Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I figured the author's name was it's own barf alert. This is the media getting the Kool-aid swilling lemmings ready for Senator Obama's defeat in the Fall, IMO.
1 posted on 08/02/2008 1:59:39 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hmmmmmm.......’Dan Rather’ and ‘pure folly’ in the same sentence.


2 posted on 08/02/2008 2:01:38 PM PDT by TexasNative2000 (Is this tagline governed by McCain-Feingold?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I was actually surprised at how sane and relatively accurate the piece is.

All fair points IMO.


3 posted on 08/02/2008 2:02:47 PM PDT by Crimson Elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If you must search for historical antecedents, you could also look at 1980, when unpopular incumbent Jimmy Carter ran a close race against Ronald Reagan

What nonsense. Bush isn't running. McCain isn't an incumbent. Unfortunately, this is a lot more like Dole/ Clinton.

5 posted on 08/02/2008 2:05:03 PM PDT by Soliton (Investigate, study, learn, then express an opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This just in from a Kinko’s near you...


6 posted on 08/02/2008 2:10:03 PM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Obama was up by 20 Dan Rather would be saying that summer polls means that the election is over.


7 posted on 08/02/2008 2:10:08 PM PDT by DallasBiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
perhaps this is advantage Obama, as one theory has it that pollsters, who only use land lines to place their polling calls, are missing a lot of Obama's younger, cell-phone-only supporters.

I'm pretty sure most pollsters use random number generators that would indeed pick up cell phone users. Plus, the same methods that caused Obambi's numbers to be overstated in the primaries are the same methods used today.

Then, add the fact that the Republican candidate almost always underpolls actual performance, and I can see no valid reason to think Obama is in better shape than the polls suggest.

8 posted on 08/02/2008 2:11:30 PM PDT by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Oblahma had a lead Blather would say the polls are all telling and all knowing. Republicans need to hang Pelosi around Oblahmas neck.


9 posted on 08/02/2008 2:11:31 PM PDT by screaminsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Dan is absolutely correct here. After all, the MSM has not had the opportunity to pull the full range of shenanigans before the conventions. Especially the last minute “revelation” about the Republican candidate tactic they are so famous for.


18 posted on 08/02/2008 2:29:58 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper (A vote for third party is a vote for nObama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Dan “I’ll Cheat To Win An Election” Rather, is already making excused for his candidate and hedging his bets by reaching for sh!t by trying to compare 2008 to 1980 that we can be sure that the ‘highest turnout in history’ is showing serious signs of collapse.

Enjoy your next loss Dan!!!!! You deserved every one of them.


19 posted on 08/02/2008 2:30:50 PM PDT by bpjam (Drill For Oil or Lose Your Job!! Vote Nov 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

....for once I’m with Rather....summer polls are crap....we need to all start putting money away for the Fall push...McCain will have to PAY to get his story out...Obama gets his out for FREE courtesy of the MSM.


22 posted on 08/02/2008 3:41:25 PM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

dan who?


24 posted on 08/02/2008 4:18:26 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (when did the circus freak show escape and take over the entire world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cacique

btt


27 posted on 08/02/2008 5:24:15 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

HEY DAN, WEREN’T YOU FIRED IN DISGRACE FOR AIRING FORGED DOCUMENTS DURING IN THE LAST PRESIDENTIAL RACE?

just wondering - didn’t people used to hang their head in shame and stay quiet in the olden days that you come from?


28 posted on 08/02/2008 6:30:30 PM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If you must search for historical antecedents, you could also look at 1980, when unpopular incumbent Jimmy Carter ran a close race against Ronald Reagan until very late in the campaign, when voters evidently decided they were comfortable with the former actor and onetime governor of California. Reagan went on to win by nine points in an electoral landslide.

Yeah, just like now. The media is trying to push their candidate and then when their candidate goes on to get clobbered they claim that the voters changed sides. What a bunch of BS.

31 posted on 08/02/2008 10:32:20 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Quick justice for the senseless killing of Marine Lance Cpl. Robert Crutchfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson