Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain lashes Democrats for "NAFTA-bashing"
Reuters on Yahoo ^ | 3/11/08 | Steve Holland

Posted on 03/11/2008 9:33:27 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: Bishop_Malachi

Put on your flame-retardant suit. In this bizzarro world, protectionism and mercantilism are somehow considered economic conservatism, and allowing the personality cult of Barak O’Carter gain the presidency is somehow considered standing up for conservative priciples.


21 posted on 03/11/2008 10:04:59 AM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: catbertz
Trade tariffs end, marking a NAFTA milestone.

No one has sufficiently explained the unfairness of it all.

22 posted on 03/11/2008 10:06:00 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pissant

if you don’t want to buy from china, don’t buy from china.

Just don’t tell other americans what to do with their own money and let’s get rid of the nanny state that tries to protect companies that can’t compete.


23 posted on 03/11/2008 10:06:25 AM PDT by ari-freedom (McCain must pick a conservative VP if he wants conservative support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Exactly right!


24 posted on 03/11/2008 10:07:39 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (Changing things in Washington is not unlike changing a baby’s diaper. It gets dirty again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

The US should eliminate all trade barriers unilaterally. It should set an example for freedom.


25 posted on 03/11/2008 10:08:07 AM PDT by ari-freedom (McCain must pick a conservative VP if he wants conservative support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sanchmo

and they think raising taxes somehow creates jobs


26 posted on 03/11/2008 10:09:36 AM PDT by ari-freedom (McCain must pick a conservative VP if he wants conservative support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

That would work on the blackboard, but you’d have a serious free-rider problem.


27 posted on 03/11/2008 10:10:21 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Your understanding of what China is doing via “free trade” is woeful.

What % of US intellectual property (software, music, firmware, designs, etc) does china actually pay for?

What taxes are put onto US products when they arrive on China’s shore? How about when Chinese products come here?

What punishment has China received for using US high tech products for their military applications, against the trade agreements and US law?

What is an offset? Why does China require them?

If you don’t know what I’m talking about, you don’t have any idea that our free trade is actually very poorly managed “managed trade”.


28 posted on 03/11/2008 10:13:19 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
McCain is the worst and I won't vote for that Marxist either.

But I'm for free trade. If it weren't for NAFTA then Mexicans would have even less jobs and more Mexicans would move to the U.S.A. which McCain wants but I don't want.

American companies can't compete with those in other countries like China because liberals/Democrats/socialist have imposed so many environmental laws, OSHA, workmen's comp laws, Affirmative action, minimum wage laws , laws that allow unions and personal injury lawyers to sue,other laws and regulations and taxes that cripple U.S. businesses of all types but mainly manufacturing.

29 posted on 03/11/2008 10:14:17 AM PDT by Democrat_media (Socialism will destroy a country economically. why dems & Mccain for Socialism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant
You mean "trade," and not "free trade." We don't have a free trade agreement with China.

It seems like I'm splitting hairs, but it's nearly impossible to have a serious discussion about "free trade" (just as it is to have a serious discussion about "fair trade") if everyone makes up their definitions on the fly.

30 posted on 03/11/2008 10:18:05 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: 1rudeboy

I’m for most trade deals but we have to get rid of this idea that trade barriers help us and that we’re only giving a favor when we eliminate them. Americans benefit from lower prices and more choices.


32 posted on 03/11/2008 10:25:13 AM PDT by ari-freedom (McCain must pick a conservative VP if he wants conservative support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
"He seems to have some bizarre form of Tourettes syndrome that causes him to insult everyone around him."

YES!!

33 posted on 03/11/2008 10:28:04 AM PDT by isrul (Help make koranimals an endangered species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

In the early-90s, when Nafta was being promoted, I had a hard time deciding whether I agreed with it or not. The good versus the bad was difficult to gauge. The argument that eventually won me over was that it was supposed to help boost certain quarters of the Mexican economy, leading to a substantial decrease in illegal immigration! Being burned (severely) on that single point, I really don’t have any inclination to find myself ever defending the darned accord, even if some of the economic data might indeed prove positive.


34 posted on 03/11/2008 10:29:36 AM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greene66
Yet certain quarters of of the Mexican economy (as well as the economy as a whole) were boosted. So while some incentives to illegally emigrate were reduced, others were not. It's not that complicated.

You need to ask yourself: if we backed out of NAFTA tomorrow, would illegal immigration slow to a trickle or even stop? Don't kid yourself.

35 posted on 03/11/2008 10:32:51 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

That’s why China in Walmart is unionized.....buy the communist party. That’s why Google and Yahoo has had to assist China in stamping out free speech on their internet. That’s why the PLA is embedded in so many of the high tech US-China partnerships. That’s why products by Chinese companies pop up all the time using stolen, bribed for, or reversed engineered patented technology and designs? That’s why they have the most aggressive corporate espionage system in the world?

You read about those successes in starbucks and Cat in selling to the chicoms, yet why don’t you mention that the trade deficit with China this past year grew another 11% to an all time high near $300 BILLION. Profits that are not just in the pockets of chinese businessmen, but the communist government, who is purhcasing, stealing and bribing for the most sophisticated military technologies on the planet.


36 posted on 03/11/2008 10:33:17 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant

If there’s anything we’ve learned, anything McCain is touting must be deeply flawed.
(Btw, try on any Target `Cherokee’ khakis before buying, unless you like that `skin-tight’ look; they’re now made in Vietnam, People’s Republic of, and I believe they used a starving Somali girl as their typical buyer.)


37 posted on 03/11/2008 10:35:09 AM PDT by tumblindice (`Juan' McCain: mean as a cut bull snake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"The moral of the story is, my friends, is we're not going back to the old manufacturing base of the economy," he(McCain) said.

U.S.A. Manufacturing D.O.A.

38 posted on 03/11/2008 10:38:55 AM PDT by gitmogrunt (Now ,I can put on my Gas Mask and Rose Colored Glasses and vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
There are many U.S. companies with factories and stores in China right now, including Wal-Mart, Starbucks McCdonalds, Ford,GM, Caterpillar etc.

It's just another location for these companies.

Yes the Chinese GOVERNMENT is doing a lot of bad things but so is the U.S. Government. What many are doing by cutting down trade with China is punishing private Chinese and American companies that operate in China that are providing many products we need.

You should draw a distinction between the Chinese government and private companies. There are some private companies in China that produce high quality, safe products at a low price and still follow all U.S. laws.

39 posted on 03/11/2008 10:40:30 AM PDT by Democrat_media (Socialism will destroy a country economically. why dems & Mccain for Socialism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
Whether America manufactures everything should be determined based on comparative advantage (the difference in opportunity costs of producing on product vs another) and not on the various arguments about "lost manufacturing jobs".

There you go again, the same old "comparative advantage" mantra. Perhaps you don't know, but when the classical liberals (Smith, Hume, Ricardo) promulgated their free trade theories, they prophesied that trade would be kept in balance by the exchange of gold.

Today, there is no gold standard or exchange. When a nation racks up a huge trade deficit year after year, eventually that country's currency will collapse. We're seeing the beginning of the collapse of the U.S. dollar.

40 posted on 03/11/2008 10:40:50 AM PDT by trane250
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson