Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You Bet Your Ass: Clinton’s “Garbage Man” Takes a Ride to the Dump
Blackstarnews ^ | June 1st, 2008 | Geoffrey Dunn

Posted on 06/01/2008 2:42:25 PM PDT by SJackson

Poor Harold Ickes.

Ickes—President Clinton’s former deputy White House chief of staff and now both a key political advisor to Hillary Clinton and a member of the Democratic National Party (DNC) rules committee—broke into a temper tantrum Saturday as DNC officials forged a compromise to give back Florida and Michigan all their delegates, but only with half of their voting power. In the case of Michigan, it also called for a revised delegate count.

Winding up on the short end of a landmark 19-8 vote, Ickes swore. He whined. He threatened. He made an ass out of himself.

“This motion [regarding the Michigan allocation of delegates] will hijack—hijack—remove four delegates won by Hillary Clinton and most importantly reflect the preferences of 600,000 Michigan voters,” Ickes ranted. “This body of 30 individuals has decided that they are going to substitute their judgment for 600,000 voters.”

Ickes also asserted that Clinton reserved her right to appeal the decision to the DNC credentials committee.

It was both a lie and a last-ditch bluff by the Clinton machine to hold-up the Democrats come their national convention later this summer in Denver.

And totally disingenuous. This is the same Harold Ickes who in August of last year voted to strip both Florida and Michigan of their convention delegates for staging their party primaries too early in the season—and against the rules of the DNC. Rules that Ickes had voted to uphold.

Today, he was singing a completely different tune. And with a straight face. No, make that with an angry face, or even more accurately, a trademark angry face. Ickes is a notoriously bad loser. “Was the process flawed?” Ickes barked rhetorically. “You bet your ass it was flawed!”

Perhaps a little background is in order.

Harold McEwen Ickes is a child of power and privilege. His father, Harold L. Ickes, served as Secretary of the Interior under Franklin Roosevelt. He is a graduate of Stanford University and Columbia Law School. Less ceremoniously, he served as the model for the character Howard Fergerson in Joe Klein’s best-selling expose of the Clintons, True Colors.

In the Clinton White House, Ickes was known as the “Garbage Man.” He was fired by Clinton in 1996 after his role in several questionable Clinton fundraising schemes was brought to light. In a lengthy New York Times profile of Ickes in 1997, Michael Lewis noted that “Ickes has been caught up in so many of Clinton's scandals and crises that he came to describe his function in the White House as ‘director of the sanitation department.’''

He is also a Clinton loyalist. He covered up the Gennifer Flowers scandal. He arranged for White House visits by John Huang to raise money for Clinton’s 1996 re-election campaign. He also ran Hillary Clinton’s 2000 Senate race.

And, as is often the case with children of privilege, Ickes doesn’t think that rules necessarily apply to him. According to Newsweek, Ickes once bit the leg of a foe in a political clubhouse brawl and threatened to slam a congresswoman into the pavement.

That’s class.

He’s also been known to battle with his teammates. Rumors were rampant that he’d been at odds with fellow Clinton campaign strategist Mark Penn, who was forced out after lobbying on behalf of the Colombian government. And as Clinton began lagging behind in the delegate count, it was the combative Ickes who devised Clinton’s take-no-prisoner strategy on the campaign trail.

It has backfired in the campaign, and it backfired yesterday in Washington at the DNC committee gathering. No one has ever accused Harold Ickes of being a skilled negotiator or an effective deal-maker, and his inability to do either on Saturday marked the final straw that broke the back of the Clinton candidacy—for good.

There were a dozen Clinton supporters on the Rules Committee, and only eight for Obama, but when the smoke had cleared and three of Clinton's supporters voted for a compromise, Ickes acted like a spoiled brat who vowed to take his toys with him.

Only he didn’t have any toys to take.

Like many members of the Clinton inner-circle these days—and that includes the Senator and the ex-President themselves, along with James Carville, Lanny Davis, Paul Begala, Howard Wolfson, and Mandy Grunwald—Ickes is displaying a peculiar brand of petulance. All of these power players had jumped on the Clinton bandwagon confident, if now downright arrogant, about their chances of taking over the White House. They were odds-on favorites.

That arrogance bred overconfidence, and Ickes & Co. mishandled the game plan from day one. They let delegates go in Iowa and other caucus states, while Obama assumed a lead that they couldn’t overcome. Then it was Ickes who started talking about “pledged delegates” switching votes. Once again, the bulldog mentality backfired.

But yesterday, Ickes and the rest of the Clinton clique got their comeuppance. The members of the DNC rules committee made it clear that the Democratic Party no longer belongs to the likes of the Clintons and Harold Ickes. It now belongs to Barack Obama.

You bet your ass.

---------------------------------------

Award-winning filmmaker and journalist Geoffrey Dunn, Ph. D., is the former recipient of a both a John L. Senior Fellowship to the Cornell University Graduate School of Government and a National Newspaper Association Award for Investigative Journalism. His most recent film is

Calypso Dreams. His article for The Black Star News on racism in the Clinton campaign can be read here: http://blackstarnews.com/?c=135&a=4470


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Hillary Clinton’s Disgraceful Campaign: Racism and Hypocrisy

By Geoffrey Dunn

April 23rd, 2008

http://blackstarnews.com/?c=135&a=4470

In the aftermath of the Pennsylvania Democratic primary — a race in which Senator Hillary Clinton had a 20-point lead only a few months ago — the racism and hypocrisy of the Clinton campaign was laid bare for all a nation to scorn.

Desperate and willing to do anything to win, the Clintons resorted to a naked form of racism aimed directly at white working-class voters in the rural portions of the state. Their message: Barack Obama cannot win because he’s black.

In the early stages of the campaign, it was Clinton’s cadre who kept playing the race card. In New Hampshire, Clinton’s co-chair, Billy Shaheen, accused Obama of being a drug dealer; then there was the photograph of Sen. Barack Obama in Somalian garb leaked to the press by Clinton’s staff.

In the aftermath of the South Carolina primary, former President Bill Clinton compared Obama’s victory to those of Jesse Jackson in 1984 and 1988. His message was clear: Obama was a marginal, black candidate.

Then came the disgraceful remarks of Geraldine Ferraro, who could not, and would not, shut her mouth. “If Obama was a white man,” she charged, “he would not be in this position." And she was adamant and unapologetic amid the resulting outcry. "Every time that campaign is upset about something, they call it racist,” she proclaimed. “I will not be discriminated against because I'm white."

Say what?

The Clintons refused to publicly call for Ferraro’s resignation. Ferraro remained unrepentant when she finally did resign. “The Obama campaign is attacking me to hurt you,” she bitterly wrote Hillary. And she never apologized for her remarks.

To anyone who has followed the Clinton campaign closely, it is all too apparent that her top political strategists — reeling from losses from coast to coast and badly miscalculating the grassroots power of the Obama movement — made a tactical decision to go negative, as that would be the only way for Clinton to stop Obama and somehow allow her to steal the nomination.

And go negative they did — with a subtle yet consistent racism underscoring every turn. The now notorious red-phone-at-3:00-a.m. television ad used by Clinton during the Texas primary, as Harvard sociologist Orlando Patterson noted in the New York Times, was reminiscent of D. W. Griffith’s racist film Birth of a Nation, which helped revive the Ku Klux Klan.

In Pennsylvania, Gov. Ed Rendell, who headed up Clinton’s campaign, was publicly saying that white voters in the Keystone State would not vote for Obama because he was black. Rendell’s remarks were racist from the get-go, but no one in the white media called him on it. Indeed, the media began playing the game.

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos — who worked as Bill Clinton’s press secretary and lied through his teeth on Clinton’s behalf (where’s the journalistic “objectivity” here?) — brought up Obama’s relationship to former ‘60s radical Bill Ayers. And the rest of the media went bonkers over Obama’s all-too-honest remarks about conservative white voters hanging on to God and guns.

Amidst so much fury signifying nothing, Hillary Clinton finally did her own bidding. Racism is as racism does. She boldly linked Obama with Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and Wright with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. That linkage was patently racist at its core — yet, once again, no one in the mainstream media so much as blinked. In so doing, Clinton was echoing the views of rightwing conservative and white supremacist Sean Hannity. Talk about shameful.

And when asked about Reverend Wright by The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Clinton declared, “Given all that we have heard and seen, he would not have been my pastor. While we don’t have a choice when it comes to our relatives, we do have a choice when it comes to our pastors or our church.”

As anyone who has read the two major recent biographies of Hillary Clinton (Her Way: The Hopes and Ambitions of Hillary Rodham Clinton, by Jeff Gerth and Don Van Natta Jr.; and A Woman in Charge: The Life of Hillary Rodham Clinton by Pulitzer-prize-winning journalist Carl Bernstein) knows all too well, she will do whatever she has to do and say whatever she has to say in the unbridled (and unscrupulous) pursuit of power. The ash heap of her duplicity sprawls across decades and across various regions of this country — from Arkansas to the White House, from Illinois to, well, now, Pennsylvania.

Clinton is an inveterate liar — I am sorry, there is truly no other word for it — and as her ill-fated presidential campaign tumbles toward its inevitable demise, the personal deception that is at the core of her personality, and of her career, continues to reveal itself.

As we all know, truth may be slow of foot, but it is always inevitable. Only this past weekend, as Clinton continued to reference Reverend Wright in her stump speeches, the filmmaker Michael Moore reminded us that in 1998, Reverend Wright had actually been a guest at the Clinton White House, for a “prayer breakfast,” after Bill Clinton’s rather tawdry affair with intern Monica Lewinsky had been made public.

“Thank you so much for your kind message,” Clinton wrote Wright after his visit. “I am touched by your prayers and by the many expressions of encouragement and support I have received from friends across our country. You have my best wishes.”

And guess what? According to the just released schedules of Hillary Clinton by the National Archives, she was in attendance at that breakfast, too. With the one-and-only Jeremiah Wright. While her husband was seeking salvation and forgiveness.

The hypocrisy is staggering.

But not surprising. “We know there are still many Americans who will never vote for a black man,” Moore observed. “Hillary knows it, too. She's counting on it.”

1 posted on 06/01/2008 2:42:27 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

I don’t like his candidate, but he rightfully smacks Ickes and Clinton, both Clintons.


2 posted on 06/01/2008 2:43:12 PM PDT by SJackson (It is impossible to build a peace process based on blood, Natan Sharansky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
My memory is that the book was titled Primary Colors, not "True Colors".

Further, I recall that Mr. Ickes is the grandson, not the son, of the Ickes that served FDR.

3 posted on 06/01/2008 2:47:11 PM PDT by Publius (Another Republican for Obama -- NOT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Bump with no comment.


4 posted on 06/01/2008 2:48:27 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Is the Democrat Party ready for a black or female nominee? Demonstrably not. Popular lesson learned? Republicans are racist and misogynistic.

5 posted on 06/01/2008 2:51:21 PM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

It shows the wedge Clinton has driven between herself and the Black vote, not to mention all the Democratic Big wigs POed at her campaigns heavy handed tactics.


6 posted on 06/01/2008 2:52:22 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Publius

The Clinton Ickes is the son of the FDR Ickes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_M._Ickes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_L._Ickes


7 posted on 06/01/2008 2:52:48 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Did anyone catch Ickes question about “cognative association”, whaterver the h#ll that is?

It was such a hand grenade, that he wouldn’t even persue it.


8 posted on 06/01/2008 2:53:02 PM PDT by NTHockey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie

Wow. Old Harold must have reproduced late in life. Young Harold doesn’t look much older than myself.


9 posted on 06/01/2008 2:56:57 PM PDT by Publius (Another Republican for Obama -- NOT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
If Obama weren't in the race, he'd be kissing Clinton butt, just like all the rest of the suddenly starchy leftwing Obamacists.

And btw--Sean Hannity a "white supremacist?" Heh. This pansy obviously doesn't know what a white supremacist really is.

10 posted on 06/01/2008 3:01:19 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
“This body of 30 individuals has decided that they are going to substitute their judgment for 600,000 voters.”

Not that I really care, but this is exactly what Clinton planned to do after she had all of the Michigan and Florida delagates....

.... have the "Super-delegates" substitute their judgement for ALL of the other delegates that were for Obama.

I hope the "Rat Convention" is an ugly mess, it serves them all right.

11 posted on 06/01/2008 3:03:20 PM PDT by SteamShovel (Global Warming, the New Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Old Widower Harold married a 25-yr old when he was 64.


12 posted on 06/01/2008 3:05:19 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
No way they'd let Hillary run against McCain, because he could beat her.

So their hitching to the obamawagon, which, I believe, an act described in the dictionary under the listing, "Faustian Bargain." Of course, The listing "Democratic Strategy" lists "Faustian Bargain" as a synonym; as do Communist-, Socialist-, Leftist-, and Fascist-Strategy.

13 posted on 06/01/2008 3:05:49 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Obama's a front man. Who's behind him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

This is way too funny...

They could have just left the CURRENT RULES THAT EVERYONE AGREED TO in place.

Geez... what can the hildebest HAVE on all these people to scare them into such acts of stupidity. How many names are in the 900 FBI files?

(Just WHO ARE all the people in the FBI files anyway, has anyone ever asked that?)


14 posted on 06/01/2008 3:10:28 PM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Then came the disgraceful remarks of Geraldine Ferraro, who could not, and would not, shut her mouth. “If Obama was a white man,” she charged, “he would not be in this position." And she was adamant and unapologetic amid the resulting outcry. "Every time that campaign is upset about something, they call it racist,” she proclaimed. “I will not be discriminated against because I'm white"


Ferraro is right. And when Obama was about to be sworn into the Senate, he himself admitted he wouldn't have been there if he was white.
15 posted on 06/01/2008 3:16:50 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Clinton was echoing the views of rightwing conservative and white supremacist Sean Hannity.

Slander!

16 posted on 06/01/2008 3:19:26 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie
Old Widower Harold married a 25-yr old when he was 64.

What did they talk about?

17 posted on 06/01/2008 3:24:36 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Why _was_ the Blind Imam blind, anyway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
and the RATS, take another one in the..................HA ha!!!

18 posted on 06/01/2008 3:26:24 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©® - CTHULHU/SHOGGOTH '08 = Nothing LESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregoryFul

What bullshit. The Clintons should be kissing Hannity’s ring, along with Limbaugh, Ingraham,Levine,O’ Reilly, Coulter, Savage/Weiner, and a host of others who call themselves ‘conservatives’. They alone have kept her alive for several months with linp-wristed treatment of Hill and daily repititious attacks on Obama. The Operation KAOS crap. They’ve all done everything in their power to deliver her the nomination. It hasn’t worked...YET. Until she gives her concession speech, I’m not buying that it’s over, though.


19 posted on 06/01/2008 3:29:19 PM PDT by The Ghost of Rudy McRomney (Using Hillary to nip Obama's heels is like beating a dead horse with an armed nuclear bomb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Make that “the appropriately named Ickes” Ick!


20 posted on 06/01/2008 3:33:06 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson