Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do We Still Have Grants and Shermans?
Prime ^ | May 22, 2008 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 05/22/2008 3:03:45 AM PDT by moderatewolverine

Who becomes a general — and why — tells us a lot about whether our military is on the right or wrong track. The annual spring list of Army colonels promoted to brigadier generals will be shortly released. Already, rumors suggest that this year, unlike in the recent past, a number of maverick officers who have distinguished themselves fighting — and usually defeating — insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq will be chosen.

For example, scholar-soldier Col. H. R. McMaster, Special Forces Col. Ken Tovo, and Col. Sean MacFarland — all of whom helped turn Sunni insurgents into allies — could, and should, make the cut.

These three colonels have had decorated careers in Iraq mastering the complexities of working with Iraqi forces in hunting down terrorists and insurgents. And they — like David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq — in the past have not always reflected the Army establishment in Washington. Their unconventional views about counterinsurgency warfare do not hinge on high-tech weaponry, tanks, artillery, and rapid massed advance.

But most wars are rarely fought as planned. During the fighting, those who adjust most quickly to the unexpected tend to be successful. And in almost all of America’s past conflicts, our top commanders on the eve of war were not those who finished it.

(Excerpt) Read more at primetimepolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: army; iraq; mcmaster; military; oif; praise; seanmacfarland; tovo; vdh; victordavishanson; war; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: T-Bird45

I don’t know if it used to be different many years ago, but during at least the recent past once you make Colonel you can stay in until 30 regardless of how many times you are passed over for General. Most 06s don’t make General as you know, and tend to stay in until at least 26 years (when the pay sort of maxes out).

I do believe he will make it this time. He came in the Army in 1984, so has 6 more years regardless. I believe Sean came in about 1982, but I could be off a year. I also believe he will make it.


41 posted on 05/22/2008 6:43:49 PM PDT by Proud Legions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
We should also note: in a typical Civil War battle, each side lost more soldiers than the US has lost to date in all of Iraq.

And while we're at it, I recently had the opportunity to question the experts (Civil War park rangers) about civilian deaths. Typically there were few to none, with the total for the war less than 1,000.

In fact, the biggest single number of civilians who died happened during Sherman's march through Georgia, but it was not of white Georgians. It was freed slaves following Sherman's army, hundreds of whom drowned trying to cross a river where one of Sherman's generals had destroyed the bridge.

42 posted on 05/22/2008 6:43:53 PM PDT by BroJoeK (A little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: moderatewolverine; neverdem; Lando Lincoln; quidnunc; .cnI redruM; SJackson; dennisw; ...


    Victor Davis Hanson Ping ! 

       Let me know if you want in or out.

Links:    FR Index of his articles:  http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=victordavishanson
                His website: http://victorhanson.com/
                NRO archive: http://www.nationalreview.com/hanson/hanson-archive.asp
                Pajamasmedia:
   http://victordavishanson.pajamasmedia.com/

43 posted on 05/23/2008 6:50:23 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
On the other hand Lee was the direct result of the Army at the time. That said, most of the good senior officers at the beginning of the war were southerners.

Grant and Sherman were good, but Lee was in a class by himself.
44 posted on 05/23/2008 6:55:47 AM PDT by JamesP81 (George Orwell's 1984 was a warning, not a suggestion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
These three colonels have had decorated careers in Iraq mastering the complexities of working with Iraqi forces in hunting down terrorists and insurgents. And they -- like David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq -- in the past have not always reflected the Army establishment in Washington. Their unconventional views about counterinsurgency warfare do not hinge on high-tech weaponry, tanks, artillery, and rapid massed advance.
Thanks neverdem.
45 posted on 05/23/2008 6:57:18 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Profile updated Monday, April 28, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moderatewolverine

What about Robert E. Lee???


46 posted on 05/23/2008 6:58:41 AM PDT by cyborg (Living Strong every day since March 12, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

For the Appomattox campaign, the chart shows 10,780 casualties for Grant; none for Lee. That’s obviously incorrect. Lee’s army suffered numbers of casualties from the time when the Petersburg defenses were evacuated to the surrender at Appomattox.


47 posted on 05/23/2008 7:05:36 AM PDT by bcsco (To heck with a third party. We need a second one....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

I copied that chart to Excel and did some calculations.

Total casualties comes to 506,359.

Comparison of Grant/Sherman (which includes Thomas but not Sheridan) to their opponents: Grant/Sherman: 88,733; Opponents: 111,458.


48 posted on 05/23/2008 7:15:26 AM PDT by bcsco (To heck with a third party. We need a second one....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Lee's major failing, IMHO, was as a strategist. At the operational level, he had few peers, but as a senior general, whose advice was sought, and listened to, by one of the most difficult chief executives of any country in history [Davis]; his lack of strategic insight was mind boggling.

I don't know if he considered the Confederacy an appendage, or an ally of Virginia, but he doesn't seem to have seen it as a polity superior to his native state.

Case in point, the run up to the Gettysburg campaign. There were major discussions in Richmond about sending Lee and two Corps of his army to the West, which was the critical theater of operations in the Civil War, to help Bragg.
Lee did NOT want to go. So he proposed the raid into Pennsylvania in its stead. That is strategic myopia to the level of near blindness. And the South paid.

49 posted on 05/23/2008 7:20:43 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker

That’s Andrew Jackson.


50 posted on 05/23/2008 7:21:39 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Proud Legions

Thanks for that perspective...and for your service.


51 posted on 05/23/2008 7:24:06 AM PDT by Bahbah (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr
Doh!


52 posted on 05/23/2008 7:31:18 AM PDT by WVKayaker ( "Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It's the transition that's troublesome..." I. Asimov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr
I meant to post this pic...


53 posted on 05/23/2008 7:33:23 AM PDT by WVKayaker ( "Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It's the transition that's troublesome..." I. Asimov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

It is interesting that this topic came up again. My thoughts when it comes to Grant and Cold Harbor -

Grant’s true strength was in that he never gave up. Shiloh was a good early example of this. There would be many more such examples before the war was through. Unlike many of his contemporaries, Grant never lost a battle through inaction or inactivity. Grant was not afraid to try different things until he found a winning combination and once he found that combination he held on with the stubbornness and unswerving focus of a pit bull.

Once Grant took over the Army of the Potomac he pursued the Army of Northern Virginia with a dogged tenacity which would not be denied. Cold Harbor was one of the few times where he was forced to admit that he could not win through sheer force of will. The other battles which eluded him were faced during his two terms as president.

It is important to note specifically what Grant admits to in his memoirs when he expresses remorse over Cold Harbor. He doesn’t admit that the battle should never have taken place. He doesn’t admit that the early charges where so many men fell were ill conceived and which he ordered over the objections of his commanders. The fact that some of his commanders were slow to act likely created a bit of doubt in Grant’s mind about whether the failure of the charges was due to the fact that his Army was incapable of taking the Confederate positions or whether the earlier failures were the result of a lack of well timed coordination.

What Grant admitted to regretting specifically was the last charge that he ordered. That final charge was ordered over a vehemence of his subordinate commanders which approached mutiny. He seems to recognize that the other charges were necessary for learning and understanding the situation, but the last charge did not serve any other purpose than to confirm the grim reality of the futility of the situation, and that his commanders had been correct all along.

Given the earlier failures of his commanders to coordinate their attacks properly, Grant could have taken this as his excuse for why he ordered that final charge thus passing the blame onto the shoulders of other. The fact that he didn’t do this is a great testament to Grant’s sense of honor and responsibility.

The Siege of Petersburg was approached in the same manner Grant approached his other battles. Grant slowly felt around for his opponents weakness extending his lines day after day till he finally found the point at which Lee could no longer hold on.


54 posted on 05/23/2008 9:40:50 AM PDT by contemplator (Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker
I meant to post this pic...

Man, does he ever look different without the beard! Just goes to show you what a spa makeover and the right shade of lipstick will do for a feller...oh, yeah, and losing the cigar...

55 posted on 05/23/2008 9:45:51 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
Lee has simply enjoyed better PR

You can say that again. Not only Lee but the entire Southern cause. The whole "Lost Cause" mentality all but relegated Grant to the dustbin of history while elevating Lee to a status of near-godlike genius. The fact of the matter is that both Generals were very good in their own ways.

Grant's approach to reconstruction after the war also doomed him in the PR department especially when the early-mid 20th century historians got through with him. Grant held firm against the appeasers who wanted to let the South work out the issue of race relations on their own. The appeasers eventually got their way. It was to cost not only Grant's reputation but the civil rights of African Americans for almost 100 years. It is very telling that after all of this time, Grant's standing in the Presidential rankings is finally being re-evaluated in a positive manner and his star is rising again.
56 posted on 05/23/2008 9:58:30 AM PDT by contemplator (Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kb2614

What a great quote!

I didn’t know that he said that.


57 posted on 05/23/2008 10:10:02 AM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: contemplator

Grant conducted the greatest campaign ever fought on North American soil. At Vicksburg. Strategically sound, operationally innovative and tactically superb.


58 posted on 05/23/2008 2:47:12 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Proud Legions; alfa6; An Old Man; Archangelsk; archy; BCR #226; in the Arena; BlueLancer; ...

Very interesting post, and thank you for you service.

And a treadhead ping, since this is a very worthwhile article by VDH, and your post concerns Armor officers.


59 posted on 05/23/2008 4:13:16 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (<===Non-bitter, Gun-totin', Typical White American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr; Wavrnr10

>>Sherman proved in his writings both before the Civil War and after, that he understood warfare in a very unique way that few others do, and that has proven to be timeless - Hap Arnold and others in the US Army Air Forces were using Sherman’s tactics against the Japanese.

That willingness to really punish your adversary through to complete victory is one of the themes in Victor Davis Hansen’s “Carnage and Culture”. Recommended, if you haven’t read it.


60 posted on 05/23/2008 5:13:25 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (<===Non-bitter, Gun-totin', Typical White American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson