Skip to comments.
'Report on Sept. 6 strike to show Saddam transferred WMDs to Syria'
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1207486215610&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull ^
Posted on 04/07/2008 1:40:26 PM PDT by jhpigott
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-179 next last
To: exit82
OK, libs, if Bush didnt lie, who died? Their whole [twisted] reason for existance over the last 7 years. The reason there is never a single piece of information placed in the public domain from the libs re wmd's, is because that is the core of their big lie.
41
posted on
04/07/2008 2:39:05 PM PDT
by
going hot
(Happiness is a momma deuce)
To: Army Air Corps
42
posted on
04/07/2008 2:40:37 PM PDT
by
txhurl
To: bert
I would argue it is more valuable now. If true, it will destroy the whole Democrat rationale for doing nothing for the past 4 years except try to destroy Bush. If true...it will do nothing of the sort.
For example, Joe Biden and the Democrat leadership are free, even today, to categorically state that "The Surge was a failure".
The MSM reports the assertion...and totally ignores any evidence to the contrary. Thus, in time, a bald lie becomes "conventional wisdom".
If there is evidence that Saddam shipped his WMDs to Syria, the MSM will simply ignore it.
43
posted on
04/07/2008 2:40:50 PM PDT
by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
To: shield
I love it when a plan (finally) comes together..
44
posted on
04/07/2008 2:43:01 PM PDT
by
txhurl
To: jhpigott
THIS IS HUGE IF IT’S TRUE. It would have to have details in order to come up with this conclusion and some pretty convincing evidence.
45
posted on
04/07/2008 2:43:27 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
To: jhpigott
I wonder if Bush's recent secret talks with Putin may have discussed the possibility of bringing forth revelations concerning the Russian effort in the transport of WMDs into Syria? Such revelations to the world, with Putin verifying the existence of the WMDs, would destroy the Democrat's entire effort for the last six years.
To: exit82
OK, libs, if Bush didnt lie, who died?They will say this new info is also a lie. And since Bush is so stupid, it took him 5 years to figure out a good story.
47
posted on
04/07/2008 2:49:44 PM PDT
by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: jhpigott
I’d love it if the report could somehow be delivered in a high profile forum...say, as part of the upcoming Congressional testimony by General Petraeus.
48
posted on
04/07/2008 2:51:16 PM PDT
by
denydenydeny
(Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
To: jhpigott
Very interesting stuff...
To: Jewels1091
I'm having trouble getting into the site...anyone else?That's the whole article, not an excerpt.
50
posted on
04/07/2008 2:55:21 PM PDT
by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: tobyhill
General Tommy Franks said this same thing in his book, written right after the war.
51
posted on
04/07/2008 2:57:22 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: pnh102
Only if the media had deigned to report it.
Do you remember when Sadaam’s former air force General, who oversaw the transfer of many WMDs to Syria just before the war, talked about his role? The MSM didn’t talk about it much, and when they did, it was just to call him a liar, even though there was plenty of evidence he was telling the truth.
52
posted on
04/07/2008 2:57:48 PM PDT
by
3niner
(War is one game where the home team always loses.)
To: pnh102
“This might have been useful back in say... 2003!”
How such an important event could have remained hidden for so long is a mystery to me. There must have been hundreds of Saddam Hussein’s henchmen who should have known about the transfer if it had actually taken place — and they all kept the secret to themselves?
The veracity of the news becomes even more questionable.
53
posted on
04/07/2008 2:58:56 PM PDT
by
353FMG
(Vote for the Candidate who will do the least damage to our country.)
To: denydenydeny
Bigger map. I knew Israel went for Saddam's WMDs in the same strike. They had to. I have the flight plans backwards on the Deir al Zahr strike, as I've since learned.
To: Southack; Dog; jeffers; shield
How I think it happened (two planes):
Yellow flight: jamming air defense and even Lebanese cable tv, bombing the three supposed WMD sites.
Green flight: taking out the Deir al Zahr facility, trucks holding warheads from the NK ship, then taking out the facility on the Euphrates at the turkish border, then drop tanks, land, pick up IDF guys holding an evidence functional nuke who borrow a Syrian truck to cross the Turkish border with it.
Thanks for your earlier feedback, Sir. :)
78 posted on
10/07/2007 8:23:42 PM PDT by
txflake (Yes there were WMDs)
54
posted on
04/07/2008 3:01:32 PM PDT
by
txhurl
To: jhpigott
I’m not finding this article at the JPost. Anyone?
55
posted on
04/07/2008 3:04:03 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Ramius
Its is there under the posted link when I click on it.
56
posted on
04/07/2008 3:06:04 PM PDT
by
federal
To: txflake
pick up IDF guys holding an evidence functional nuke Say what?
57
posted on
04/07/2008 3:06:33 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Ramius
58
posted on
04/07/2008 3:07:10 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
To: Ramius
They tracked a NK ship to Tartus, and its nuclear material headed to Deir al Zehr, and at the time I postulated also a NK functional nuke for them to reverse-engineer.
It was a guessing game when this all went down.
59
posted on
04/07/2008 3:11:42 PM PDT
by
txhurl
To: 3niner; 353FMG; Conservative4Ever; bert; Bloody Sam Roberts; pissant
Only if the media had deigned to report it.I don't understand why Bush wasn't all over this stuff back in the day. He knew the media would never report the truth about the war, or anything else he did. Why didn't he just go to the rest of the American people and show them this evidence? It would have nipped the whole "Bush lied, people died" BS in the bud once and for all.
60
posted on
04/07/2008 3:14:48 PM PDT
by
pnh102
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-179 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson