Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama supports supreme court reversal of gun ban
guardian.co.uk ^ | 6/27/08 | Suzanne Goldenberg and Elana Schor

Posted on 06/26/2008 6:59:41 PM PDT by melt

· Candidate's stance at odds with former position

· Democrat backs death penalty for child rapist

Barack Obama intensified his campaign to appeal to voters on the life-and-death issues of the American heartland yesterday by stepping away from his past support for gun control.

In the latest in a series of policy reversals for the Democratic presidential candidate, Obama came out in support of yesterday's supreme court decision overturning a gun ban in the city of Washington that had been a model for fighting urban crime.

He had previously supported the Washington ban, the strictest in the US.

It was the second time in 24 hours that Obama had shifted towards a more conservative position. On Wednesday, he took issue with the supreme court for striking down the death penalty for cases of child rape that do not involve murder.

In yesterday's decision, judges struck down Washington's 32-year-old gun ban by a five-to-four margin, saying it was incompatible with the second amendment of the constitution. "Whatever the reason, handguns are the most popular weapon chosen by Americans for self-defence in the home, and a complete prohibition of their use is invalid," the conservative Justice Antonin Scalia said. However, the judges defended the need for firearm bans in schools and public buildings.

Immediately after the ruling Obama and the Republican candidate, John McCain, both sought to exploit one of the most emotive political issues. McCain tried to revive charges that Obama was out of step with smalltown values. Obama ran into controversy last April for telling a fundraiser that Americans in small towns clung to guns and religion out of bitterness.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2faced; banglist; guns; gunvote; heller; lying; mccain; notbreaking; obama; obamalies; propagandawingofdnc; rights; scotus; secondamendment; topicabuse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: melt

I get the feeling that Suzanne Goldenberg and Elana Schor
of The Guardian are displeased and disillusioned with their Communist Messiah. They’re really piling on here.


21 posted on 06/26/2008 7:22:38 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Yes
And they are buying it...........


22 posted on 06/26/2008 7:23:45 PM PDT by Thinkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: melt

He’s got the Left in the bag, now he’s moving to the right.

Who thinks he’s going to take Hillary! along for the ride?


23 posted on 06/26/2008 7:23:50 PM PDT by GatorGirl (Election 2008--It's all about the judges!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt

“Obama supports supreme court reversal of gun ban”

NO he doesn’t.

What this black racist supports is stealing votes though bald-faced lies.


24 posted on 06/26/2008 7:24:08 PM PDT by Gator113 (Drill here, drill now, or face the hangman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt

Pandering.

That’s it.....


25 posted on 06/26/2008 7:25:47 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (The Constitution Of The United States. 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt

Kerrypalooza 2008!


26 posted on 06/26/2008 7:27:47 PM PDT by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt
....crabbin' right towards the center....ObamaMessiah : "Wow, I've never been here before, This is Kansas (fly-over country)....I'll just click my Red (Marxist) Shoes, and be back in Never-NeverLand...(where all the media questions are "softballs").
27 posted on 06/26/2008 7:29:27 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (If you aren't "advancing" your arguments,your losing "the battle of Ideas"...libs,hates the facts 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt
Yea, Riiiiiight Osama Hussein Obama.

Only the criminally insane buys that bull!

28 posted on 06/26/2008 7:30:55 PM PDT by RasterMaster (Rudy McRomneyson = KENNEDY wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt

Obama supports NOTHING Constitutional in the way of individual rights. He says what ever is convenient. If the communists on the SCOTUS had voted to support banning guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens, he would have lauded it with mounds of praise that his CHANGE was taking place.

Communist bastard.


29 posted on 06/26/2008 7:31:44 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster
Osama HUSSEIN Obama voter:


30 posted on 06/26/2008 7:34:20 PM PDT by RasterMaster (Rudy McRomneyson = KENNEDY wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: melt

A one-vote shift on the Supreme Court.

Do you realize just how fragile that margin is? So far, the Supreme Court has not had to face a filibuster (like they do in the Senate) by the minority on any of the judgments passed, but later gatherings on the bench have been known to overturn earlier rulings. There used to be a demand made upon the usurpers that they at least provide a reasoned explanation of WHY there may be a reversal, but more and more, those “reasoned explanations” turn to means not found within settled case law or plain Constitutional language, going so far as to deem themselves expert pollsters who “know” the pulse of the country. Or they pick and choose among conclusions made by the law courts of foreign countries, where there do not exist the same parameters of what constitutes “justice” and “parity”.

In an honest world, this should have been a unanimous finding SUPPORTING the Constitutional rights contained within the Second Amendment. But four (FOUR!) of the justices had reservations of such nature, they could not see the incongruity.


31 posted on 06/26/2008 7:35:36 PM PDT by alloysteel (A taxpayer voting for Obama - is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt

How would one of his SCOTUS appointees have voted on this case?


32 posted on 06/26/2008 7:37:09 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt

"It's not the gun ban I thought it was."

33 posted on 06/26/2008 7:38:23 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

though = through


34 posted on 06/26/2008 7:40:28 PM PDT by Gator113 (Drill here, drill now, or face the hangman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: buck jarret
No point in counting flip flops for either of them.

We could have a pool on the over/under.

35 posted on 06/26/2008 7:42:51 PM PDT by dfwddr ( Duncan Hunter .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: melt

Obama is changing his story now for political reasons. If, and when, he is elected he will revert back to being the hard core leftist that we all know he is.


36 posted on 06/26/2008 7:42:57 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt

politically correct for a democrat,

but it will cost him the election.


37 posted on 06/26/2008 7:45:17 PM PDT by ken21 ( people die + you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


38 posted on 06/26/2008 7:52:32 PM PDT by Roscoe Karns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hattie
Obama always votes with the majority.
39 posted on 06/26/2008 8:13:09 PM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulf BeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: melt

100% flim flam. This is the best the Democrats can offer.


40 posted on 06/26/2008 8:15:44 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson