FreeRepublic Posts Introduced Into Evidence Against Mark Steyn

June 5, 2008

[AJFavish]

Interviewed by Hugh Hewitt today, Mark Steyn said that posts from FreeRepublic were introduced into evidence in the Canadian proceeding against him.

[Drango]

[dforest]

You are giving me heart palpitations. Right on.

We are supposed to sit here and play PC while Ahmandidajobie is traveling the world proclaiming that we will be wiped out real soon.

Makes me sick. We need our tax money to NOT be paying for footbaths and hate preaching madrassas.

Who knows, maybe we will wake up someday when it is too late.

[mkjessup]

You’re absolutely right.

The West has got to come to the realization that we ARE in a struggle for our survival as a civilization, the end game for the Islamofascists is to either force all of us infidels (that’s you and me) into converting to Islam, or if we refuse, we get the Nick Berg treatment with a rusty blade.

Any so-called ‘religion’ which, as one of it’s tenets, preaches the oppression and/or murder of it’s opponents is NOT a religion, it is a hate organization, supporting terrorism, and is not entitled to any protections of any laws anywhere on the planet.

If we were talking about a particularly rabid strain of La Cosa Nostra, traveling throughout the world, murdering people at random, arranging mob hits for whatever reason or for no reason, you can be sure that the FBI, Interpol, Scotland Yard (just to name three of the largest law enforcement organizations) and others would be in pursuit of such murdering scumbags, providing them with no refuge, no sanctuary ANYwhere.

In this case, we have the same sort of virulent killers, hiding behind the masquerade of ‘religion’, but their objectives are far from religious, their objectives are political and ideological, and their methods are genocidal.

If the stooges (such as the fools on this ‘BC Human Rights’ commission who carry the water of the Islamofascists are not smacked down and put into their place, and stripped of any and all authority and official sanction, we are going to see our terrorist enemies using these methods constantly, not just for the advantage of legally harassing their opponents, but for gaining valuable intelligence data about those who oppose them, through court records, filings, etc.

We’re at war and only some of us seem to realize it.

[dforest]

BTTT, I might add that util people realize the fight is right here on our own soil, we are lost. We can’t fight this only by sending troops to the ME. We have to rally the troops here at home.

[texas booster]

Just for the record (and before it becomes chiseled in the granite of British Columbia "human rights" jurisprudence), I wasn't aware I was being rude to my accusers after the TVOntario show. The very last words on air were me saying, "You wanna go to dinner?", and Khurrum Awan yelling back "No!" But, as the host Steve Paikin and his producers reported at some length on their website, Khurrum and I and the two gals stuck around for an hour of relatively civil conversation. In fact, I got the impression one of the ladies was growing rather fond of me, which, to be honest, was the main reason I hung about. But, now I come to think of it, that was the way it went at high school. You figure you're doing great and then next morning you overhear her telling her best friend by the lockers that she thought you were a dweeby limpet with halitosis. Unfortunately, in today's fractious legal environment, if Khurrum Awan thinks you're a dweeby limpet with halitosis who can't dance and has dried sweat rings under his cheesecloth shirt, he can add it to the long list of actionable "human rights" grievances to be laid before multiple tribunals and commissions.

Wow, this sure sounds like high school. Not just my time personally, understand, but the entire high school scene where everyone puffs themselves up way too much.

Come to think of it, I think that the Canadian Islamic Council is acting very much like Western teenage girls, very prissy. Almost Metrosexual. Which would be a compliment to most members of the media.

Maybe they should issue a fatwa against themselves until they grow a thicker skin.

[zip]

ping

[AuntB]

LOL!

[Congressman Billybob]

Does anyone have an e-mail address for the Canadian Commission that is conducting this kangaroo court against Steyn? I'd like to lay a statement directly across their bow.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article, "The War about War"

[IncPen]

ping

[pissant]

Damn, I hope they used some of mine. Those snivelling queers and jihadists can go ruck a fope

[ButThreeLeftsDo]

You may have just made the list......

;-)

[Stentor]

We’re at war and only some of us seem to realize it.

[Dr.Zoidberg]

Are we famous yet?

I'd personally prefer being infamous.

It carries a more devoted following.

[magooey]

We’re at war and only some of us seem to realize it.

Well then, it follows that the actions of this "Human Rights Court" are subversive to the successful conduct of the war. This war was very clearly declared by jihadis such as Osama bin Laden in his fatwas in the '90's. It is legitimate that the members of the Court are treated appropriately. A suggestion would be internment for the duration of the conflict.

The bias of the Court in denying admission of evidence relating connections between the organization that brought the action to Court and the Libyan government tends to imply gross bias. I hope it is actionable in the legal system in Canada.

Since evidence was introduced from Free Republic, based in the USA, I would hope that may open the door to legal action in the USA for attempting to stifle the constitutional right of Freedom Of Speech that is in effect here.

The litigants have taken a smattering of hyperbole, and tried to make a mountain out of it. A murrain on the litigants and the Human Rights Court for giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

[budwiesest]

Any so-called ‘religion’ which, as one of it’s tenets, preaches the oppression and/or murder of it’s opponents is NOT a religion, it is a hate organization,

Got me to thinking (not always a good thing- I admit). We should allow for people to hate. Holding it in probably isn't a good idea. They can hate us and we can hate them, however, acting on this 'emotion' may be more than mere aggression, it may be a possible act of war.

What does that mean? It means that, when you act-out against people for whatever reason, "The People" may now act as if you are a threat. A smackdown has been long in coming but would pay big dividends- were some punk country like Iran to get spanked internationally.

If you're going to be a world leader, you must assume the Alpha One Male attitude. Anything less is like holding melted ice-cream on a stick.

We should invite some Ayatollahs to a nuclear demonstration, (kind of like a duck-shoot, but they'd probably feel they're the duck, so that's out.) Sunglasses and lots of sunscreen and I bet you create some new followers of this 'new religion'. Next, you walk a camel about 1500 yds out, hand him the scope and let him watch what a .50cal BMG does to a nomad's KIA. "Y'all wanna talk about oil now?"

[Blind Eye Jones]

Steyn’s been ripping off my ideas for years, I forgive him because it is for a good cause and such...

[antonia]

I was sent a FReepmail today that one of my comments posted a long while ago was entered into evidence against Steyn. So be it. I am not going to back down on my opinion. The TRUTH is that the Muslims are going to win unless we fight back within the US as well as overseas.
I am irritated that I have been singled out. I adore Steyn. He is right. Is that something to be ashamed of, or Americans, is that something to be proud of?
If we are done fighting because of Canada, would someone please let me know?
Geesh, I am PO'ed Really, would Steyn want me to lie?

Please! Can you post the comment that the Canadians are using? Thanks!

[Lucius Cornelius Sulla]

Ping to #60

[antonia]

Naiyer Habib (one of the complainants) now on the stand. From India, came to Canada in 1973. Lived in Saskatchewan until 2004, then moved to Abbotsford, B.C. (A British Columbia Muslim, at last!)

>snip<

"Anyway. Habib says he found all this "humiliating... dishonouring... questioning our morality." "

>snip<

 

The Muslim's attempt to control speech is an attack on our freedoms of speech. Their attempts to impose their morality is dishonoring. They started it. They have dishonored and humiliated us by accepting our hospitality and then not only criticizes our culture but attempting to impose their religion on us, but also by the innumerable attempts to terrorize us, of which this court case is one.

[mkjessup]

I believe it is the BC 'Human Rights Tribunal' that is responsible for this absurd mockery currently in progress:

http://www.bchrt.gov.bc.ca/

I would suggest the above website as a starting point.