Skip to comments.BREAKING US to admit officially that Saddam WMDs were moved to Syria in a report to come !!!!!
Posted on 04/11/2008 8:33:43 AM PDT by drzz
An upcoming joint US-Israel report on the September 6 IAF strike on a Syrian facility will claim that former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein transferred weapons of mass destruction to the country, Channel 2 stated Monday.
(Excerpt) Read more at jpost.com ...
You've got that right. One hopes it's true, of course, and that the evidence is incontrovertible. But a blurb that short sounds more like a rumor ... and a wishful one at that.
Sometimes rumors are true.... maybe this one is.
This cannot be BREAKING every time a thread is posted.
Should copy story and send to that horrible little Harry Reid! By the way does that troll ever smile???!! What a drip!
But I won’t hold my breath waiting to see if it makes the 6 o’clock news.
It is an astonishing duplicity that the sattelite photos of the Russia trucks have been plastered on the net, but the reality of the movement is yet denied by the DNC sycophantic media. This nation is in deep trouble because of the democrat party whoring media.
The left doesn’t trust America or the Joos so this will be ignored completly.
Yep - and France’s despicable conduct at the U.N. gave him the time to do it. If France had not forced the U.S. to wait, that rat b*****d would not have had time to move them.
Old news to FReepers.... The Dems will immediately call it a pack of lies....
I believe it happened but don't think we'll see any official report about it.
If the administration says that WMDs were moved and we knew it, why wait 5 years to talk about it and what will we do about it now?
Yeah, where's that lying traitorous bastard and his ugly wife been lately?..................
This is just another George bush neocon attempt to start another ILLLEGAL WARRRRRRR!
(did I get the left’s reaction right?)
To most of us, this isn’t a surprise. Before the Gulf War, Saddam moved most of his air force to Iran.
Simple: they’ll either continue to beat the drum that we shouldn’t pre-emptively attack those with WMDs (which will fit nicely with their pro-iranian stance) or they’ll claim we still attacked the wrong country (we obviously should have gone after Syria!) lol.
I can’t imagine a scenario, or any amount of proof, that would cause the MSM to spend any serious time on the matter.
Exactly, MSM is a leftist tool and nothing else. No good reporting - no honest reporting - just reading from the Dem play book. Journalist wantabes but can’ts because they’re suffering from liberal disease.
If true ...this is what I have long hoped would happen
We tolja so ping!
Sorry, but what do the two have to do with one another?
You think so? I don’t. They will simply say they don’t believe it and that the administration is using this as cover before the election. People don’t hear what they wish not to.
Not only that but those Russian trucks were moving under cover of diplomatic immunity. I remember when, just after the invasion started, our air forces “accidently” hosed one of those “diplomatic” convoys heading west from Baghdad and we got a great big UN diplomatic protest from the Russians.... and probably a “knock it off” memo from some CENTCOM lawyer geek.
If we are ging to formally acknowledge this now after 5 years, there must be some kind of environmental pollution issue, or some other quid pro quo we are meeting - maybe a sop to Israel validating its attack on Syria, in exchange for Israel making nice and giving the terrorists the Temple Mount and half of Jerusalem
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.