Posted on 04/07/2008 1:40:26 PM PDT by jhpigott
An upcoming joint US-Israel report on the September 6 IAF strike on a Syrian facility will claim that former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein transferred weapons of mass destruction to the country, Channel 2 stated Monday.
Furthermore, according to a report leaked to the TV channel, Syria has arrested 10 intelligence officials following the assassination of Hizbullah terror chief Imad Mughniyeh.
Their whole [twisted] reason for existance over the last 7 years. The reason there is never a single piece of information placed in the public domain from the libs re wmd's, is because that is the core of their big lie.
told ya:)
If true...it will do nothing of the sort.
For example, Joe Biden and the Democrat leadership are free, even today, to categorically state that "The Surge was a failure".
The MSM reports the assertion...and totally ignores any evidence to the contrary. Thus, in time, a bald lie becomes "conventional wisdom".
If there is evidence that Saddam shipped his WMDs to Syria, the MSM will simply ignore it.
I love it when a plan (finally) comes together..
THIS IS HUGE IF IT’S TRUE. It would have to have details in order to come up with this conclusion and some pretty convincing evidence.
They will say this new info is also a lie. And since Bush is so stupid, it took him 5 years to figure out a good story.
I’d love it if the report could somehow be delivered in a high profile forum...say, as part of the upcoming Congressional testimony by General Petraeus.
Very interesting stuff...
That's the whole article, not an excerpt.
General Tommy Franks said this same thing in his book, written right after the war.
Only if the media had deigned to report it.
Do you remember when Sadaam’s former air force General, who oversaw the transfer of many WMDs to Syria just before the war, talked about his role? The MSM didn’t talk about it much, and when they did, it was just to call him a liar, even though there was plenty of evidence he was telling the truth.
“This might have been useful back in say... 2003!”
How such an important event could have remained hidden for so long is a mystery to me. There must have been hundreds of Saddam Hussein’s henchmen who should have known about the transfer if it had actually taken place — and they all kept the secret to themselves?
The veracity of the news becomes even more questionable.
Yellow flight: jamming air defense and even Lebanese cable tv, bombing the three supposed WMD sites.
Green flight: taking out the Deir al Zahr facility, trucks holding warheads from the NK ship, then taking out the facility on the Euphrates at the turkish border, then drop tanks, land, pick up IDF guys holding an evidence functional nuke who borrow a Syrian truck to cross the Turkish border with it.
Thanks for your earlier feedback, Sir. :)
I’m not finding this article at the JPost. Anyone?
Its is there under the posted link when I click on it.
Say what?
They tracked a NK ship to Tartus, and its nuclear material headed to Deir al Zehr, and at the time I postulated also a NK functional nuke for them to reverse-engineer.
It was a guessing game when this all went down.
I don't understand why Bush wasn't all over this stuff back in the day. He knew the media would never report the truth about the war, or anything else he did. Why didn't he just go to the rest of the American people and show them this evidence? It would have nipped the whole "Bush lied, people died" BS in the bud once and for all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.