BREAKING US to admit officially that Saddam WMDs were moved to Syria in a report to come !!!!!

Jerusalem Post ^ | 04 11 2008 | drzz

[drzz]

An upcoming joint US-Israel report on the September 6 IAF strike on a Syrian facility will claim that former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein transferred weapons of mass destruction to the country, Channel 2 stated Monday.

[r9etb]

I think I’ll wait for a little more definitive information. This is just a “tad” sketchy.

You've got that right. One hopes it's true, of course, and that the evidence is incontrovertible. But a blurb that short sounds more like a rumor ... and a wishful one at that.

Sometimes rumors are true.... maybe this one is.

[RightWhale]

This cannot be BREAKING every time a thread is posted.

[LYSandra]

Should copy story and send to that horrible little Harry Reid! By the way does that troll ever smile???!! What a drip!

[SueRae]

AFT.

But I won’t hold my breath waiting to see if it makes the 6 o’clock news.

[MHGinTN]

It is an astonishing duplicity that the sattelite photos of the Russia trucks have been plastered on the net, but the reality of the movement is yet denied by the DNC sycophantic media. This nation is in deep trouble because of the democrat party whoring media.

[LukeL]

The left doesn’t trust America or the Joos so this will be ignored completly.

[Right Cal Gal]

Yep - and France’s despicable conduct at the U.N. gave him the time to do it. If France had not forced the U.S. to wait, that rat b*****d would not have had time to move them.

[theDentist]

Old news to FReepers.... The Dems will immediately call it a pack of lies....

[USS Alaska]

I’ll believe it when I see it.

I believe it happened but don't think we'll see any official report about it.

If the administration says that WMDs were moved and we knew it, why wait 5 years to talk about it and what will we do about it now?

[Red Badger]

And I predict that Joe Wilson will appear on all of the Sunday news shows once that report is released.

Yeah, where's that lying traitorous bastard and his ugly wife been lately?..................

[Holicheese]

This is just another George bush neocon attempt to start another ILLLEGAL WARRRRRRR!

(did I get the left’s reaction right?)

[kabar]

To most of us, this isn’t a surprise. Before the Gulf War, Saddam moved most of his air force to Iran.

[Red Badger]

I don't know what they have to say, it makes no difference anyway - whatever it is, I'm against it! No matter what it is or who commenced it, I'm against it! Your proposition may be good, but let's have one thing understood - whatever it is, I'm against it! And even when you've changed it or condensed it, I'm against it! I'm opposed to it. On general principles I'm opposed to it. For months before my son was born, I used to yell from night to morn - "Whatever it is, I'm against it!" And I've kept yelling since I first commenced it, "I'm against it!"

[messierhunter]

Simple: they’ll either continue to beat the drum that we shouldn’t pre-emptively attack those with WMDs (which will fit nicely with their pro-iranian stance) or they’ll claim we still attacked the wrong country (we obviously should have gone after Syria!) lol.

[Bitsy]

I can’t imagine a scenario, or any amount of proof, that would cause the MSM to spend any serious time on the matter.

Exactly, MSM is a leftist tool and nothing else. No good reporting - no honest reporting - just reading from the Dem play book. Journalist wantabes but can’ts because they’re suffering from liberal disease.

[woofie]

If true ...this is what I have long hoped would happen

[MizSterious]

We tolja so ping!

[Alter Kaker]

Anyone who doesn’t think the WTC was a ‘controlled demolition’ already knows this.

Sorry, but what do the two have to do with one another?

[twigs]

You think so? I don’t. They will simply say they don’t believe it and that the administration is using this as cover before the election. People don’t hear what they wish not to.

[silverleaf]

Not only that but those Russian trucks were moving under cover of diplomatic immunity. I remember when, just after the invasion started, our air forces “accidently” hosed one of those “diplomatic” convoys heading west from Baghdad and we got a great big UN diplomatic protest from the Russians.... and probably a “knock it off” memo from some CENTCOM lawyer geek.

If we are ging to formally acknowledge this now after 5 years, there must be some kind of environmental pollution issue, or some other quid pro quo we are meeting - maybe a sop to Israel validating its attack on Syria, in exchange for Israel making nice and giving the terrorists the Temple Mount and half of Jerusalem