Skip to comments.
Unofficial election tally might have overstated Clinton victory (In 80 districts Obama had 0)
AP/Newsday ^
| Feb. 16, 2008
| Staff
Posted on 02/16/2008 7:37:47 PM PST by jdm
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Unofficial voting results are reported by election officials to police officers, then released to the media.LOL.
1
posted on
02/16/2008 7:37:52 PM PST
by
jdm
To: jdm
"It was unclear why the errors had taken place." Yep - a real mystery. I'm shocked!
2
posted on
02/16/2008 7:41:20 PM PST
by
Enterprise
((Those who "betray us" also "Betray U.S." They're called DEMOCRATS!))
To: jdm
Thanks to whoever is adding these helpful keywords, such as “ny2008,” to the posts. I’m guessing it’s the moderator, but whoever it is, thanks a lot, since keywords aren’t always my strength. :O)
3
posted on
02/16/2008 7:42:35 PM PST
by
jdm
(You must have cookies enabled to log-in.)
To: Enterprise
Sounds like the Clinton Machine is getting cranked up.
4
posted on
02/16/2008 7:43:29 PM PST
by
quikdrw
(Life is tough....it's even tougher if you are stupid.)
To: jdm
I bet she managed to get all of the Super Delegates the same way...
5
posted on
02/16/2008 7:43:42 PM PST
by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: jdm
When “Primary Colors II” comes out, we’ll find out who the clumsy operative was who was too cute by half when tampering with the vote tally. Paging Craig Livingstone, or was this Maggie “The Fixer” Williams’ first assignment since getting back into the Clinton RICO Crime Family?
6
posted on
02/16/2008 7:43:50 PM PST
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
To: jdm
Is New York a winner take all state?
7
posted on
02/16/2008 7:45:43 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: quikdrw
"Sounds like the Clinton Machine is getting cranked up." Crank, crack, smack. Whatever they can get their hands on.
8
posted on
02/16/2008 7:46:48 PM PST
by
Enterprise
((Those who "betray us" also "Betray U.S." They're called DEMOCRATS!))
To: jdm
There’s a future for those folks here in King Co. WA.
9
posted on
02/16/2008 7:47:45 PM PST
by
VR-21
To: MHGinTN
Is New York a winner take all state?No.
(not for Democrats).
10
posted on
02/16/2008 7:51:55 PM PST
by
jdm
(You must have cookies enabled to log-in.)
To: jdm
I’m shocked. Surely they aren’t suggesting something nefarious is going on? *giggle*
11
posted on
02/16/2008 7:52:13 PM PST
by
processing please hold
( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
To: jdm
Somewhere Richard J. Dailey is smiling!
12
posted on
02/16/2008 7:52:35 PM PST
by
Froggie
To: jdm
Oh my! Such blatant rigging is unlike the Rodham-rodent’s henchghouls. Usually they can make it look like an innocent error if discovered. I can’t wait to see what the excuse will be when the super delegates appoint her lowness as the nominee over Barry the great.
13
posted on
02/16/2008 7:57:13 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: jdm
Marcus Cederqvist, the executive director of the city's Board of Elections, told The New York Times that human error in reading off the columns of election returns was probably to blame.
Ya think?
14
posted on
02/16/2008 7:58:19 PM PST
by
callisto
(CONGRESS.SYS corrupted...Re-boot Washington DC (Y/N)?)
To: jdm
Damn I love it when the rats screw each other over, following their own time-honored traditions.
15
posted on
02/16/2008 7:59:04 PM PST
by
RJS1950
(The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
To: jdm
80 districts and not a single vote for Obama? Not even a hanging Chad? I guess Hillary’s are well hung.
To: jdm
all you gotta do is have the union guys volunteer for the polls and ya can control it the way ya want it! how da ya think JFK won Chicago back in the old days....union hacks...if you can’t steal the votes...don’t count em...
17
posted on
02/16/2008 8:02:19 PM PST
by
Chuck N
To: jdm
On election night, 80 election districts in New York City initially reported that they had not recorded a single vote for ObamaThat's nothing.
Saddam got 100% of the vote the last time he ran for President of Iraq.
Hell, they guy running against him didn't even vote for himself!
18
posted on
02/16/2008 8:02:36 PM PST
by
HIDEK6
To: haroldeveryman
Hillary, you got to love her. Not a single vote for Obama in Harlem. That will make the ghost of Big Al Capone Proud. Coruption on this scale hasn’t been seen since JFK too Chacago.
To: Forward the Light Brigade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson