Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. rescues Fannie, Freddie
marketwatch.com ^ | 7/13/08

Posted on 07/13/2008 3:31:33 PM PDT by Sleeping Freeper

U.S. rescues Fannie, Freddie Treasury Department raises credit line, has power to buy companies' stock. Fed will open discount-lending to two government-sponsored mortgage lenders. Paulson calls for new regulatory controls.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: banking; bernanke; bush; fanniemae; fed; freddiemac; gorelick; govwatch; jamiegorelick; nau; paulson; printmoney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-224 next last
To: Sleeping Freeper; autumnraine
Futures shot UP on the news. It baffles me.

Futures go up because we are bailing these companies out, which means more INFLATION. Dollar inflation means higher oil futures and gold as hedges. This has nothing to do with Iran and everything to do with the devaluation of our currency from Fed policies.
61 posted on 07/13/2008 6:37:03 PM PDT by charles m (Ask not what what your country can do for you; ask what you can do to make Michelle Obama proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JasonC; mulligan
People practice one entry accounting. They pretend every raise they ever got was merited as a real increase, but the nasty financiers and gubmint went and mucked everything up and took half of it back through inflation and what-not. Nobody ever thinks the first part was about as much due to more money sloshing around as to anything they did themselves.

Give me a break. If that were the case, then experienced folks would be paid nearly the same as entry level, as the market would price experience out.

Fact is, the market will set both wage levels. Besides, even if raises are half from increased money supply, the money supply increase not only gives the raise, but takes it away via the dollar being worth less.

Nice try at the sleight of hand, but the fact is, responsible people are forced to pick up the tab for the irresponsible.

62 posted on 07/13/2008 6:37:11 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Why not use the audited financials in their 10-K? That's a public document, right on the web. For free.

I am sure hoping you have a missing sarcasm tag.

63 posted on 07/13/2008 6:37:51 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers

Got a better idea?

Perhaps 60% unemployment and millions out of work, but a strong dollar, is better?

Sheesh.


64 posted on 07/13/2008 6:38:26 PM PDT by RockinRight (I just paid $63 for gas. An icefield in Alaska is NOT the Grand Canyon. F--- the caribou.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Southack; ikka

Can’t disagree with either of you there.


65 posted on 07/13/2008 6:39:07 PM PDT by RockinRight (I just paid $63 for gas. An icefield in Alaska is NOT the Grand Canyon. F--- the caribou.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
Futures will go up until Iran's nuclear program...

I think the futures in question are stock index futures (SPX) and not oil futures.

66 posted on 07/13/2008 6:39:24 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

We will have 60% unemployment and the dollar will be trash in the next year or so.

It is too late for a better idea. This problem has been in the making since FDR. Deal with it. We will have to whether we like it or not.


67 posted on 07/13/2008 6:42:09 PM PDT by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publici scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

Oil goes up on any excuse now. If a Saudi prince takes a shit, oil goes up.


68 posted on 07/13/2008 6:42:27 PM PDT by RockinRight (I just paid $63 for gas. An icefield in Alaska is NOT the Grand Canyon. F--- the caribou.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers

Again, GOT A BETTER IDEA?

You don’t have one, or you’d have given it.


69 posted on 07/13/2008 6:43:27 PM PDT by RockinRight (I just paid $63 for gas. An icefield in Alaska is NOT the Grand Canyon. F--- the caribou.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Freeper
These entities should never have existed in the first place. Now that they do, I see little option esides bailing them out...and squandering the wealth of the nation in the process.

If this ONLY amounts to the Fed lending money and taking their toxic collateral, it will only cost us about $2trillion in inflation (that's spread across EVERYONE). This is the best possible outcome.

If the Taxpayer actually has to make up the difference between "mark to market" and "mark to model", it'll cost us $2-$3trillion directly...every TAXPAYER, which is less than 1/2 the population.

70 posted on 07/13/2008 6:44:07 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2031535/posts

Take a look and tell me what would fix this any time soon?”


71 posted on 07/13/2008 6:44:56 PM PDT by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publici scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

That’s the problem with the “well as a taxpayer I don’t wanna bail out such and such bank” argument.

The economic consequences in this case of letting a Fannie Mae fail, are FAR WORSE for most people’s wealth.

It sucks, but it’s the truth.


72 posted on 07/13/2008 6:44:59 PM PDT by RockinRight (I just paid $63 for gas. An icefield in Alaska is NOT the Grand Canyon. F--- the caribou.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers

I can tell ya one thing...if the GOP were smart, they’d publicly expose the Democrats responsible.


73 posted on 07/13/2008 6:45:45 PM PDT by RockinRight (I just paid $63 for gas. An icefield in Alaska is NOT the Grand Canyon. F--- the caribou.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
I can tell ya one thing...if the GOP were smart, they’d publicly expose the Democrats responsible.

Well the GOP isn't smart. It's likely every bit as corrupt in this as the DEMs. Which is why we need a new political party to represent the Conservative citizens. A party which platform is centered in the Constitution and not protecting the corporate board rooms profit margins.

74 posted on 07/13/2008 6:50:59 PM PDT by cva66snipe ($.01 The current difference between the DEM's and GOP as well as their combined worth to this nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
...a new political party to represent the Conservative citizens.

How many of them are there, really? Maybe it is time for secession.

Arm yourself.

75 posted on 07/13/2008 6:52:51 PM PDT by MichiganConservative (Fools get what they deserve in the end. You are responsible for the government that enslaves you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
I can tell ya one thing...if the GOP were smart

And if my aunt had cajones, she'd be my uncle.

76 posted on 07/13/2008 6:53:50 PM PDT by dfwgator ( This tag blank until football season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

As far as I can tell BY THEIR OWN ACTIONS, the GOP is in bed with the demoncrats. ( yelling is reserved for the GOP itself, not you personally)

They aren’t smart because they don’t want to upset their apple cart anymore than the dems do. The whole system is corrupt and we will pay for it. Unemployment, Amero, you name it. A welfare state (used to buy votes) is reliant on an inflated fiat money. But all fiat money gets destroyed by the greed the eventually gets unleashed by politicians. I hope it does not come to this now. But the possibilities are aligning themselves into that probability.


77 posted on 07/13/2008 6:54:12 PM PDT by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publici scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
It has all sorts of competitors, but we refuse to use them. We refuse to develop oil, either. The green left wants the west to deindustrialize for the sake of Gaia, and the red left wants to destroy capitalism for the sake of socialism. And everyone is letting them, so they will.

Let's quit blaming the left for a change, the right ain't doing much either to help. We don't need Barack to bring us socialism, it's already here in the 2nd term of Bush.
78 posted on 07/13/2008 7:00:30 PM PDT by charles m (Ask not what what your country can do for you; ask what you can do to make Michelle Obama proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

On second thought I do have a better idea, but it is personal one, not one to fix this increasing fiat money problem.

Own gold, silver and get out of US dollars. Don’t own them.

That is the best you can do.


79 posted on 07/13/2008 7:04:17 PM PDT by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publici scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

That’s a mighty big if


80 posted on 07/13/2008 7:04:23 PM PDT by Lurkus Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson