Skip to comments.
Exclusive: Limited US attack on Iranian Revolutionary Guards bases in sight.
Debkafile ^
| 06/03/08
Posted on 06/05/2008 8:24:07 AM PDT by mulder1
Exclusive: Limited US attack on Iranian Revolutionary Guards bases in sight
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airstrikes; alqods; attack; bombiran; debka; iran; iraq; proliferation; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: WayneS
Why LIMITED?I'm not calling the shots. And Tehran should be mighty glad of that. ;-)
21
posted on
06/05/2008 8:40:13 AM PDT
by
Allegra
(If you lived here, you'd be home by now.)
To: JRios1968
You have been looking for your socks for the last four years... I think they're in Iran.
High winds and all, y'know.
22
posted on
06/05/2008 8:41:27 AM PDT
by
Allegra
(If you lived here, you'd be home by now.)
To: mulder1
Where’s that Iraqi Air Force? Shouldn’t THEY be making the “limited” strikes?
23
posted on
06/05/2008 8:42:49 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: Allegra
24
posted on
06/05/2008 8:44:50 AM PDT
by
JRios1968
("If you go over a cliff with all flags flying, you are still going over a cliff"--Ronald Reagan)
To: Allegra
25
posted on
06/05/2008 8:49:04 AM PDT
by
Danae
(Remember: Obama = Pull out from Iraq. PLAN on voting, or accept responsibility for the consequences.)
To: Allegra
I have to agree with that. IMHO, we ought to team up with Israel and take out what needs to be taken out. The Muslim world respects force and the willingness to use it. Thats about it.
26
posted on
06/05/2008 8:50:59 AM PDT
by
Danae
(Remember: Obama = Pull out from Iraq. PLAN on voting, or accept responsibility for the consequences.)
To: mulder1
Never happen......**unless** we're prepared to go to full-scale war with Iran because if we launch a limited attack the 9th Century knuckledraggers in Tehran will go bananas.If they do,some of their missiles (or maybe most of them) will be headed to Israel and the Israelis will certainly know what to do if *that* happens.
27
posted on
06/05/2008 9:01:09 AM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(Will the dancing Hitlers please wait in the wings? We're only seeing singing Hitlers.)
To: Danae
If true, a big if, this may start limited but the Iranians will never be able to restrain themselves...watch all the EU yellow pukes start screaming for that US misslile defence...comeon let’s git er done!
28
posted on
06/05/2008 9:03:56 AM PDT
by
iopscusa
(El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
To: onedoug
Because this US assault is not planned to extend to Irans nuclear installations,...Then what's the point??? Poke a finger in Iran's eye without touching their nuke plants? Of course this is DEBKA...
29
posted on
06/05/2008 9:07:49 AM PDT
by
Obadiah
(I remember when the climate never changed, then Bush stole the election.)
To: mulder1
Irans Armed Forces are fully prepared to counter any military attack with any intensity and to make the enemy regret initiating any such incursions. Oh, how I'd love to see us kick a**... Unfortunately, Debka's never right.
To: Obadiah
Just my humble guess that at the time of the surge and that weak Natl Intelligence Estimate, Gates got the administration to secretly promise no attack on Iran in return for Iran vastly reducing activity in Iraq. We do need to stabilize Iraq first, there may be a grand strategy here to peel Sunni Syria away from Iran, stabilize Iraq and avoid war with Iran.
31
posted on
06/05/2008 9:15:50 AM PDT
by
Williams
To: Williams
Good guess. That is basically what I postulated at the time the surge started having an effect.
32
posted on
06/05/2008 9:21:33 AM PDT
by
Obadiah
(I remember when the climate never changed, then Bush stole the election.)
To: Allegra
Sigh. How many predictions of attacks on Iran have been made? Don’t bother me until the bombs are falling. And where has Bush learned how to make war in his second term? LBJ? Limited attacks, sending messages and all that. What happened to victory?
33
posted on
06/05/2008 9:26:51 AM PDT
by
Jabba the Nutt
(I'm just a typical bitter, white, heteronormative space worm clinging to guns and God.)
To: Obadiah
I think that is what Pelosi is tying into with her comment about Iran’s “good will”. Of course there is no good will involved but I think she’s trying to let the cat out of the bag on what she knows or suspects.
34
posted on
06/05/2008 9:29:04 AM PDT
by
Williams
To: Allegra
What a load of BS.If the U.S. is going to attack Iran it won't be limited.If it is it will only delay the inevitable.
Once Iran gets those Nukes she's building you can almost guarantee she'll be giving them to every terrorist group she sponsors and they will be used.Here as well as in Israel.
Its better to have an unlimited attack on Iran's military and strategic targets,especially her nuclear facilities than allow her to threaten civilization with destruction.
35
posted on
06/05/2008 9:31:09 AM PDT
by
puppypusher
(The world is going to the dogs.)
To: Jabba the Nutt
What happened to victory?If you could have seen Iraq four years ago and could see it now, you'd see victory.
Sigh. How many predictions of attacks on Iran have been made? Dont bother me until the bombs are falling.
I didn't even post this thread, nor did I ping anybody to it. I merely dissed the source. I'm all for going after Iran.
36
posted on
06/05/2008 9:32:45 AM PDT
by
Allegra
(If you lived here, you'd be home by now.)
To: mulder1
Two interesting reasons:
1 - A limited strike against border sites might provoke an over-reaction from Iran, giving justification to strike further targets, including their nuclear sites. An interesting way to bypass political restrictions on a direct strike against nuclear facilities.
2 - Just leaking this information may have caused a defensive pullback from border sites, creating a lull or at least a delay in Iranian support inside Iraq that could be taken advantage of.
To: mulder1
The Sky is falling .....the sky is fallling!
38
posted on
06/05/2008 9:33:51 AM PDT
by
badpacifist
(Personal attacks on someones opinion of a "news article" you happened to post is asinine.)
To: puppypusher
What a load of BS. Pretty much what my post said. Perhaps I was too subtle in my disdain for DEBKA?
39
posted on
06/05/2008 9:34:41 AM PDT
by
Allegra
(If you lived here, you'd be home by now.)
To: mulder1
Hmmm, every target is not deserted, sounds like a success without firing a shot!
40
posted on
06/05/2008 9:42:04 AM PDT
by
BillT
(God said it, that settles it whether I believe it or not! (Bible rules))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson