Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

These glassy granular fragments of basalt are eruption evidence. (Credit: Adam Soule and Claire Willis)

Explosive volcanism on the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel ridge, Arctic Ocean

Roughly 60% of the Earth's outer surface is composed of oceanic crust formed by volcanic processes at mid-ocean ridges. Although only a small fraction of this vast volcanic terrain has been visually surveyed or sampled, the available evidence suggests that explosive eruptions are rare on mid-ocean ridges, particularly at depths below the critical point for seawater (3,000 m)1. A pyroclastic deposit has never been observed on the sea floor below 3,000 m, presumably because the volatile content of mid-ocean-ridge basalts is generally too low to produce the gas fractions required for fragmenting a magma at such high hydrostatic pressure. We employed new deep submergence technologies during an International Polar Year expedition to the Gakkel ridge in the Arctic Basin at 85° E, to acquire photographic and video images of 'zero-age' volcanic terrain on this remote, ice-covered ridge. Here we present images revealing that the axial valley at 4,000 m water depth is blanketed with unconsolidated pyroclastic deposits, including bubble wall fragments (limu o Pele)2, covering a large (>10 km2) area. At least 13.5 wt% CO2 is necessary to fragment magma at these depths3, which is about tenfold the highest values previously measured in a mid-ocean-ridge basalt4. These observations raise important questions about the accumulation and discharge of magmatic volatiles at ultraslow spreading rates on the Gakkel ridge5 and demonstrate that large-scale pyroclastic activity is possible along even the deepest portions of the global mid-ocean ridge volcanic system.

You can access linked abstracts of references from that link.

1 posted on 07/12/2008 8:51:22 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

I am going to get flamed for this sarcastic comment..... but here it goes....

It is all global warmings fault isn’t.... :)


2 posted on 07/12/2008 8:52:49 PM PDT by Americanwolf (Don't Think a cop will help? Try calling a crack head next time......!! Thanks Thorin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I saw some pretty incredible footage on one of the “educational” channels a number of years ago of a volcano erupting under the ocean. After seeing that, it was a lot easier from me to understand things like El Nino and what the jugheads call “global warming.” I may be wrong but that molten lava spewing out into the ocean like that has to do something to the temperature of the water. Imagine what it would do to the ice above it.


4 posted on 07/12/2008 8:58:13 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The U.S. Constitution was not written to protect those who want to destroy America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

>>
...For one thing, explosive volcanism like this involving the release of large amounts of carbon dioxide may not be so rare. “Our community is going to embrace this pretty quickly as a research topic,” he said...
<<

The velocity of the embrace is proportional to how well it agrees with the Current Wisdom.


9 posted on 07/12/2008 9:02:11 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
Catholic University professor pioneers lunar telescope-making method

Arsenic risk high in Sumatra, Myanmar, Cambodia: study (ground water contamination)

Human embryonic stem cells developed from 4-cell embryo; world first may lessen ethical concerns

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

14 posted on 07/12/2008 9:27:07 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The shocking thing about this article is that it is in the NY Times. One would expect that liberal rag to bury any reporting explaining the true cause of the Arctic ice melting.


15 posted on 07/12/2008 9:37:41 PM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
New picture just released


17 posted on 07/12/2008 9:44:59 PM PDT by Pylon (Remember boys, flies spread disease, so keep yours closed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

But what about the Gorwellian Concensus on CO2?


18 posted on 07/12/2008 9:55:36 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The carbon budget changed,

Human contribution to co2 increased levels are now substantially reduced with this finding.

Time to DRILL DRILL DRILL!


19 posted on 07/12/2008 10:41:58 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Refueling accident at the UFO base?
22 posted on 07/12/2008 11:53:56 PM PDT by SeaWolf (Orwell must have foreseen the 21st Century US Congress when he wrote 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem


Do shallow (1500 meters) eruptions count too? Loihi has been active for at least twelve years. Of course Kilauea has been erupting for the last 25 years and pouring lava into the ocean and creating a nuisance with noxious vog. Wait......we have no precious ice cap here so it's like tossing a match into the sea.

27 posted on 07/13/2008 3:27:49 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Making the estimate that the ice is about 3 meters thick in the arctic. (Of course, it is much thicker some places and much thinner in others.) Then the energy of Mount St. Helens would melt about 100 square kilometers of ice in the Arctic. (Assuming the energy were transmitted straight to the ice, without heating the water.)

The bottom line
The Arctic goes through some serious changes in sea ice extent every year as the season change. The sea ice extent changes by about 10 million square kilometers every year. 100 square kilometers is about one hundred thousandth of that. It would take a thousand volcanos the size of Mount St. Helens every year to account for just 1% of the yearly Arctic ice loss.

The numbers for the above conclusion are worked out here

Best Regards,
ClimateSanity
28 posted on 07/13/2008 9:08:05 PM PDT by ClimateSanity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

thanks neverdem for both:

Arsenic risk high in Sumatra, Myanmar, Cambodia: study
(ground water contamination)
AFP | 07/11/08
Posted on 07/12/2008 12:14:22 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2044328/posts


29 posted on 07/13/2008 10:08:22 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson