Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should You Prepay Your Mortgage
Brian Preston "the money guy" ^ | 2-11-08 | Brian Preston

Posted on 02/15/2008 10:48:40 PM PST by RKBA Democrat

Have you ever wondered if you should prepay your mortgage? In today's show I give you the information to make an informed decision based upon your personal situation. We take into account the analytical side of the decision as well as the emotional relief that can come from being DEBT FREE….

The analytical side of the discussion comes from a great article in this month's Consumer Reports titled «Your Mortgage It Rarely Pays to Prepay»

as you can probably see from the title of the article that most people should not prepay and instead use the money to invest. I think that Consumer Reports did a great analysis, but remember paying off your house versus investing in the stock market has many different factors beyond a simple math calculation. Depending on your personal risk threshold there are people that would prefer to be debt-free for the psychological satisfaction rather than maximize the earning potential of their investment portfolio. In today's show I give you my insight to help you determine where you fall in this decision.

A few key facts from the Consumer Reports article…

When comparing paying $100 extra each month towards your mortgage balance or investing in a S&P 500 Index Fund Consumer Reports provided the following results: After 10 years the S&P 500 investment on average produced a gain of $10,058 vs. $4,051 from the added mortgage payment In about a 1/3 of the 10 year periods analyzed, paying down the mortgage produced a better return. However, the difference was pretty meager ranging from $1 to $2,799 of an advantage for prepaying your mortgage. When the S&P 500 investment beat the prepayment, it did so by $70 to $16,763 It should be noted that when you extended the analysis out to a 15 and 20 year period of home ownership, the S&P 500 investment had the advantage 100% of the time. The average dollar gains from the stock investment grew from $10,058 in the 10 year analysis to $19,613 in the 15 year and $41,931 in the 20 year analysis. Please note that this was primarily a mathematical calculation and there is much more that should go into your decision of prepaying your mortgage. You should also take into account:

Your risk profile

Your tax situation (if you make enough money that the Mortgage Interest Deduction is reduced or eliminated by AMT tax then you have more to consider)

How close you are to retirement

Upcoming cash needs (investments are much more liquid then real estate)

Peace of Mind factor…

**Fund Managers are using this time of volatility to welcome new investors**

I also wanted to let you know that with all of the volatility in the financial markets there are some very well know Mutual Funds that have been closed to new investors for a number of years that have reopened to new investors. Below I have provided links, so that you can research each of these options:

Dodge and Cox Stock (DODGX) and Balanced Fund (DODBX) - Large Cap Value Fund First Eagle Global (SGIIX) and Overseas (SGOIX) - Global and International Equities Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund (RYLPX) and Royce Opportunity Fund (RYPNX) - Small Cap Investments Thanks and see you next week!


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News
KEYWORDS: mortgage; survivingsocialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
In my opinion, Consumer Reports is mostly wrong on this. One thing that I'm surprised that Brian Preston didn't mention in his review was market risk and volatility. Stocks are riskier than investments in say bonds or CD's (which are more similar to mortgages as financial instruments). Over time the market generally compensates for risk, so of course you're going to earn a higher rate of return on stocks over an extended time horizon. If you were to take that $100 per month and put it into an investment that had a more comparable level of risk and volatility such as a a CD, the interest earned on that CD would likely be much less than you would pay in mortgage interest.

I take a philosophical approach closer to that of Dave Ramsey when it comes to debt. It's less stressful to be debt free.

Mr. Preston's weekly podcast is pretty good, and you can get it on i-tunes for free.

1 posted on 02/15/2008 10:48:41 PM PST by RKBA Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freespirited; oblomov; Jet Jaguar; wastedyears; nascarnation; Henry Belden; petercooper
Surviving Socialism Pinglist
Stories and tips with a financial emphasis to help conservatives prosper during difficult times.

To be added or taken off this list, please send a FR mail to RKBA Democrat

2 posted on 02/15/2008 10:50:29 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

“If you were to take that $100 per month and put it into an investment that had a more comparable level of risk and volatility such as a a CD, the interest earned on that CD would likely be much less than you would pay in mortgage interest.”

completely agree, and that is BEFORE taxes on said interest.. only possible area of interest to me would be inflation so great that it inflated one’s wages far beyond whatever future earnings value you expected compared to mtg payments, but even given a gross devaluation of the dollar, hard to see wages inflating that fast.


3 posted on 02/15/2008 10:55:26 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

“only possible area of interest to me would be inflation so great that it inflated one’s wages far beyond whatever future earnings value you expected compared to mtg payments, but even given a gross devaluation of the dollar, hard to see wages inflating that fast.”

I sorta doubt that the late 70’s will repeat. Our grandparents and great-grandparents were correct in their skepticism towards debt.


4 posted on 02/15/2008 11:01:32 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

I agree with you. I mean, home debt is the best debt to have, but still, you don’t throw a party when you GET the mortgage, you throw it when you pay it off!


5 posted on 02/15/2008 11:08:26 PM PST by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

ping


6 posted on 02/15/2008 11:10:03 PM PST by dellbabe68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

You should borrow on your house if you need to fund a Roth IRA. Frankly, if you can borrow at 7%, at the 30% tax bracket, you only need 4.9% return to break even on an after tax basis. Frankly, you can even lose money pretax and make money after tax.

Did I mention that the IRS and US tax code is idiotic and stupid ?

Even better would be if someone started a Roth bank which would only have one line of business. You could get a loan at 10% if you maintained a roth ira cd at the same bank for the same amount which also paid 10%. The bank has zero risk, zero profit, but all the “depositors” make 3% after tax and risk free.

Did I mention that the IRS and US tax code stinks ?


7 posted on 02/15/2008 11:20:16 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
They missed another point - what if you loose your job?

If you have prepaid, the bank / mortgage holder may be more likely to work with you.

I got my house paid off the same month as I was laid off (after 10 years and no notice) - made a big difference the ‘after’ part.

I look at it as the house is now paying me $1K a month in rent avoidance.....in other words I can afford to take a job that pays less (and offers more satisfaction) without the monthly rent payment hanging overhead.

8 posted on 02/15/2008 11:22:03 PM PST by ASOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
I bought my house with a 30 year mortgage and am paying off on a 15 year schedule. I have about 3 years left. If I had some trouble, or lost my job, I could have always reverted back to the 30 year payment schedule. I’ve had to retire about 5 years sooner than I planned, but have kept up the overpayments anyway. If I had financed for the 15 year period, I would have saved about a quarter % or so, but I would have had to refinance if I ran into problems. I believe I did the right thing.

If you don't have the discipline to stay on schedule, then I would go with the 15 year plan. So many people take the 30 year plan so they can get more toys. Spending the extra money on a bigger truck or a boat or something just means you could have paid your house off sooner, but you felt it was more important to have a $30k boat, or a $50k truck. That would be about the interest difference you would pay for the extra 15 years.

9 posted on 02/15/2008 11:34:58 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
I definitely lean towards the pay if off end.

The previous house my wife and I owned we bought in the late 80’s. We paid it off in about 15 years. We sold it last July after the housing market had already taken a dive and in spite of that, all said and done, we lived in the house for free for nearly 20 years including all payments, taxes, and maintenance. Everything we put into it we got back and then some.

You get more than just savings on interest which is considerable. You get the appreciation of the asset while you live in it. And last by not least, there’s a big weight lifted off your mind when you are debt free and are not constantly under the gun.

Unfortunately I'm in debt again... A new home that we built the way we wanted... So now I'm working on paying it off all over again only this time about 2/3rds is already paid off...

10 posted on 02/16/2008 12:24:37 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

You mention Ramsey. One of his reasons for advocating home payoff is if something happens like eternal job loss or extreme illness, they can’t take your home because it’s paid for. Once paid for your only expense is taxes and upkeep and if wise insurance. For most, a significantly lower cost than if you add in principal and interest. It also encourages you to use the KISS method in your life. The simpler, the easier to stay out of trouble.


11 posted on 02/16/2008 12:41:53 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
All your points are wise, just like our grandparents. Years ago when most people had gardens in rural USA, they put up (canned) extra with the goal being about twice what they would need for a winter / year.

That way, they would have insurance next summer, if drought, disease, hail storm or insects decimated their garden harvest.

Very important if a couple had 2-4 or more kids they were raising.

12 posted on 02/16/2008 1:14:59 AM PST by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
You mention Ramsey. One of his reasons for advocating home payoff is if something happens like eternal job loss or extreme illness, they can’t take your home because it’s paid for. Once paid for your only expense is taxes and upkeep and if wise insurance.

While there have been times when my "financial modeling" indicated that taking out a mortgage made for a higher overall return..., I prefer to have one less major concern in my life!

My Daughters have commented several times that we are the only people they know without a mortgage BUT..., both are proceeding to "join the club" as soon as they can!

Debt is a "necessary evil" at times but, other than in terms of income generating pursuits..., it should be avoided!

13 posted on 02/16/2008 2:09:13 AM PST by ExSES (the "bottom-line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
Our grandparents and great-grandparents were correct in their skepticism towards debt.

A wizened old man who had lived through the Great Depression told me, "Don't underestimate the importance of owning your home. In tough times, you want to own a roof."

14 posted on 02/16/2008 2:53:43 AM PST by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

They missed another point - what if you loose your job?

THAT is one big point that always seems to be missed. IMO- mortgages are not beneficial to the person who has to pay, it is only beneficial to the lender. People tell me about the "tax write-off" or some other silly benefit they get from having a mortgage, and I laugh. What they mean to say is: I never did the math required to determine how much I would have to pay over the life of the mortgage that has a minimum down payment.

It's always better to pay it off as soon as possile.

15 posted on 02/16/2008 3:24:00 AM PST by Sarajevo (You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

no debt is good debt

we paid off years ago -


16 posted on 02/16/2008 3:27:16 AM PST by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

WTF is “prepaying your mortgage”?

Is that the same as BUYING?


17 posted on 02/16/2008 3:31:58 AM PST by djf (I think McCain deserves a chance. After all, he is on R side!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

I got a better idea. Sell the house, get a much smaller one with a lesser mortgage and pay that off in double time. Better still, get a house with no mortgage and stay away from debt thereafter.

It beats a Posturepedic!


18 posted on 02/16/2008 3:50:17 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( Peel back tabs for tagline. Do not remove this label. Obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo; ASOC
It's always better to pay it off as soon as possile.

Actually its not always better.

Suppose I got a $100 raise. Among the options I considered was putting the $75 I received after taxes into a house payment or putting the $100 pretax into a 401k in a bond fund paying an interest rate identical to my mortgage or putting the $75 after tax into a Roth 401k. You have to make assumptions about future taxes, but in most situations, the value to your portfolio is about the same. You will still owe on your house a few more years but you have the cash on hand to pay it off early.

The advantage to investing is liquidity. The Roth and the 401k can be pulled out and used for any purpose. To realize the equity in your house, you have to sell it or borrow against it. Added to that is the fact that I keep my small tax deduction for a few more years, so in the end, a safe investment in a tax-smart fund versus putting it into equity really gives a financial advantage toward investing as long as the loan is in place, certainly while the interest payments are deductable.

So given the chance to invest in paying off a 5% mortgage with after tax dollars or investing at 5% with pre-tax dollars (while deducting the mortgage interest), the answer isn't always obvious. In my case, investing works somewhat better, and I can pay the house off today if I need to. Plus I can create cash to use for something else if I need to without going into debt.

Not saying your approach is wrong, because it probably isn't for you. But this approach is better for me. When you have cash on hand to cover it, debt isn't always bad.

19 posted on 02/16/2008 3:54:52 AM PST by TN4Liberty (Sadly, the grown-ups don't run the GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ASOC
I look at it as the house is now paying me $1K a month in rent avoidance

There are people paying that much or more in real estate taxes. We were paying that much in the 1980's! We moved to a rural area in another state and started paying peanuts. Currently about $30 a month goes to taxes, on a house larger than 3000 sf.

20 posted on 02/16/2008 3:57:14 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( Peel back tabs for tagline. Do not remove this label. Obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson