Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Questions Constitutionality Of Light Bulb Ban
Say Anything Readers Blog ^ | June 20, 2008 | Anna

Posted on 06/23/2008 8:25:30 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20

WASHINGTON – Members of Congress are beginning to have second thoughts about the ban on incandescent light bulbs effective in 2014 as a result of an energy bill signed into law earlier this year. Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, says his objection is very basic – the Constitution doesn’t authorize Congress to do anything remotely like banning a product that has been used safely and efficiently for more than 100 years in favor of Chinese-imported compact fluorescent light bulbs that pose considerable health and safety risks.

Extensive cleanup is required by the Environmental Protection Agency for simply breaking a bulb. When a bulb, which contains mercury, is broken, according to the EPA, the room must be evacuated for 15 minutes and aired out with windows, but not before all glass is removed, placed in a sealed glass jar and disposed of outside. Any remaining glass must be picked up with tape. In addition, central heating or air conditioning units must be turned off.

Wait… Environmental Protection Agency must be called for a broken bulb?

(Excerpt) Read more at sayanythingblog.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; 17pctapproval; commerceclause; congress; energy; govwatch; lightbulbs; tedpoe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last
To: Publius6961

The fear that it might one day be required doesn’t justify claiming it is required today.


101 posted on 06/23/2008 12:05:37 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: thackney
The fear that it might one day be required doesn’t justify claiming it is required today.

I agree.
Where did I claim it's required today?

102 posted on 06/23/2008 12:09:11 PM PDT by Publius6961 (You're Government, it's not your money, and you never have to show a profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

That was the reason for my first post. The article above said it was required.


103 posted on 06/23/2008 12:13:14 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
The ban is stupid, but arguing that it is unconstitutional won’t help. Not enough people are ready to get the federal government out of the business of deciding what individual are allowed to own.

In fact, I doubt there would be a majority on this board who would allow people to grow Marijuana in their own back yards and smoke it. But if congress can ban that, they certainly can ban you from using incandescent light bulbs.

That's a good point. If we misuse Constitutional powers for "good" ends, then we allow others to misuse those same powers for "bad" ends.

We'd be better off with a more originalist approach to Congressional commerce power- across the board.

104 posted on 06/23/2008 1:07:03 PM PDT by timm22 (Think critically)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY

In addition to your argument take into account that the EPA can and has inserted itself into the inspection and sale of homes. Got mold? May as well tear it down and rebuild for all it will cost you. With the bulbs all they have to do is mandate a sweep of the home that is for sale for even minute quantities of mercury. Detect it and suddenly you are now liable for time consuming and expensive cleanup and reinspection before you can sell. Then again, you can probably become rich by starting a company that specializes in inspecting and cleaning up micro quantities of mercury from the new bulbs by gouging the desparate home sellers.


105 posted on 06/23/2008 1:17:41 PM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20
the Constitution doesn’t authorize Congress

I suggest that readers respond with a list of legislation the Congress has enacted that the Constitution does not empower them to enact.

Where in the Constitution is the “herein granted” power enumerated?
Article 1, Section 1 - All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

The Constitution’s words clearly state that if it does not specifically say Congress has the enumerated power to do it, then Congress can’t do it.

106 posted on 06/23/2008 1:29:59 PM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20; FrPR; enough_idiocy; rdl6989; IrishCatholic; Normandy; Delacon; ...
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

107 posted on 06/23/2008 2:54:29 PM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

George The Pinhead Bush agreed with it several months ago; therefore, don’t blame it entirely on Algore & Co.


108 posted on 06/23/2008 4:10:59 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

No kiddin !


109 posted on 06/23/2008 4:49:57 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: MrB

1933.


110 posted on 06/23/2008 11:30:46 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

I think it was about this January (not before).

My sister was visiting us from the U.S.A., and it was from that timeframe. I remember being so angry at Bush I was jumping up and down from pure unadulterated anger.


111 posted on 06/24/2008 12:09:55 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

Where do I sign up? The time is now.


112 posted on 06/24/2008 5:50:52 PM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson