Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clintons ready to crash Obama's party .... ("Denounce Nobama's Coronation")
Press Democrat ^ | Thursday, August 14, 2008 | MAUREEN DOWD

Posted on 08/14/2008 9:39:38 AM PDT by IrishMike

While Obama was spending three hours watching "The Dark Knight" five time zones away, and going to a fund-raiser featuring "Aloha attire" and Hawaiian pupus, Hillary was busy planning her convention.

You can almost hear her mind whirring: She's amazed at how easy it was to snatch Denver away from the Obama saps. Like taking candy from a baby, except Beanpole Guy doesn't eat candy. In just a couple of weeks, Bill and Hill were able to drag No Drama Obama into a swamp of Clinton drama.

Now they've made Barry's convention all about them -- their dissatisfaction and revisionism and barely disguised desire to see him fail. Whatever insincere words of support the Clintons muster, their primal scream gets louder: He can't win! He can't close the deal! We told you so! Hillary's orchestrating a play within the play in Denver. Just as Hamlet used the device to show that his stepfather murdered his father, Hillary will try to show the Democrats they chose the wrong savior.

Her former aide Howard Wolfson fanned the divisive flames Monday on ABC News, arguing that Hillary would have beaten Obama in Iowa and become the nominee if John Edwards' affair had come out last year -- an assertion contradicted by a University of Iowa survey showing that far more Edwards supporters had Obama as their second choice.

Hillary feels no guilt about encouraging her supporters to mess up Obama's big moment, thus undermining his odds of beating John McCain and improving her odds of being the nominee in 2012.

She's obviously relishing Hillaryworld's plans to have multiple rallies in Denver, to take out TV and print ads and to hold up signs in the hall that read "Denounce Nobama's Coronation."

(Excerpt) Read more at pressdemocrat.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008dncconvention; barakobama; clintom; democrats; hillary; obama; puma
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: IrishMike

Oh please. She’s not aiming for 2012, the future is now!


21 posted on 08/14/2008 10:12:23 AM PDT by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

If anything is released about Obama, it won’t be traceable to Hillary.,,,,,,”

Of course not! McCain, Rove, Bush, take your pick, but never the Clintons.


22 posted on 08/14/2008 10:12:27 AM PDT by Islander7 ("Show me an honest politician and I will show you a case of mistaken identity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Hillary to save the party Clinton’s and accept the nomination when she releases dev......”

Oh come on now. You aren’t suggesting Hillary would place personal goals above the party, are you?

;-)


23 posted on 08/14/2008 10:14:14 AM PDT by Islander7 ("Show me an honest politician and I will show you a case of mistaken identity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
That is very true. If Hillary somehow manages to snatch the nomination away from Obama, the Democrat party will basically be finished. For one they will lose the Black vote (and for those saying that cannot happen consider that once upon a time blacks used to vote overwhelmingly Republican), and they will also forfeit the young vote that considers it to be 'unfair.'

This may actually be an opportunity for the Republicans. Think of it, the African-American demographic is actually very strongly conservative on social issues, and most vote Democrat primarily out of tradition (and the shrill urgings of 'black leaders' like Sharpton, who are slowly losing their level of influence). This could be a major inflection point that is similar to that which shunted Blacks from the Republican to the Democrat party (simply because it seemed that the Democrats were more for Civil rights than Republicans, which at the time I'd say seemed the case. This made Blacks move from the party that had actually stood up for freeing slaves, even though Lincoln may have had other subtler reasons for doing so it is still the Republican party that stood for this, to a party that had been the fount of the White supremacist movement in the South ...the Democrat party).

Imagine what would happen if Obama, who for lack of a better word is revered by blacks and young voters, had the nomination (for lack of a better word) 'taken away' from him.

That would be the death knell of the Democrat party, and Hillary would just have won herself a Phyrric victory (sp). I think this is a great opportunity for us, especially among young upward mobile blacks (college degree, professional background), and middle-aged black professionals (who would be typical Republican voters ....were it not for the fact that they vote Democrat).

24 posted on 08/14/2008 10:16:25 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

I still don’t think she has a chance in “her future place of residence”.
The argument that somehow the democrat voters will reason that she was the best choice because of Obama’s failure doesn’t hold up.
The Democrat voters place all their collective futures on feelings. Not fact-based reasoning.
The candidate they will swoon over must be a “visionary”, a “leader in the field of ideas”. ( plans are optional)
No matter how you slice her, (?) Hillary is still just a battered wife of a hillbilly politician. Her own party has moved on. I believe she is simply taking a last trip down Sunset Boulevard. “I’m ready for my close up Mr. DeMille”.

JC


25 posted on 08/14/2008 10:18:40 AM PDT by John 3_19-21 ("Don't hope for energy, vote for it!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

All I can say is that if I were a democrat I’d be very upset with my party for taking away the voter’s rights in foavor of what Howeird Dean and the left wing wanted. It’s the ultimate hypocrisy to have actually done what they projected our side of doing in 2000!


26 posted on 08/14/2008 10:20:49 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on
Couldn't agree more!

...However, just watch between now and Denver how many on this very site loooong to have the clintons back in power!

27 posted on 08/14/2008 10:21:24 AM PDT by top 2 toe red ("Cackling hillary...makes her sound like she is mentally-illary." Jimmy Kimmel. "Uh...she is!" Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: livius

I think the clintons are light years ahead of Obama in the ruthless, evil-to-the-core, do ANYTHING for power department...they make him look like Mother Teresa...my opinion...


28 posted on 08/14/2008 10:26:19 AM PDT by top 2 toe red ("Cackling hillary...makes her sound like she is mentally-illary." Jimmy Kimmel. "Uh...she is!" Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Correct, it is planned by both Clinton and Obama teams. He simply wants her voters, so he is being nice.

Nothing exciting at all.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/08/deal-clintons-n.html


29 posted on 08/14/2008 10:34:41 AM PDT by roses of sharon (SAVE YOUR GAS RECIEPTS, SEND TO PELOSI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
Raw deal?!?...ABC, Fox news, Rush, Hannity, Coulter, Rove, Ingraham, O'Reilly, tons of FReepers, etc., etc., carried so much water for her that they still have water sloushing around in their shoes.

As for the sorry bunch at the DNC, she agreed with everything they did, until it no longer benefitted her.

30 posted on 08/14/2008 10:37:41 AM PDT by top 2 toe red ("Cackling hillary...makes her sound like she is mentally-illary." Jimmy Kimmel. "Uh...she is!" Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: weeder

“You’re pitying her...”

No, no, and no.

I have finely developed sense of fairplay, common courtesy, and conservative ideals.

What the DNC did to Hillary offends me. I’d rather have a (relatively) clean debate rather than that dog and pony show with the “impartial” moderators asking her the first question every time and then having that empty suit straight from the bowels of Marx chime in, “Me, too!”

It was like watching Buffalo Bob (Oh geez, my age shows!) work the Howdy-Doody puppet, only this time, the strings were pulled by Charles Gibson and his crew of head of bangers.

BTW, I’m actively campaigning for McCain.


31 posted on 08/14/2008 10:41:30 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

I’m glad you’re campaigning for McCain. The alternative is just too awful to contemplate. But regarding the press and their “unfair” treatment of Hillary, I don’t buy it. The Clintons are image masters, and know how to play the “unfair” card in ways that others can only dream of. Plus the press might be totally fed up with them and their crap, and have chosen to not play nice anymore. Either way, we don’t have a dog in that fight, so screw ‘em. A pox on both their houses.


32 posted on 08/14/2008 11:01:35 AM PDT by weeder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

Dementia in Denver!!!


33 posted on 08/14/2008 11:07:50 AM PDT by xc1427 (It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees...Midnight Oil (Power and the Passion))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

This is gonna be a gooood convention, lol. I usually don’t watch the dims big show, but this time I’ll have it on..... on mute that is. I am really depending on my fellow FReepers telling me when the good stuff starts so that I can unmute.

Funny, I find myself almost.... almost.... rooting for the beast.....then I catch myself. I don’t want that woman one stolen election closer to the oval office. Obama is the much weaker candidate. But I NEVER thought I’d despise any democrat more than I do Hillary and Bill. Well, then along came Obama.

This whole thing has been so entertaining to watch though.

pattyjo


34 posted on 08/14/2008 11:08:34 AM PDT by pj_627
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pj_627
I NEVER thought I’d despise any democrat more than I do Hillary and Bill. Well, then along came Obama.<"P>Democrats are good that way.
35 posted on 08/14/2008 2:10:35 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Obama is a media prop.
Its his close circle of friends and advisors who are the brains. Obama is just an actor.


36 posted on 08/14/2008 2:17:01 PM PDT by winodog (We have been set up for Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson