Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/15/2008 8:47:51 AM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: doug from upland

Yes, I always found it amusing that Hillary failed the DC Bar exam. She passed the Bar exam in Arkansas, btw. Apparently the exam in Arkansas was/is a heck of a lot easier. What a surprise./s


2 posted on 03/15/2008 8:53:35 AM PDT by khnyny (Hillary is the national equivalent of Tracy Flick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

I was livid when my local rag used CREW as a source in an article a few months back.


3 posted on 03/15/2008 8:56:17 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
In the end, the impression that both books leave is that Mrs. Clinton has had two crowning achievements in her career. One was in 1992, when she fought off allegations about her husband’s womanizing and helped him win the presidency. The other was in 1998, when she fought off allegations about her husband’s womanizing and helped him stay in office. The rest? It’s a mixed bag at best.

and she managed to convince Americans Bill was not a womanizer?

4 posted on 03/15/2008 8:58:03 AM PDT by woofie (Impeach whoever is the next President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

Perhaps, being as how she REALLY was not named after Sir Edmund Hillary, for historical purposes she should be named STONEWALL CLINTON. It fits.


5 posted on 03/15/2008 8:59:29 AM PDT by Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
The sum total of Shrillary's dubious 'achievements' in public life:

"the impression that both books leave is that Mrs. Clinton has had two crowning achievements in her career. One was in 1992, when she fought off allegations about her husband’s womanizing and helped him win the presidency. The other was in 1998, when she fought off allegations about her husband’s womanizing and helped him stay in office"
7 posted on 03/15/2008 8:59:38 AM PDT by Enchante (ex-Governor Spitzer, can you recommend a "high class" prostitute for a Dem. friend?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

Bump


8 posted on 03/15/2008 9:00:45 AM PDT by nuconvert (There are bad people in the pistachio business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

Bump.


9 posted on 03/15/2008 9:04:01 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

From the NewsMax.com Staff
For the story behind the story...

Monday, Nov. 17, 2003 12:03 a.m. EST
Mary Matalin: The Other Pellicano Tapes

With Los Angeles private eye Anthony Pellicano beginning his jail sentence on Monday, Hollywood is on pins and needles wondering about the Pellicano tapes, illegal wiretap transcripts discovered on the celebrity gumshoe’s computer while he was under investigation for a witness intimidation rap.

But those aren’t the only recordings that document the work of the man known as the “investigator to the stars.”

In 1992, when “the Pelican” hired on to do damage control for Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign, Mary Matalin, then the political director for President Bush 41’s re-election campaign, found herself in the unenviable position of being sought out by women who were linked to Clinton - and threatened into silence by Mr. Pellicano.

Matalin, now a senior White House adviser, discussed the episode in 1997 during a stint as a talk radio host on CBS’s Washington, D.C., affiliate.

“I got the letters from Pellicano to these women intimidating them,” Matalin told her audience. “I had tapes of conversations from Pellicano to the women. I got handwritten letters from the women.”

As recounted in “Hillary’s Scheme,” by NewsMax.com’s Carl Limbacher, the Bush insider continued:

“I got one letter from one of the women’s dad’s saying, ‘This is so horrible. Here’s what they’re going to do to us,’ you know, essentially. It’s not like they said, ‘We’re going to go out there and bust your kneecaps. (It was more like) we’re going to say this, that and the other.’”

Matalin said she first noticed something was amiss when the Clinton campaign announced publicly that there were 19 women who would likely claim some sort of relationship with the Democratic candidate.

“I controlled the money in the [1992 Bush] campaign,” Matalin explained. “And [Clinton damage controller] Betsy Wright announced that she was putting $28,000 on the ‘bimbo’ patrol and on Jack Palladino and Pellicano, the other guy.

“And $28,000 to me, the political director, was four states in the Rocky Mountains. You had a limited budget. I said, how could they spend this much money? How could they basically give up four states to track down ‘bimbos’?

“That’s why it was kind of shocking to me that it must have been a bigger priority than putting money into states for the purpose of winning and that’s why I flagged it at the time. I don’t even remember how many or what kind of women.”

However, even though Pellicano’s tapes and letters offered smoking-gun proof of the Clinton campaign’s heavy-handed attempts to silence the future president’s ex-girlfriends, then-President Bush refused to use the damaging info to save his re-election bid.

Matalin explained: “When I went to my boss in the campaign with this information and then they went to Bush, Bush himself called me up and said, ‘I don’t want to hear it. Don’t even tell me what you have. Throw it all out,’” she told her radio audience.

Luckily for Mr. Pellicano - not to mention Bill and Hillary Clinton - Mary Matalin did as she was told.


10 posted on 03/15/2008 9:04:39 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
“Bill’s supporters monitored frequencies used by cell phones,” Gerth and Van Natta add, “and the tape was made during one of those monitoring sessions.” Who knew that Mrs. Clinton was an early advocate of warrantless wiretapping?

Wow! What a bombshell! That clearly explains the Florida couple John and Alice Martin who were just "driving around with a scanner and a tape recorder" and just "happened to hear Newt Gingrich" and recorded it for their grandchild because it was histroy.

ALICE MARTIN: We're going to have a grandson at the end of January, and we were thinking how neat it would be to play this tape for him and him hear the voices of people that we thought were important. That's really all it was going to be is a little tape we put aside and when he was old enough to hear it, he could hear it.

11 posted on 03/15/2008 9:11:00 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

The Clintons are truly evil.


13 posted on 03/15/2008 9:19:29 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

Well, I hope Obama can take advantage of some of this.


14 posted on 03/15/2008 9:19:35 AM PDT by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than any of us will ever fully realize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

It doesn’t matter. Thanks to Rush Limbaugh she will probably be our next president. God help us all.


15 posted on 03/15/2008 9:22:02 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
Image hosted by Photobucket.com Image hosted by Photobucket.com
16 posted on 03/15/2008 9:26:25 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
Though bereft of headline-making disclosures, each book contains page after page of new details, some of them so far ignored in the press, that reveal Hillary Rodham Clinton to be even more secretive, even more politically tin-eared, and even more combative than previously known.

We've always known here on FR that Hillary was much more dangerously prone to this beyond unleashing a few ashtrays.

18 posted on 03/15/2008 9:35:52 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland


19 posted on 03/15/2008 9:37:10 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
In a scene from the frenzied Clinton transition after the 1992 election, Bernstein portrays Mrs. Clinton sitting down with top political adviser Dick Morris, musing over what position to take in the new administration. Hillary thought she might make a fine attorney general — until someone remembered the “Bobby Kennedy law” that forbade a president from making nepotism appointments to his cabinet. She thought about becoming White House chief of staff — Bernstein reports that Morris “was one of several people with whom Hillary discussed the question of being chief of staff.” Or perhaps she might be the chief domestic-policy adviser.
Anybody who knows their Seinfeld will recognize in this wacky Hillary/Dick Morris scene the echoes of a famous scene from Seinfeld Episode 12: The Revenge. After getting angry and quitting his real estate sales job, George, sitting on the floor in Jerry's apartment, discusses with Jerry some ideas for jobs he might like to have:
GEORGE:  I like sports. I could do something in sports.
JERRY:  Uh-huh. Uh-huh. In what capacity?
GEORGE:  You know, like the general manager of a baseball team or something.
JERRY:  Yeah. Well, that - that could be tough to get.
GEORGE:  Well, it doesn't even have to be the general manager. Maybe I could be like, an announcer. Like a color man. You know how I always make those interesting comments during the game.
JERRY:  Yeah. Yeah. You make good comments.
GEORGE:  What about that?
JERRY:  Well, they tend to give those jobs to ex-ballplayers and people that are, you know, in broadcasting.
GEORGE:  Well, that's really not fair.
JERRY:  I know. Well, okay. Okay. What else do ya like?
GEORGE:  Movies. I like to watch movies.
JERRY:  Yeah. Yeah.
GEORGE:  Do they pay people to watch movies?
JERRY:  Projectionists.
GEORGE:  That's true.
JERRY:  But you gotta know how to work the projector.
GEORGE:  Right.
JERRY:  And it's probably a union thing.
GEORGE:  (scoffs) Those unions. (sighs) Okay. Sports,...movies. What about a talk show host?
JERRY:  Talk show host. That's good.
GEORGE:  I think I'd be good at that. I talk to people all the time. Someone even told me once they thought I'd be a good talk show host.
JERRY:  Really?
GEORGE:  Yeah. A couple of people. I don't get that, though. Where do you start?
JERRY:  Well, that's where it gets tricky.
GEORGE:  You can't just walk into a building and say " I wanna be a talk show host."
JERRY:  I wouldn't think so.
GEORGE:  It's all politics.
Hillary Rodham Clinton: the George Costanza of American politics.
20 posted on 03/15/2008 9:37:30 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
Bernstein goes much deeper than Gerth and Van Natta, portraying a Hillary Clinton who was even more closely involved in the running of her husband’s administration than we thought.

So THIS is why she keeps claiming on the campaign trail that she's got experience. Well she does - but dare she document out loud and in public just how much experience and how deep it goes?

Giving us pause for the concept of yet another Co-Clinton-Presidency.

22 posted on 03/15/2008 9:38:18 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
Gerth and Van Natta also show Clinton employing secret staffers, in the process sneaking around Senate rules that don’t suit her fancy. They show her threatening a staffer with “You’ll never work in Democratic politics again” if the staffer failed to cover up tax returns showing Clinton’s commodities-trading profits. And they show her directing the operation to stonewall the independent-counsel investigations of her husband.

Bernstein’s book doesn’t dwell on that kind of detail. But with a lot of prime sources in the Clinton camp, Bernstein goes much deeper than Gerth and Van Natta, portraying a Hillary Clinton who was even more closely involved in the running of her husband’s administration than we thought. And not only more closely involved — she was also even less competent and more politically maladroit than we thought.

She's such a sweetie and the lyrical sound of her voice is enough to...

24 posted on 03/15/2008 9:46:14 AM PDT by EverOnward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

Bumping for a later read, thanks!


30 posted on 03/15/2008 10:18:30 AM PDT by AuntB ('If there must be trouble let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." T. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

It’s really sad (and I’m embarrassed) that I just watched an hour long interview of McCain on Hannity’s America (persevered through it all) and then I came across this article. Hillary will use everything on earth against him and he will never go after her. Or Obama for that matter.
We know what she is, what she isn’t and what she will be, but John McCain is wearing his blinders and he’s really in for it when she becomes the Dumbocrat candidate, she’ll simply wear him down, because being rude and brazen isn’t in his soul.

Great Post Doug!


36 posted on 03/16/2008 10:18:09 PM PDT by Pagey (Horrible Hillary Clinton is Bad For America, Bad For Business and Bad For MY Stomach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson