Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Hit By Earthquake
Drudge Report ^ | Updated:08:00, Monday May 12, 2008 | Sky News

Posted on 05/12/2008 12:27:28 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe

An earthquake measuring 7.8 on the Richter scale has hit China's Sichuan province. The tremor was felt across the entire region - shaking buildings in the capital, Beijing, as well as the Thai capital, Bangkok, and Hanoi, the capital of Vietnam. US Geological Survey said the quake struck 57 miles north-west of the city of Chengdu at 2.29pm local time (6.28am GMT).

Some 10 million people live in Chengdu.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: asia; china; chinaquake; earthquake; eq; quake; sichuan; usgs; wenchuan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,541-1,549 next last

1 posted on 05/12/2008 12:27:28 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bd476; Ezekiel

ping


2 posted on 05/12/2008 12:28:01 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

2 major natural disasters in a short time. Scary. Prayers to all.


3 posted on 05/12/2008 12:29:32 AM PDT by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

7.8 is quite high. However, I don’t know the region in China that it hit that well. But if there was shaking all way from Beijing to Hanoi... it’s gotta be a big one. Hope it struck somewhere where there’s not a lot of people . . . then again it is China.


4 posted on 05/12/2008 12:29:37 AM PDT by edmond246 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

Oops, should be 2 natural disasters. Delete the “major.”


5 posted on 05/12/2008 12:30:03 AM PDT by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

How about “major natural disasters”.


6 posted on 05/12/2008 12:32:01 AM PDT by taxesareforever (We'll never forget Matt Maupin and his service to our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

Like the cyclone disaster, reports of injuries and deaths will be slow in coming out.


7 posted on 05/12/2008 12:33:21 AM PDT by taxesareforever (We'll never forget Matt Maupin and his service to our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

After taking a look at Chengdu, China, it does appear the epicenter was located near a mountain range in central China, not too close to any major population centers. We can hope for the best.


8 posted on 05/12/2008 12:34:09 AM PDT by edmond246 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

9 posted on 05/12/2008 12:34:17 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe
7.8 is nearing 'Great Quake' status on Richter.

This one could be very bad indeed.

10 posted on 05/12/2008 12:34:56 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

With the southern section of the San Andreas fault being 150 years overdue for a bigone and the Hayward fault ready to slip, I would not want to be anywhere near California anytime soon.


11 posted on 05/12/2008 12:36:13 AM PDT by LukeL (Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

This page seems to be useful determining how close the epicenter was to population centers. It’s from the USGS.

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/pager/events/us/2008ryan/index.html


12 posted on 05/12/2008 12:36:28 AM PDT by edmond246 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edmond246; peggybac

I don’t know much about earthquakes at all. But this sounded big.

Drudge is slow on the details. I checked Yahoo news, and didn’t find any new info.


13 posted on 05/12/2008 12:36:38 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

And finally, my last bit of looking at the USGS site indicates around 21,000 people in the ‘extreme exposure zone’.

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/pager/events/us/2008ryan/index.html#shakemap


14 posted on 05/12/2008 12:38:43 AM PDT by edmond246 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

Thanks.


15 posted on 05/12/2008 12:39:06 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

The violent doesn’t sound too cool either. And that’s what, 86 thousand?


16 posted on 05/12/2008 12:42:20 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

That’s what it appears to be. However, I am currently attempting to find the same population map for other significant earthquakes. However, I cannot seem to find it. Using past maps, I was thinking we can get an estimate on how accurate these maps are in predicting damage, and so forth. Your welcome, by the way, the more information we have the better we can look at the whole picture. :-)


17 posted on 05/12/2008 12:46:01 AM PDT by edmond246 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080512/ap_on_re_as/china_earthquake

Update here. I guess we’ll have to wait and see how accurate it is.


18 posted on 05/12/2008 12:46:53 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: edmond246
That particular region of China -- Sichuan Province -- hit by this quake is by far the most populated of all provinces in that nation.

This is an older population map of China, but you can see that the density of people in Chengdu is greater than anyplace else:

cHINA POPULATION AND DENSITY MAP

The buildings there are typically very old or of suspect construction if they're modern. It's not a particularly modernized province. The effects of this quake could be dreadful.

19 posted on 05/12/2008 12:47:28 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edmond246

Also appears, there has been an aftershock. Mag. 6; same area.


20 posted on 05/12/2008 12:47:51 AM PDT by edmond246 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,541-1,549 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson