Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Father loses custody of son over lemonade
WZZM 13 Website ^ | 4-28-08 | Brian Dickerson

Posted on 04/28/2008 7:58:13 AM PDT by mombyprofession

If you watch much television, you've probably heard of a product called Mike's Hard Lemonade.

And if you ask Christopher Ratte and his wife how they lost custody of their 7-year-old son, the short version is that nobody in the Ratte family watches much television.

The way police and child protection workers figure it, Ratte should have known that what a Comerica Park vendor handed over when Ratte ordered a lemonade for his boy three Saturdays ago contained alcohol, and Ratte's ignorance justified placing young Leo in foster care until his dad got up to speed on the commercial beverage industry.

Even if, in hindsight, that decision seems a bit, um, idiotic.

Ratte is a tenured professor of classical archaeology at the University of Michigan, which means that, on a given day, he's more likely to be excavating ancient burial sites in Turkey than watching "Dancing with the Stars" - or even the History Channel, for that matter.

(Excerpt) Read more at wzzm13.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: cps; custody; godsgravesglyphs; michigan; mikeshardlemonade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-226 next last
Read the whole story- you'll be "blown away"!!!
1 posted on 04/28/2008 8:00:03 AM PDT by mombyprofession
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mombyprofession

I am betting this ‘professor’ now raises a good Republican


2 posted on 04/28/2008 8:02:35 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mombyprofession

Even if it wasn’t an accident, who cares? The BS this kid went through is far worse for him than a bottle flavored malt liquor.


3 posted on 04/28/2008 8:03:32 AM PDT by lesser_satan (Vote McCain - The Choice who Sucks Less!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mombyprofession
DSS/CPS is all "fouled" up.

This is nothing more than the goon squad sending a message to parents saying "WE RUN THE SHOW."

4 posted on 04/28/2008 8:08:19 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in - Michael Corleone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mombyprofession

after reading the whole story one wonders what trauma the boy will have and for how long being jerked away from all family members like that.....gov’t run amuck......


5 posted on 04/28/2008 8:08:35 AM PDT by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mombyprofession
Clearly Ratte is an outlier of a case.

However, once you have a report of a seven year old publicly consuming an alcoholic beverage, it has to be investigated.

And once it is investigated, it has to be referred to child's services.

The officer on the scene, the supervisor and the child services worker doesn't know Ratte from Adam, and has no clue whether or not this represents a pattern of behavior or an anomaly.

They knew if they ignored it and Ratte's son turned up in an alcoholic coma a few weeks later, they would be raked over the coals and people would be calling for their blood.

Every system that allows such workers discretion is eliminated once that discretion leads to a mistake or two.

6 posted on 04/28/2008 8:08:57 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mombyprofession
Detroit is one of the murder capitals of America...yet they have plenty of time and money for this...
7 posted on 04/28/2008 8:10:39 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty
This is nothing more than the goon squad sending a message to parents saying "WE RUN THE SHOW."

Perhaps it is an indication that the regulations by which the child services administration in MI operates are dictated by the lowest common denominator of child services cases in MI - in other words, the regulations were written with an unmarried teen crackhead's child in mind, not a tenured archaeology professor's child.

8 posted on 04/28/2008 8:12:02 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I think you’ve got it exactly right. It’s a real shame.


9 posted on 04/28/2008 8:12:30 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mombyprofession

I don’t watch that c*ap either, and would never buy anything called Mike’s Hard ........, and caseworkers make me barf!


10 posted on 04/28/2008 8:12:46 AM PDT by paristwelve (.......the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Did you expect competency, rationality and efficiency from the Kwame Kilpatrick administration?


11 posted on 04/28/2008 8:13:45 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mombyprofession

“We are from the government and are here to help.”

Another bunch of brainless bureaucrats “helping the children”. They should all be fired ASAP for allowing this kind of thing to happen.

Worse case scenario the kid would have thrown up and had a hangover in the morning. Instead they wasted thousands of dollars on a simple mistake that could have been dismissed early on. Hospital stay, foster care and who knows how much was spent in legal fees and court proceedings. What a bunch of jackhole dipsticks, thank God I don’t live in that communist hellhole.


12 posted on 04/28/2008 8:14:18 AM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mombyprofession

So how did he drink 12 ounces of Hard Lemonade, and have NO TRACE of alcohol in his blood about 90 minutes later?


13 posted on 04/28/2008 8:15:03 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

investigation is one thing, child abduction is something different.


14 posted on 04/28/2008 8:15:30 AM PDT by absolootezer0 ( Detroit: we're so bad, even our mayor is a criminal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mombyprofession

This guy has a Phd and he has never heard of hard lemonade?


15 posted on 04/28/2008 8:17:24 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grellis

MI ping.


16 posted on 04/28/2008 8:18:06 AM PDT by absolootezer0 ( Detroit: we're so bad, even our mayor is a criminal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mombyprofession
Mr. Ratte's To-Do list:

1) Hire the best contingency lawyer in Michigan
2) Sue the state of Michigan for $100 million
3) Sue the Detroit Tigers for $100 million
4) Settle for $5 million.

17 posted on 04/28/2008 8:18:30 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

How long should it take normal human beings to size up the situation. One problem with our justice system, let alone state bureaucracies, is that we make decisions that used to take 15 minutes into long, bureaucratically-entangled, drawn-out processes. Justice delayed is justice denied.


18 posted on 04/28/2008 8:20:12 AM PDT by jwalburg (Whoever has the most babies gets to set the agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I agree. The headline should read ‘Over an alcoholic drink’ since it wasn’t just lemonade. I’d probably be appalled too, if I saw a young kid drinking an alcoholic drink like that. What would anyone do in the case of a kid openly drinking booze? What if it were beer? No one here would get upset, say something to the parents, call someone? I truly believe it was an honest mistake but still needed to be investigated.

I’ve never had a Mike’s Hard Lemonade and I’ve never seen an ad for it anywhere, but I do know that it’s alcohol, just like hard cider is or that hard sauce is made with rum or brandy. And I know that from *ta da* history books! You’d think Dad would have known that too.


19 posted on 04/28/2008 8:23:19 AM PDT by ktscarlett66 (Face it girls....I'm older and I have more insurance....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg

The problem here is the police officer had no authority in this situation and the father was forced to comply. It was his son and he (mistakenly) was drinking in his presence, a misdemeanor at best. Taking custody of his child far overstepped his authority in this situation.


20 posted on 04/28/2008 8:25:33 AM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
investigation is one thing, child abduction is something different.

Foster care is not abduction.

Again, in Detroit - for obvious reasons - there is very little leeway in the law.

To me what is truly bizarre is that the university was not able to get a top-notch attorney to get an injunction against the child services administration within hours.

Most firms I've worked for would have done that for an employee once he explained the situation to management.

21 posted on 04/28/2008 8:26:23 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ktscarlett66

It’s bottled to look like a soft drink. You probably wouldn’t know it was alcohol unless you searched the label.


22 posted on 04/28/2008 8:26:52 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg

i’d agree with your 15 minutes assessment.

if everyone was really worried about the wellbeing of the child, why is the father not sitting in jail on “contributing to the delinquency of a minor” charges?


23 posted on 04/28/2008 8:27:49 AM PDT by absolootezer0 ( Detroit: we're so bad, even our mayor is a criminal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mombyprofession
Ratte is a tenured professor of classical archaeology at the University of Michigan, which means that, on a given day, he's more likely to be excavating ancient burial sites in Turkey than watching "Dancing with the Stars" - or even the History Channel, for that matter.

Oh well...let this guy go, but hammer the trailer trash that might watch TV.

That's what I gather from this line.

24 posted on 04/28/2008 8:30:36 AM PDT by Fundamentally Fair (There was once consensus that the world was flat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ktscarlett66
What if it were beer?

It functionally is beer, flavored like lemonade. You'd think someone with the education for a PHD would be able to discern the 'hard' part of the lemonade. I wonder what else he got from the vendor when he purchased the Mike's. Maybe Dad had a coke.

25 posted on 04/28/2008 8:31:57 AM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

I know. I looked up an image of it online and it says “Malt Beverage” on it. But I’ve known for years that it was an alcoholic beverage. Anything that’s ‘hard’ is, hard sauce, hard lemonade, hard cider. I’m just amazed that a professor didn’t know that (and I truly think it was an honest mistake on his part).


26 posted on 04/28/2008 8:33:17 AM PDT by ktscarlett66 (Face it girls....I'm older and I have more insurance....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer; ktscarlett66
It’s bottled to look like a soft drink.

It is bottled in a beer bottle.

I believe that Ratte had no clue it was an alcoholic beverage, but it is not deceptively packaged.

27 posted on 04/28/2008 8:34:16 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: xone

I agree. I meant that if the kid were openly drinking a cup of beer at a stadium, there would probably be people thinking it was terrible and have said something. But because it was ‘lemonade’, nothing should have been done. I’m surprised at Dad’s non-knowledge too.


28 posted on 04/28/2008 8:36:14 AM PDT by ktscarlett66 (Face it girls....I'm older and I have more insurance....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
if everyone was really worried about the wellbeing of the child, why is the father not sitting in jail on “contributing to the delinquency of a minor” charges?

Becasue the focus of the law is actually on the well-being of the child and not on punishing the parent.

How could one argue that a law that focused primarily on locking parents up was motivated solely by the child's well-being?

29 posted on 04/28/2008 8:36:24 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
It is bottled in a beer bottle.

Looks a lot like a soda.

30 posted on 04/28/2008 8:38:10 AM PDT by Fundamentally Fair (There was once consensus that the world was flat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mombyprofession
This got blown way out of proportion because no one along the way was willing to take responsibility for the situation and show reasonable discretion. They were all too worried about what might happen if they didn't be extra careful following procedure and then passing the buck to the next person.

I'd suggest that the parents sue, but it was probably the fear of a lawsuit that caused the officer, people at the park, and CPS to handle things the way they did.

It's hard to be glad that it didn't take longer to sort out what should have taken moments, but when lots of people that know very little about what really happened all go overboard trying to do what is in the best interests of the child, things can get very screwed up, and can take a while to straiten out.

31 posted on 04/28/2008 8:39:29 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fundamentally Fair

Looks like a snapple.


32 posted on 04/28/2008 8:39:38 AM PDT by sbMKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ktscarlett66

If this hard lemonade was an alcoholic beverage, wouldn’t the dad have been carded when he ordered it?


33 posted on 04/28/2008 8:39:38 AM PDT by Hyzenthlay (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mombyprofession
Leo (the boy) betrayed no symptoms of inebriation.

The Comerica cop estimated that Leo had drunk about 12 ounces of the hard lemonade, which is 5% alcohol. But an ER resident who drew Leo's blood less than 90 minutes after he and his father were escorted from their seats detected no trace of alcohol.

Not a very good commercial for Mikes Hard Lemonade.

Good thing about this is that everyone involved are probably flaming liberals. Maybe now they'll question some of the crap flowing from the little fiefdoms that are so purvasive throughout local government.

34 posted on 04/28/2008 8:40:28 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Democrats - Stupid is as stupid do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

removing of a child from an upstanding family over something like this is abduction. CPS, the cop that recommended it and the judge that signed off on it should be facing charges.

this is pure and simple abuse of the system. a short interview with the family should have sufficed.

and don’t tell me there’s little leeway in the law. the decision is based on recommendation of CPS and police. if it was this bad, what’s the father being charged with? how much jail time is he facing?


35 posted on 04/28/2008 8:40:39 AM PDT by absolootezer0 ( Detroit: we're so bad, even our mayor is a criminal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

No, many people havent.


36 posted on 04/28/2008 8:40:56 AM PDT by Chickensoup (If it is not permitted, it is prohibited. Only the government can permit....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
You probably wouldn’t know it was alcohol unless you searched the label.

I dunno . . . I think one would have to be pretty dense not to realize that a drink called "Mike's Hard Lemonade" is an alcoholic beverage.

37 posted on 04/28/2008 8:43:20 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ktscarlett66

I doubt he said “Why don’t you give me a Mike’s Hard Lemondae”

He probably said “Lemonade”

The vendor handed it to him and didn’t think that the seven year old was going to be drinking it.

The good professor probably didn’t even glance at the label as he navigated his way to his seats and handed the bottle to his son.


38 posted on 04/28/2008 8:44:12 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Fundamentally Fair

it also comes in a 16oz plastic bottle


39 posted on 04/28/2008 8:45:33 AM PDT by absolootezer0 ( Detroit: we're so bad, even our mayor is a criminal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

To me, it appears bottled similar to beer, not soda. There must have been signs there somewhere saying over 21 only, no? And if I was unfamiliar with the brand, I would certainly read the label. So many beverages these days contain high amounts of caffeine or other ingredients I would not want to consume. The father should have known exactly what he was giving his child. He is smart enough to read a label.


40 posted on 04/28/2008 8:45:59 AM PDT by informavoracious (God BLESS America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Once while getting my muffler fixed I meet the guy who started Mike’s Hard Lemonade, he was preoccupied with his lap top mostly, seemed kinda of a stuffy, smarter than thou type, but I did get in a truth of alcohol, no matter what color, flavor or carbonated, it’s still just poison to the body.


41 posted on 04/28/2008 8:46:07 AM PDT by Son House (God Enlightened me through Charles Gibson, the top Income Tax Rate Should be 15% too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
it was probably the fear of a lawsuit that caused the officer, people at the park, and CPS to handle things the way they did.

That's the problem in America today. Everyone is afraid of lawyers. They should be afraid of me.

42 posted on 04/28/2008 8:46:17 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost

I agree, the name is a hint, but in this day and age, where words often don’t mean what they used to mean, you can’t be sure. And a lot of these “alcopops” are deliberately colored and packaged to look like soda pop. I’m a non-drinker, and when I first saw a six pack of Mike’s Hard Lemonade on the shelf, I wondered if it was alcoholic, but I certainly wasn’t sure.


43 posted on 04/28/2008 8:46:30 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Fundamentally Fair
Looks a lot like a soda.

When you go to a supermarket or a convenience store you have to look hard to find soda packaged in a glass bottle with a beer style metal twist cap.

That's because 99% of soda sold in the US comes in a 20 oz. plastic bottle with a short neck and a white plastic twist cap, not a 12 oz glass bottle with a long neck and a metal twist cap. And 100% of the soda sold at ballparks comes either in a plastic bottle of the kind I've just described, or a plastic cup with a lid and a straw.

So, it doesn't look like a soda at all.

Again, he made an honest mistake, but it is not deceptive packaging at all.

44 posted on 04/28/2008 8:47:06 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
When you go to a supermarket or a convenience store you have to look hard to find soda packaged in a glass bottle with a beer style metal twist cap.

www.jonessoda.com

45 posted on 04/28/2008 8:49:46 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: wideawake; lady lawyer; ktscarlett66
It’s bottled to look like a soft drink.

It is bottled in a beer bottle.

No. It is bottled in a lemonade bottle.

Clear beer bottles have yellow, not grey, liquid in them.


46 posted on 04/28/2008 8:53:50 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
So, it doesn't look like a soda at all.

So you say.

47 posted on 04/28/2008 8:58:01 AM PDT by Fundamentally Fair (There was once consensus that the world was flat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
removing of a child from an upstanding family over something like this is abduction.

Neither of us know whether or not this actually is an "upstanding family." And certainly the city workers on the scene had no way of ascertaining that.

CPS, the cop that recommended it and the judge that signed off on it should be facing charges.

What charges should they eb facing? On what evidence?

this is pure and simple abuse of the system. a short interview with the family should have sufficed.

Short interviews have far too often resulted in dead children.

The case of Nixmary Brown is a famous example.

and don’t tell me there’s little leeway in the law. the decision is based on recommendation of CPS and police.

There is very little leeway, so I will tell you that fact.

CPS and the police, once an incident is reported, cannot say they neglected to follow up because they "had a good feeling" about the situation. There has to be a determination - and the determination has to be made on evidence.

if it was this bad, what’s the father being charged with? how much jail time is he facing?

It seems that I was not clear.

It is entirely possible for a parent to have done nothing that creates criminal liability while still being judged an unfit parent. A parent who has a severe illness that impairs their ability to care adequately for a child, for example. A parent whose job requires them to spend long periods of time away from their child, combined with the unreliability of alternative child care arrangements (babysitter fails to show up on numerous occasions, the parent's sister neglects the niece she promised to care for while the parent was working). And so on.

48 posted on 04/28/2008 8:59:04 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
but it is not deceptive packaging at all.

There are whole bunch of do-gooders that disagree with you.

49 posted on 04/28/2008 9:00:32 AM PDT by razorback-bert (If yer gunna regret this in the mornin, we kin sleep til afternoon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Fundamentally Fair

The bottle looks like lemonade to me. I would have guessed that “hard” meant....stronger, tarter flavor. (less sugar, more lemon)

It needs to spelled out right on the front label, if it is an adult beverage!


50 posted on 04/28/2008 9:02:33 AM PDT by kactus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson