AM PST
by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
To: jveritas
This means Hillary is in deep trouble. She may win, but isn’t going to win big enough to stop Hussein.
118
posted on
02/15/2008 10:55:42 AM PST
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: Richard Kimball
What you are doing is absolutely correct. Hillary Clinton must win Texas and Ohio by big margins so she will remain at least 150 delegates behind Obama going to the convention and so we can get a real fight and division that will destroy the democrats for decades. If she wins Texas and Ohio by big margins and get close to him in the delegates she is going to be the democrat nominee without any fight.
119
posted on
02/15/2008 11:01:37 AM PST
by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
To: jveritas
Do you mean that the districts where black voters are concentrated have more delegates than the districts where the Hispanic voters are concentrated? Yes, because delegate apportionment is based on Democratic turnout in the last election, and voter turnout has historically been very low in a number of heavily Hispanic areas. So even if record number of Hispanics do turn out in San Antonio, the Rio Grande Valley and other areas, their districts won't get any more delegates.
120
posted on
02/15/2008 11:04:07 AM PST
by
Alter Kaker
(Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-138 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson