shower with this after you vote for Hillary
Posted on 03/04/2008 8:08:12 AM PST by reaganator
I'm a Conservative then a Republican. I believe the liberal socialist Democrats must be completely politically defeated.
The GOP nominee is unquestionably going to be John McCain.
I have not voted yet today. I think we want the Democratic contest to continue so I'll go to my polling place and say, "Democrat" and vote for Mrs. Bill Clinton. Whar are the thoughts on this?
Excuse me while I stray just a bit. Mrs. Clinton's husband, while a sitting President committed numerous felonies in attempt to fix a court case in which an American citizen was the plaintiff and he himself, President Bill Clinton was the defendant.
Heard that any where during this campaign?
Remember Al Gore's campaign slogan? "The people against the powerful" I thought this was very ironic since it applied to Paula Jones against Bill Clinton.
So to with the Hillary! campaign.
Vote for Barack, he’ll be easier to defeat in Nov.
Stock up on Gun, Ammo, and Food.
Take her out now!!!!! We will deal with the other one later.
Take a pencil and write the words “PRESIDENT HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON” on a piece of paper. Just before you go into the voting booth, look at that piece of paper. Do you really want to risk it?
We just have to make sure somebody takes off the ruby slippers, right away!
Go ahead ... give the impeached former President and his wife another breath in their quest for a return to the White House. Sheesh.
The ONLY way Hillary won’t be President Hillary is if she loses the Dem nomination. VOTE FOR OBAMA.
It should be apparent by now that these social policies and the passions that drive them contradict all that is rational in human relating, and they are therefore irrational in themselves. But the faulty conceptions that lie behind these passions cannot be viewed as mere cognitive slippage. The degree of modern liberalism’s irrationality far exceeds any misunderstanding that can be attributed to faulty fact gathering or logical error. Indeed, under careful scrutiny, liberalism’s distortions of the normal ability to reason can only be understood as the product of psychopathology. So extravagant are the patterns of thinking, emoting, behaving and relating that characterize the liberal mind that its relentless protests and demands become understandable only as disorders of the psyche. The modern liberal mind, its distorted perceptions and its destructive agenda are the product of disturbed personalities.
As is the case in all personality disturbance, defects of this type represent serious failures in development processes. The nature of these failures is detailed below. Among their consequences are the liberal mind’s relentless efforts to misrepresent human nature and to deny certain indispensable requirements for human relating. In his efforts to construct a grand collectivist utopia—to live what Jacques Barzun has called “the unconditioned life” in which “everybody should be safe and at ease in a hundred ways”—the radical liberal attempts to actualize in the real world an idealized fiction that will mitigate all hardship and heal all wounds. (Barzun 2000). He acts out this fiction, essentially a Marxist morality play, in various theaters of human relatedness, most often on the world’s economic, social and political stages. But the play repeatedly folds. Over the course of the Twentieth Century, the radical liberal’s attempts to create a brave new socialist world have invariably failed. At the dawn of the Twenty-first Century his attempts continue to fail in the stagnant economies, moral decay and social turmoil now widespread in Europe. An increasingly bankrupt welfare society is putting the U.S. on track for the same fate if liberalism is not cured there. Because the liberal agenda’s principles violate the rules of ordered liberty, his most determined efforts to realize its visionary fantasies must inevitably fall short. Yet, despite all the evidence against it, the modern liberal mind believes his agenda is good social science. It is, in fact, bad science fiction. He persists in this agenda despite its madness.
Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr, MD
shower with this after you vote for Hillary
My thoughts on this are that you’re about 4 hours behind me. I voted for the beast this morning.
If hillary is the nom, then she will be forced to pick Obama as the VP, which means we get both, if Obama wins the nom, I doubt he will pick the beast.
>When you come upon a wounded wolf in the forest, you do not take it home and nurse it back to health, you KILL it.
Yeah. What HE said.
& this one is more than a wolf, she’s a WEREwolf. Very dangerous, very difficult to kill. Satanic. Supernatural.
Use that silver bullet vote to kill it dead. (politically speaking, of course.) Vote AGAINST hillary in the primary.
>> Take a pencil and write the words “PRESIDENT HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON” on a piece of paper. Just before you go into the voting booth, look at that piece of paper. Do you really want to risk it?
That’s powerful! & a little scary i might add
I will be voting for Ron Paul this afternoon in Ohio.
I’m kinda leaning towards “stake through the heart.”
You can always keep some smallpox in your refridgerator in case it might be worth something some day, or you can incinerate it and protect the world.
Ask yourself this: “What would Hillary want you to do?”
There are LOTS of good arguments both ways here: Should I vote for Hillary?
This hasn't happened yet, but if it does it's just another jab in our eye by by RINO McCain.
Here's a story about RINO McCAIN considering a fudgepacker for VP
“and vote for Mrs. Bill Clinton. Whar are the thoughts on this?”
I believe political scientist V.O. Key put it best:
“I’d gnaw my arm off before voting for Hillary.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.