Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj
The Congressional wing isn’t even interested in winning back a majority. 2 to 4 years of McCain could see us having barely 1/3rd of Congress. Is that preferable ?

That's speculation. It's not speculation to say that Clinton and Obama will be a disaster as commander-in-chief.

I will not ask one of the people who puts themselves between me and Al Qaida to fight under the commmand of a blathering incompetent. I will not. You shouldn't either.

204 posted on 04/30/2008 8:02:36 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Silverback

You can’t dismiss that as “speculation.” You know full well that every time you put a RINO in charge of government (be it state or federal), the party shrinks rapidly in size. Look at Eisenhower, who couldn’t be bothered to do the necessary party work and we went from having majorities in the House and Senate to only 1/3rd of Congress in 1958. 6 years. It took a quarter century to recover from the Senate losses. It took FORTY years to recover from the House losses.

You think this country will survive 40 more years of the anti-American party in charge of Congress ? That’s not speculation. That’s reality. McCain has always been more interested in playing footsie with the rodents (and was quite prepared in 2004 to become one). Ignore that at your own peril. I won’t.


275 posted on 04/30/2008 7:14:49 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson