Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is kind of a different slant on this story. And one wonders.
1 posted on 03/31/2008 9:06:56 AM PDT by stillafreemind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: stillafreemind

Maybe if the greedy bastiges allowed for a bit more bandwidth we could reduce our time on the phone because we could actually understand what was said instead of say “what”, “say that again”, etc.


2 posted on 03/31/2008 9:11:15 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

Not only are they more dangerous to cigarettes, they are tougher to light.


4 posted on 03/31/2008 9:12:16 AM PDT by philled (Tá mé, tá tú, tá sé...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind; Gabz; Eric Blair 2084; 383rr

Ping~


6 posted on 03/31/2008 9:12:35 AM PDT by libertarian27 (Land of the Fee, Home of the Shamed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

The doc has won awards in 14 of the last 16 years. He knows how to play the system politically, IMHO, and he might just do anything to stay in front of a camera. I suspect the whole thing, starting with the grand statements and no backup in the article.


7 posted on 03/31/2008 9:15:43 AM PDT by Thebaddog (Dog breath? I don't think so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

B.S.


8 posted on 03/31/2008 9:16:38 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

Time for the trial lawyers and their Dem friends to start attacking BIG CELL PHONE.


9 posted on 03/31/2008 9:16:41 AM PDT by catpuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

>>Dr. Khurana says there may be broader health ramifications than asbestos or smoking. What? Now just think about that. Again, I foresee a huge higher tax on cell phone use and a higher health and life insurance premium. And maybe people (like me) that don’t use cell phones unless its an emergency, would rather not be seated in bars and restaurants where cell phones are in use. Ah, can you say ban?<<

The danger is in holder the transmitter so close to the head. I can see a requirement for speaker phones or headsets being bundled.

But the risk can’t be as high as this guy says because we’d see much higher death rates with most of the population using cell pones.


10 posted on 03/31/2008 9:19:03 AM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

New tax? No good. But if it turns out that cell phones do cause cancer and insurance companies want to charge higher premiums to those who use them, so be it. Also, no public funding for treatment for people who choose to use them and get sick. (Just like there should be no subsidization for treatment for lung cancer, fatties, etc., etc.)


11 posted on 03/31/2008 9:19:05 AM PDT by mngran2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

I wonder if cordless home phones have any effect?


12 posted on 03/31/2008 9:19:52 AM PDT by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

I’ll tell you what, being subjected to “secondhand conversations” of unlimited inanity really does tend to get my blood pressure up. :) I don’t know what it is about three hundred pound women in supermarkets, but seemingly every one of them is glued to their cell phone.


13 posted on 03/31/2008 9:20:49 AM PDT by AbeKrieger (There is a special place in Hell for Lyndon Johnson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind
Put a cell phone next to your desk top computer and see what happens when it rings.
Whatever that is, no doubt that is what is being pumped into your head when you talk on one. If it's as brutal to tissue as it sounds on your PC's circuitry, it can't be healthy. It sure isn't any kind of "normal" static sound I've ever heard before.
14 posted on 03/31/2008 9:21:49 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

Personally I find it interesting. A former sister in law died of a brain cancer. The only thing that was different in her life style was that she started doing a nighttime newspaper delivery route. While she was doing the route she was on her cell phone at least 50% of the time. Man that woman could talk and talk.....

Pure anecdotal evidence mind you, so I must say that I find this article interesting.

As for myself I prefer to use a headset connected to the cell phone when I have to use one.


20 posted on 03/31/2008 9:28:06 AM PDT by The Working Man (Any work is better than "welfare"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

I almost always use the speaker phone facility.
My kids are into text messaging instead of talking.
I think we’re probably OK.


23 posted on 03/31/2008 9:32:41 AM PDT by devere (http://www.usmm.net/p2/thiswar.jpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

Secondhand cell phone?


24 posted on 03/31/2008 9:33:22 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

I remember rumors that television would cause cancer. Anyone else remember this?


26 posted on 03/31/2008 9:37:56 AM PDT by i_dont_chat (Your choice if you take offense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind; Just another Joe; CSM; lockjaw02; Publius6961; elkfersupper; nopardons; metesky; ...

Nanny State PING....................


29 posted on 03/31/2008 9:39:46 AM PDT by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

From the Dr’s study report linked:

“It draws on growing evidence – exclusively reported in the IoS in October – that using handsets for 10 years or more can double the risk of brain cancer. Cancers take at least a decade to develop, invalidating official safety assurances based on earlier studies which included few, if any, people who had used the phones for that long.”

Notice a similarity here to the AGW scares?

Deniers have to wait until these effects appear (or not) before a new crisis idea can be discarded.

Here, the good doctor sets himself a deadline that will grow or not as the decades advance in the same manner, one would presume, that acceptance and use of mobiles grew.

This concept, too, started with the assumption that inhaling smoke intentionally would harm someone; right now, most lung-cancer victims are in their later years of life and getting sicker with each passing day; most of the older patients were smokers (after all, in the 50s, 50% of the adult population were smokers) during their younger years and slaves to fashion as our young people are today.

We all know that deadly toxins demonstrate immediate harm to the bodily system and slow poisons manifest much later.

At least most people dying of smoking are too sick to have an antenna growing out of their ears.


30 posted on 03/31/2008 9:40:17 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

My brothers business card calls him a “Senior Test engineer”
At work he has a lab that is set up with not only frequency generators but also one of every cell phone, router or anything else he can think of that will generate a signal.That’s so he can make sure that the product his company makes isn’t interfered with by anything else.

He swore to me that he can bring in a hot cup of coffee in the morning leave it untouched all day and it’ll still be hot at the end of eight hours


31 posted on 03/31/2008 9:40:51 AM PDT by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

Any smokers for some popcorn?


36 posted on 03/31/2008 9:45:47 AM PDT by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stillafreemind

Oh great- yet another “curse on society” that we must be rescued from.


38 posted on 03/31/2008 9:49:12 AM PDT by MacDorcha (Arm yourself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson