Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One Outrageously Cheap Stock
Motley Fool ^ | March 5, 2008 | Tim Hanson

Posted on 03/09/2008 6:01:33 PM PDT by BenLurkin

You know that political bumper sticker that reads, "If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention"? It might as well apply to the market these days. Starting in November, stocks started dropping ... and they haven't recovered.

Good -- even great -- companies are being sold down to levels far below their true worth, and investors are losing their savings. It's outrageous!

A shocking and somewhat interesting statistic A whopping 79% of all stocks traded in the U.S. are down over the past four months. That's 5,339 names in the red. Another 3,032 of those names (fully 45%) are down 15% or more. And stocks such as Intel (Nasdaq: INTC), Verizon (NYSE: VZ), DISH Network (Nasdaq: DISH), and even Wrigley (NYSE: WWY) haven't returned a penny for the past three years.

So if you've lost money of late, don't feel bad. There has been no hiding from this downturn.

But let's also be honest: It hurts.

Time to panic sell It's outrageous and it hurts, but what's the individual investor to do? The market is a monolith at times, and it can be hard to sway.

Case in point: Barrett Business Services. I found this tiny West Coast professional employer organization and staffing company during my work as the micro-cap analyst for our Motley Fool Hidden Gems service. At the time, it was trading for a little more than $20 per share. I liked the CEO, I liked the balance sheet, I liked the track record, and I thought it looked cheap.

What's happened since? You guessed right: It's dropped about 25%.

What's your next move? See, the market has it in its head that the economy is worsening and the consumer is weakening. When fears are that broad, everybody gets punished.

Pain isn't reserved for companies that struggle to turn a profit, such as Wind River Systems (Nasdaq: WIND). Companies such as Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) that have seen their business fundamentally altered by the credit crunch are also hurting. The market has even stung "defensive" plays like Clorox (NYSE: CLX).

And while losing money can feel outrageous, the most outrageous part about all of this is that even great companies are getting caught up in the chaos. Some of this makes sense (the economy is getting worse, after all), but some of it does not (it won't be terrible forever).

But back to Barrett: It still has a strong balance sheet, it's buying back shares and buying up weakened competitors on the cheap, and it's paying shareholders a nice 2% dividend. Could the stock drop further from here? Of course, but I still think it's outrageously cheap.

And I'm not alone. CEO Bill Sherertz told analysts on the last conference call: "If you guys want to sell [the company] down to five times earnings, maybe I will just buy the whole [expletive] thing."

Enough [expletive] said After backing out cash on the balance sheet, Barrett today sells for just 7.0 times earnings. But that's not necessarily the point. It's suffering along with a few thousand more stocks on the market.

Investors, then, have two ways to express their outrage:

Withdraw money from the market and wait for current market conditions to subside. Put more money in the market and take advantage of current prices to build a portfolio of excellent companies on the cheap. We're all about the latter strategy at Hidden Gems, and we're excited because there are so many more buying opportunities today than there were last summer, when our returns were flying high. Fortunately, investing isn't about short-term returns; it's about making a fortune over the next decade or more.

While market conditions like those we have now can be painful, they're can also help you amass a fortune. So swallow hard, and start buying


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: Afronaut

Never chase a stock (either up or down) — excellent advice!

One can never call either the bottom or the top but it IS possible to buy low (by buying into this kind of market) and sell high for those with investing time frames of five more more years or so.


21 posted on 03/09/2008 6:38:59 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut

Won’t take 5-10 years. S&P is trading at about 11-12x 2009 earnings estimates (15x this year’s earnings). At that point, it’s grossly undervalued compared to the last 50 years. Even the dotcom bubble didn’t take 5-10 years to turn around.


22 posted on 03/09/2008 6:39:08 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: spectre

I own a few hundred shares of C at ~28 ... But I’m not margined so I will just sell covered calls on it and wait it out


23 posted on 03/09/2008 6:40:06 PM PDT by clamper1797 (Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jdm

BUY! BUY! That’s Double Mint gum, not Triple Mint.


24 posted on 03/09/2008 6:41:56 PM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut

>> Never chase a downward market.

I can show you the scars on my hands where I tried to catch the falling knives in ‘00 - ‘01.

I’ve learned my lesson.

Ain’t nowhere near the blood in the streets that there will be, soon.

Real estate, too.

It’s a good time to be in cash. I hope the goofballs at the fed don’t inflate it all away.


25 posted on 03/09/2008 6:44:55 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (I'm not voting FOR John McCain -- I'm voting AGAINST Hillary/Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
I hope the goofballs at the fed don’t inflate it all away.

Ditto that!

26 posted on 03/09/2008 6:46:53 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
Would you still wait it out if you had over 1400 shares?

sw

27 posted on 03/09/2008 6:47:37 PM PDT by spectre (spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: spectre

Depends on what I paid for it ...


28 posted on 03/09/2008 6:50:55 PM PDT by clamper1797 (Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: spectre

Then you will have the problem of reinvesting. I used to think Money Markets were safe but they can break the buck.


29 posted on 03/09/2008 6:53:10 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Get every dollar of possible liquidity out of the stock market; out of banking institutions; out of mutual funds; put it all in short term T-Bills—through Treasury Direct if possible; if not in a fund such as American Century Investment’s Capital Preservation Fund.

Start tomorrow morning at 7:00 CST by calling American Century to open an account.


30 posted on 03/09/2008 6:55:04 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Carlyle Capital hit the wall last Thursday. As one of the biggest players Carlyle was investing because they could make a good deal of money between what debt instruments were paying and the cost of borrowed funds.

Not to be outdone by anyone else they borrowed big time such that their leverage was 1:32. Yup, that is right! When these mortgages began to lose more than 3% of their principal, Carlyle had to sell and sell big.

No doubt, there are many other large players that have been caught using massive borrowings to make their money; however, these borrowings become cash starved alligators when things don’t work out.

I note, that solvent corporate borrowers can still borrow. After all, Gates plans to borrow half of 40 billion to buy Yahoo. Interest rates are still low and many fine companies continue to make money.

I probably am stupid, but I am betting we are close to a sharp decline and then a massive thrust to the upside. Big profitable companies should make money for themselves and their investors.


31 posted on 03/09/2008 6:55:13 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
BUY! BUY! That’s Double Mint gum, not Triple Mint.

My CTRL + V got stuck. Sorry. :)

32 posted on 03/09/2008 6:55:43 PM PDT by jdm (Contrary to popular belief, the search function works just fine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: boop

The spread from T-Bills to CD’s is not enough to justify the additional risk in the CD’s.


33 posted on 03/09/2008 6:56:42 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rb22982
I believe 100% that what is about to be revealed in this economy will be historic and make the .com burst look like a small blip.

One point, (I have many)

When has the US Federal Government sends checks to the population to have a short term spending increased? Which won't be a spending increase but end up back into the financial sector. (Credit, loans, etc. It is a bailout. Think about the facts for a minute. Washington gives out money to families, they pay bills, where is most of this money going to end up?

That is a sign of how bad this really is. You can dismiss all that I have posted. And you will forget that you read it. But I do not think this is a time to hold onto equities, Keep the historical pricing, it won't help you make a dime. If were only that easy.

34 posted on 03/09/2008 6:57:24 PM PDT by Afronaut (It's 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
Well, it isn't the profit I'm concerned with here. We're staying in the market, and have never panicked..

For me, it's losing every dime if Citi goes under. The FDIC won't reimburse their investors.

I'm waiting for someone to tell me Citigroup won't collapse..that I'm being foolish thinking this.

sw

35 posted on 03/09/2008 7:01:32 PM PDT by spectre (spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: David

Hmmmmm.

Sounds interesting.

You are convinced this is a sound org and strategy because???

Thanks much for your kind reply.


36 posted on 03/09/2008 7:01:55 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert; Quix
It isn't the small investor bailing out, it is the big guys looking for cash to cover margin on bad bets.

My stocks are like that. They just posted very good earnings, are not subject to any of the current credit turmoil, yet have been going down with the rest of the market in Jan and now. It isn't anything to do with them, it is probably only the general market sentiment and margin call covering.

Now is always the time to buy, if you know what you are doing. If you don't know exactly what to do now, just have some money ready and study. I follow about 30-40 stocks. I study a few of those seriously. Of those I invest in about 2-5 of them, and when my money is invested I follow them very closely. I know their histories, and I know pretty well where they are going. If you know the companies, you know what is a problem, and what is an opportunity caused by the derteriorating market.

Also, I have not invested, but I am starting to get more interested in bonds. Those wild interest rates are good if I can lock some of those in.

37 posted on 03/09/2008 7:01:57 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rb22982
"Won’t take 5-10 years. S&P is trading at about 11-12x 2009 earnings estimates (15x this year’s earnings). At that point, it’s grossly undervalued compared to the last 50 years."

No. Not so.

If you believe that, pick an S & P company; order up the current SEC financial filing; get a copy of the current financial report; take a pencil and paper and restate the earnings to GAAP--take amounts reported as gross income that have not been earned out of income; take below the line items that are not treated as expenses above the line as costs of earning the current income; restate compensation expense to reality by treating equity compensation as compensation; by treating true retirement plan costs as current expenses; by treating long term health care costs accruing in the current period as expenses. Read all the footnotes and restate the reported earnings to reality by historical GAAP.

You will find in most cases that the earnings have disappeared--that true P/E ratios are still above 50.

38 posted on 03/09/2008 7:03:26 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Sounds wise.

Thanks much for your kind reply.


39 posted on 03/09/2008 7:03:34 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut

The dotcom was far worse. Dow/S&P stocks were 2-3x overvalued based on historical averages and the Nasdaq was nearly 10x overvalued. I see all 3 indexes significantly higher at the end of 2009. If it does drop from now till then, I’ll just keep plowing money in. Don’t buy this hysteria. Over 1000 S&L went belly up in the S&L crises. We’ve only had 2 small ones this year and a handful last year. The world is not coming to an end. I expect the bad news to end by November at the latest.


40 posted on 03/09/2008 7:06:31 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson