Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five Myths of Health Care
Pacific Research Institute ^ | 04/04/2008 | Sally Pipes

Posted on 04/04/2008 10:11:17 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake

Five myths of health care


Fictions don't become facts through repetition.

Keep that in mind next time you hear a politician breathlessly decry the horrors of the American health-care system and then explain how he intends to fix it. Some of the most popular talking points in the health-care debate pass as the gospel truth simply because, well, they're popular — not because they're true.

Below, I debunk the five most prominent health-care myths:

(1) Forty-seven million Americans do not have health insurance.

This figure comes from the U.S. Census Bureau. What most people don't know, however, is that the Bureau counts anyone who went without health insurance during any part of the previous year as "uninsured." So if you weren't covered for just one day in 2007, you're one of the 47 million.

That also includes 10.2 million illegal immigrants, and about 14 million people who are eligible for public health-care programs like Medicaid or the State Children's Health Insurance Program but have yet to enroll. And nearly 10 million of the "uninsured" have household incomes of more than $75,000 — so they can probably afford to buy health insurance but choose not to.

(2) Universal health-care coverage can be achieved via "individual mandate."

According to the federal census, nearly two-thirds of the uninsured are aged 18 to 34. This makes sense — healthy people aren't going to pay for expensive insurance they'll never use.

Those who support an "individual mandate" — like Sen. Hillary Clinton and several governors — believe by legally requiring all Americans to buy health insurance the young and the healthy will increase the size of the risk pool and therefore lower premiums for everyone. As a way to enforce an individual mandate, Mrs. Clinton has suggested garnishing wages.

But many states require insurers to charge everyone the same rate. So young people would end up paying far more in premiums than they should — or could — pay. It's patently unfair to force people to purchase insurance they can't afford. Even in Massachusetts, which offers substantial premium subsidies for low-income residents, the government had to exempt a fifth of Bay Staters from the individual mandate because insurance was still so expensive. And, the plan is already $147 million over budget.

The real way to attract young adults into the insurance market is to lower premiums — not to impose draconian sanctions. This can be done by having states reduce costly mandates like coverage of in-vitro fertilization and by allowing people to buy insurance across state lines.

(3) Expensive prescription drugs are a big reason health-care costs increase.

The real price of prescription drugs is actually decreasing. In 2007, inflation rose more than 4 percent, while drug prices increased just 1 percent. So in real terms, drugs were 3 percent cheaper last year than in 2006, on average.

What's more, drug spending is but a small slice of total health-care spending — less than 11 cents out of every health-care dollar goes to prescription meds.

And drugs actually reduce health-care costs in the long-term. Medicare, for instance, saves $2.06 for every additional dollar it spends on pharmaceutical drugs, according to a paper recently published by the National Bureau for Economic Research. Prescription drugs often obviate the need for expensive surgeries and hospital stays.

(4) Drug importation will save patients a fortune.

At most, according to the Congressional Budget Office, foreign drug importation would save Americans 1 percent over the next decade.

Brand-name drugs are cheaper in foreign countries because their governments impose price controls. Drug-makers can only afford to sell pills at cut-rate, controlled prices in Europe and Canada because Americans pay full price.

If American politicians allow foreign drugs to enter the U.S. market, they'll in effect import price controls too. Such action will not only create practical problems, like shortages but also deny firms the return on investment necessary to plunge into the next round of research and development into new cures.

It takes nearly $1 billion to bring a new drug to market. Investors are willing to make such a risky investment because the rewards of developing a cure for Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, AIDS or diabetes are considerable. If the profit motive vanishes, the miracle cures for which America's drug industry is responsible would vanish.

(5) The state-run health-care systems in Canada and Europe are better and cheaper than America's.

People who make this claim usually note that life expectancy is higher in Canada and Europe. But life expectancy is influenced by a number of variables aside from the quality of a country's health-care system — like diet, genetics, exercise, smoking, pollution and even marital status.

A study published last year in the British medical journal the Lancet suggests America is much better at treating cancer than Europe or Canada. Researchers found Americans have a better survival rate for 13 of the 16 most prominent cancers. An American man has nearly a 20 percent better chance of living for five years after being diagnosed with cancer than his European counterpart.

This study's findings tell us a lot more about the quality of a health-care system than life expectancy rates do, because the relationship between treatment and outcomes is tighter, clearer and more direct.




Sally C. Pipes is president and chief executive officer of the Pacific Research Institute and author of "Miracle Cure: How to Solve America's Health-Care Crisis and Why Canada Isn't the Answer."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: healthcare; hillary; hillarycare; nannystate; obama; universalhealthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Probably not the best article to help counter hillarycare, but better than nothing...
1 posted on 04/04/2008 10:11:17 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
Having lived under the British NHS I want all of you to clue in your friends and relatives.

1. A NHS can and does deny care and postpone care. Much worse than our current system.

2. You can't sue the government. No matter what goes wrong in your medical care, no one is held accountable.

3. Be prepared to spend your whole day at the Surgery (local clinic). No appointments just like a walk-in clinic.

4. No cutting edge medicine. You have to accept the limitations of what the Gov’t will reimburse.

National health care sounds good and caring but beware, it has a really dark underbelly.

2 posted on 04/04/2008 10:16:03 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
it has a really dark underbelly.

so do the proponents of it

3 posted on 04/04/2008 10:29:42 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake; All
This post (<-click), from another Hillary Care thread, explains why Hillary Care is constitutionally unauthorized anyway.
4 posted on 04/04/2008 10:32:57 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Great post. Thanks.


5 posted on 04/04/2008 10:34:08 PM PDT by GOPJ (The new Wall Street game: Privatize profits and socialize losses.Freeper Mad_Tom_Rackham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
National health care sounds good and caring but beware, it has a really dark underbelly.

Just another step on the road to the workers' paradise...

6 posted on 04/04/2008 10:38:48 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10
This post (<-click), from another Hillary Care thread, explains why Hillary Care is constitutionally unauthorized anyway.

Being unconstitutional is hardly a speed bump for the nanny staters; it's for our own good doncha know. FWIW, the disease appears to be spreading to some of our very own Pubbies.

7 posted on 04/04/2008 10:44:44 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

de nada ;^)


8 posted on 04/04/2008 10:46:07 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

I think if the public ever came to Germany or the UK...and examined the healthcare program that is running...there would be a bit of disenchantment over the results.

Here in Germany...the hospitals, doctors, nurses and drug companies are all set to a certain amount of profit. None are happy about the current effect. If you walk into a German hospital...you will notice that most patients sit in a room where there are five or six beds. Private room are for private insurance folks.....who pay more and get more service. The drug companies have various things rigged up so that they end up with more money...but they are under constant investigation with these various schemes. Nurse and doctors are leaving Germany in pretty good numbers...tired of the non-existent pay increases and the dim future of social heathcare.


9 posted on 04/04/2008 10:59:19 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

myth number 6:

Enrolling and spending somebody else’s money on a health care plan has more effect on individual health than a persons own eating and exercise habits which can be done for free.


10 posted on 04/04/2008 11:16:05 PM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

“Average Life Span” is not an accurate way to compare American health care to Canada and Europe. America has more auto deaths, more murders, and more non-white residents. When non-violent white deaths in the USA are compared to non-violent white deaths elsewhere, American lifespans are always the same or better.


11 posted on 04/04/2008 11:21:20 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
I think if the public ever came to Germany or the UK...and examined the healthcare program that is running...there would be a bit of disenchantment over the results.

The Democrat party can only survive by having large portions of the electorate uninformed misinformed. For example, if you do a Goebbel search for this article, which has been around for over a week, it was picked up by very few media outlets. Only one of which that could be marginally included within the MSM - The Washington Times.

12 posted on 04/04/2008 11:24:44 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
When the dems won in the 2006 elections a nitwit lady at work said 'Oh, now our troops can come home and we'll have freeuniversal health care."

Needless to say, our Troops are still kicking a$$ in all theaters of the war on the mohammedans and, thankfully, my Blue Cross Blue Shield still only costs me 90 bucks a month (Yeah, I know my true cost). I mentioned that we have the finest health care in the world, probably the universe for that matter, and that she spends more buying her lunch and coffee but doesn't feel that is too much.

13 posted on 04/04/2008 11:26:05 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay
Enrolling and spending somebody else’s money on a health care plan has more effect on individual health than a persons own eating and exercise habits which can be done for free.

They haven't announced phase II. If you don't eat right and give up your various vices -- no health care for you friend.

14 posted on 04/04/2008 11:26:26 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6
See #12.
15 posted on 04/04/2008 11:32:16 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

“If you don’t eat right and give up your various vices — no health care for you friend. “

Yep, that is what this is all about, they want to control every aspect of our life, including our bodies, what we eat, what we think what we say, how we labor, and our carbon we exhale, they want to raise our kids, and tell us how to have sex.

The human race is in a debate between evolving from a mammal based individuals to something equivalent to an ant colony. Liberals are just a bunch of insect lovers who want humans to be no different, like worker bees who have to eat and work and have sex according to master plan . What we need to stop liberals are some of those insect strips, or unleash a few anteaters at their conventions.


16 posted on 04/04/2008 11:45:17 PM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: seastay
like worker bees who have to eat and work and have sex according to master plan .

It's worse than that... worker bees are females and don't get to have sex at all.

Only drones, who are male, get to have sex with the queen, who is nothing but a breeder who never had the job of worker bee. She's been raised to be a breeder by being given special food in the larval stage. Once the drone has sex with the queen he's pretty much useless and disposable.

17 posted on 04/05/2008 12:07:40 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: seastay
The human race is in a debate between evolving from a mammal based individuals to something equivalent to an ant colony. Liberals are just a bunch of insect lovers who want humans to be no different, like worker bees who have to eat and work and have sex according to master plan ...

Well said.

The human race I think is in a debate that is related to the Bill Bill Gates' style confidence (on another thread) that as China prospers, the world prospers and the U.S. will be reduced in importance commensurate with its percentage of the population, and everything will be just great. What an idiot. Has he thought at all about the history of our civilizations?

We're in a debate about the smartest, best educated, best disciplined, most humane minorities forming alliances and taking point by force if necessary on the path to human thriving, or degenerating to majorities of anarchy, ignorance, cruelty, slavery, and brutal control. At its core it is a moral and even religious issue. It's been happening for centuries and it's going to keep happening no matter who we elect president.

One thing poisonous to America now is poor education, which makes a population gullible enough to buy into the health care myth, global warming, the "recession," and socialism, and lull them into not remembering the joy and greatness in full freedom of Americans during our first two centuries.

18 posted on 04/05/2008 12:25:34 AM PDT by Finny (Democrats are Gov't Mommies. Liberal Republicans are Big Gov't Daddies. Conservatives are adults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

bookmark for later.


19 posted on 04/05/2008 12:37:33 AM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Finny
You make some great points. Poor education leaves people vulnerable to the obfuscations by complication that characterize the health care proposals of Hillary and her ilk.

The solutions are actually pretty simple, as this article shows. The only problem with the solutions is that they don't promote statism.

20 posted on 04/05/2008 3:07:46 AM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson