TOPICS:
There sure isn’t an awful lot to like about the wretch, is there?
Her approval ratings are approaching Bush’s. Not good for her.
Clinton takes hit; but denies inhaling (again).
And Obama leads McCain by 2% in this same poll.
It’s understandable.
Some conservatives hate Clinton so much that refuse to attack Obama. If you look at Drudge’s page right now, you will think yo are in www.barackobama.com
Clinton deserved to be taken out of the race. But shooting a dead body will do us no good. Obama has 99% chances to be McCain’s opponent, therefore we must go after him.
It’s a mistake. It has to be. After all, she’s the smartest woman in the world. In fact, the clintoons are the smartest people in the world. Katie Kolic told us so. remember?
Everyone knows she will steal the nomination come convention time.
I think Al Gore might come in to save the day for the dems, and I doubt he will pick either Hil or ‘Bama as running mates.
Also see here:
NBC-WSJ POLL: NEW CLINTON LOWS (HILLARY BOTTOMING OUT?)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1992268/posts
I hope this can help her. HILLARY IN MILITARY HISTORY - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1992274/posts
What they don’t mention here, but is mentioned in the original release but not in Russert’s typical stupifyingly biased analysis, is that they purposefully oversampled black voters to get a more “realistic” view of the impact Obama’s speech had on voters. Yes, because only by asking a disproportionately large sample of completely uninvested voters, like blacks in this election cycle, can we truly find out the overall country’s opinion.
Yes, black voters, who are unbiased (or we are supposed to believe, apparently, since this is “realistic” oversampling) are 50/50 split for Obama and Clinton and are the final arbitors of whether Obama’s speech defending a racist black pastor was good. I had personally thought that Obama had 90% of the black vote wrapped up, and oversampling that group would create an illusory advantage for him and disadvantage for Clinton - but what do I know?
What are we, idiots? They admit they oversampled blacks, purposefully even, but not by what margin. We know this: black voters are angry at Hillary and defend Obama no matter what. So, taking that into account, what are the REAL numbers? Well, not good for Obama certainly.
Obama slipping 2 points, WITH a black oversample, is actually horrendous. How much of an oversample (aka poll rigging) did they need to take to get the result they wanted? “Oh, Obama’s not doing well? Let’s only ask black voters their opinion from here on out! Then he’s *sure* to get somewhat decent approval ratings!”
So, with his approval rating padded, I would guess Clintons approval numbers are about 5% higher than reported here, and Obama’s about 5% lower. And I’ll stick to that figure until they decide to release their methodology and actual percentages (aka never). I should dearly love to see the results EXCLUDING the black vote, since the current results are heavily tipped in that direction.
The cover the media is providing Obama - openly and unapologetically, is astounding. Amazingly, they pulled the SNL skit saying so off youtube within 5 days of it being posted. Who woulda thunk it?
Better headline:
Stalinist hillary solidifies lead as America’s most despised woman.