Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi: Bush Drilling Proposal a Hoax Unworthy of Serious Debate on Gas Prices
Marketwatch.com ^ | 7/30/08 | Speaker of the House Nacy Pelosi

Posted on 07/30/2008 12:59:11 PM PDT by DallasBiff

Last update: 2:06 p.m. EDT July 30, 2008 WASHINGTON, July 30, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Speaker Nancy Pelosi released the following statement today in response to remarks by President Bush on energy this morning at the White House: "The President knows, as his own Administration has stated, that the impact of any new drilling will be insignificant - promising savings of only pennies per gallon many years down the road. Americans know that thanks to the two oilmen in the White House, consumers are now paying $4 a gallon for gas. But what Americans should realize is that what the President is calling for is drilling as close as three miles off of America's pristine beaches and in other protected areas. "The President has failed in his economic policy, and now he wants to say, 'but for drilling in protected areas offshore, our economy would be thriving and the price of gas would be lower.' That hoax is unworthy of the serious debate we must have to relieve the pain of consumers at the pump and to promote energy independence. "Today, the New Direction Congress will vote on legislation to bring down gas prices by taking crucial steps to curb excessive speculation in the energy futures market. The President himself could lower prices by drawing down a small portion of our government oil stockpile, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. SOURCE Office of the Speaker of the House

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; 2008; bush; congress; democratcongress; democratparty; democrats; domesticoil; donothingcongress; drillheredrillnow; drilling; drillorgetoffthehill; economy; elections; energy; energyprices; environment; environmentalists; envirowackos; gasprices; greenparty; greens; nancypelosi; ninepercentnancy; nobama08; nodirectioncongress; offshoredrilling; oil; oilprices; pelosi; yap; yapyap; yapyapyapyapyap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: DallasBiff
The Rats are screwing America and it's a shame that almost 50% of Americans can't see it.
21 posted on 07/30/2008 1:12:23 PM PDT by tobyhill (fraud -noun;(1)deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, (2) Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Pelosi. Stupid is as stupid does.


22 posted on 07/30/2008 1:13:22 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Nancy Pelosi is a failure as Speaker of the House.


23 posted on 07/30/2008 1:13:44 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
There is a reason why oil went up 4 dollrs a barrel today, it was because of this press release,

It actually had to do with an unexpected decline in gasoline supplies.

24 posted on 07/30/2008 1:13:44 PM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
Americans know that thanks to the two oilmen in the White House Nancy Pelosi and the Democrat congress, consumers are now paying $4 a gallon for gas.

There...fixed it.

25 posted on 07/30/2008 1:13:58 PM PDT by 6ppc (It's torch and pitchfork time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

26 posted on 07/30/2008 1:14:32 PM PDT by xcamel (Being on the wrong track means the unintended consequences express train doesnt kill you going by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

This hag is really getting on my nerves quickly! She and all libs have unbound arrogance and stupidity. Them calling Bush stupid is just amazing considering together the libs have an IQ equal to their ratings what is it at 9%?! Aholes!


27 posted on 07/30/2008 1:15:15 PM PDT by LYSandra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GloriaJane

Pelosi operates the same way as that sucker fish on sharks. Her entire univers is founded on the “magic” of the food from the larger fish.

But for big government scum like pelosi could not survive.


28 posted on 07/30/2008 1:15:50 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
Madam Speaker

This "Madam" runs a tight brothel.

29 posted on 07/30/2008 1:16:57 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Since San Nan enjoys crushing the finances of so many ordinary Americans here is my wish and prayer for her...
Nancy...pox on your vineyards, pox on your hotels/real estate, pox on your book sales and pox on all your finances
for the unnecessary strain in the economy due to you and complicit Dems....eat your pox with marinara sauce!


30 posted on 07/30/2008 1:17:18 PM PDT by tflabo (Al)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
Oil is up to where it is now because of a long term, consistent effort by Democrats to limit production and refining of oil.

They and their friends in the "environmentalist" lobby have been at this for decades.

In the 80s the boom in oil exploration left oil producers with a lot of excess capacity. We are finally getting to the point where demand has caught up and supplies are starting to get tight. However it isn't that current demand is greater than supply, it is that future demand is reliably projected to grow considerably. There isn't excess capacity to supply that demand and the Democrats are continuing to fight efforts to expand supply.

The Democrats want to blame "speculators" however, they aren't being all that speculative when they are simply making rather reasonable reactions to what the Democrats say they are going to do.

If we don't start working to increase supply, oil is going to skyrocket. We do have the capability to significantly increase our production. It will take time to do so, that makes it even more important to start now! Somehow the Dems use the inability to bring more capacity on line immediately as an excuse not to do it.

We aren't facing these extremely high prices now because of current demand, we are facing them because we aren't doing anything to address future increases in demand!

31 posted on 07/30/2008 1:17:25 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shankbear

Is this idiot woman for real? She is ignorant on economics for sure. A doofass on science. She takes up good oxygen. Nancy....go away....far away.


On the otherhand, she does produce C02 every minute and C02 is a very important fertilizer for plants. In this limited sense she could be seen as productive.


32 posted on 07/30/2008 1:18:13 PM PDT by Rippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Publius Valerius
It actually had to do with an unexpected decline in gasoline supplies.

Actually prices were quite stable after the oil report came out at 10:30 AM EDT, but skyrockrted after this Pelosi staement was released.

33 posted on 07/30/2008 1:18:39 PM PDT by DallasBiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
FWIW, Pelosi's not stupid. She knows she'd lose the debate. So she chooses not to allow one.

She's not a moron. She's a coward.

34 posted on 07/30/2008 1:18:40 PM PDT by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Pelosi, Boxer, Feinstein, Schwarzenneger, Jerry Brown — when will my fellow California voters come to their senses?


35 posted on 07/30/2008 1:19:15 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

But, N-Nancy, didn’t you promise to LOWER gas prices way back in 2006?

I believe that this is the horse that the GOP can ride back into power in November. Just let Peta Pelosi keep on issuing stupid press releases that keeps the price of gas high.


36 posted on 07/30/2008 1:19:39 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
The President knows, as his own Administration has stated, that the impact of any new drilling will be insignificant - promising savings of only pennies per gallon many years down the road.

When was this study made? Was it before the recent increase in demand by China and India? Before then we had more supply than demand. The price was largely bidding among oil producers to see which wells wouldn't pump that week. Things have changed. Now demand outstrips supply and the bidding is on which purchasers won't get as much oil as they want. In the first situation adding new and likely expensive to run wells would just mean more wells not pumping so there would be little decrease in price. In our current situation (and more so five to ten years from now), the extra oil will have a huge effect on prices because they might be the difference between and oversupply and a shortfall (or a shortfall and a vast shortfall).

This is similar to going by a current study on whether to increase farm land, but trying to apply it to a situation during a great drought when people are starving and fighting over every loaf of bread.

37 posted on 07/30/2008 1:19:44 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Whale oil: the renewable biofuel for the 21st century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Democrats hate futures markets because they can prove in today’s dollars the likely future impact of their idiotic schemes. Wow, I’m slow. Just figured that out.


38 posted on 07/30/2008 1:21:49 PM PDT by Rippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff; backhoe
BTTT




39 posted on 07/30/2008 1:22:02 PM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
My brain is going to explode if I see or hear that stupid reference “thanks to the two oilmen in the White House” again. It is a stupid attempt to infer a conspiracy among “oilmen, big oil, the evil oil companies that make obscene profits, etc. ad nauseum” and the President and Vice President of the United States of America. The damn liberals lap it up, and never stop to think how ridiculous they sound. Now THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE, Ms. Pelousey, adds her 2 cents. Any time, during a conversation about the energy crisis, someone tries to make a point by mentioning big oil and the President, I immediately leave. I am not going to waste my good hearing listening to babble BS.
40 posted on 07/30/2008 1:23:32 PM PDT by BatGuano (We're not playing Tidally Winks here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson